| Literature DB >> 35372813 |
Katelyn Vendrely Brenneman1, Xue Li2, Sudhir Kumar3, Elizabeth Delgado2, Lisa A Checkley1, Douglas A Shoue1, Ann Reyes2, Biley A Abatiyow3, Meseret T Haile3, Rupam Tripura4,5, Tom Peto4,5, Dysoley Lek6,7, Katrina A Button-Simons1, Stefan H I Kappe3,8, Mehul Dhorda4,5, François Nosten5,9, Standwell C Nkhoma10, Ian H Cheeseman11, Ashley M Vaughan3,8, Michael T Ferdig1, Tim J C Anderson2.
Abstract
Classical malaria parasite genetic crosses involve isolation, genotyping, and phenotyping of progeny parasites, which is time consuming and laborious. We tested a rapid alternative approach-bulk segregant analysis (BSA)-that utilizes sequencing of bulk progeny populations with and without drug selection for rapid identification of drug resistance loci. We used dihydroartemisinin (DHA) selection in two genetic crosses and investigated how synchronization, cryopreservation, and the drug selection regimen impacted BSA success. We detected a robust quantitative trait locus (QTL) at kelch13 in both crosses but did not detect QTLs at four other candidate loci. QTLs were detected using synchronized, but not unsynchronized progeny pools, consistent with the stage-specific action of DHA. We also successfully applied BSA to cryopreserved progeny pools, expanding the utility of this approach. We conclude that BSA provides a powerful approach for investigating the genetic architecture of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum.Entities:
Keywords: Biological sciences; Genomics; Parasitology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35372813 PMCID: PMC8971943 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Figure 1The principles of bulk segregant analysis with human malaria parasites
(A) Recombinant progeny pools are generated using Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes and FRG huHep mice.
(B) Determination of drug concentration for bulk segregant analysis (BSA). A standard approach is to measure the IC50 and IC90 value of the resistant parent; however, in this study, we used eRRSA to determine a discerning drug concentration for selection since classical IC50 and IC90 measurements using DHA do not correlate with the in vivo measure of ART resistance, clinical parasite clearance rate.
(C) An overview of drug BSA, selection is applied with drug of choice to half of the recombinant progeny pool; each bar indicates a representative recombinant progeny.
(D) Genomic sequencing measures changes in allele frequency of segregant pools. Green arrows indicate allele frequency changes detected from both pools with and without drug treatment, which are thus not related to drug resistance, while the orange arrow indicates a locus conferring drug resistance.
Segregating variation in two genetic crosses
| Gene name | Gene ID | Cross 1 | Cross 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cambodia | Malawi | Thailand | Africa | ||
| KH004 | Mal31 | NHP1337 | NF54 | ||
| PF3D7_13437000 | C580Y | WT | C580Y | WT | |
| PF3D7_1318100 | WT | WT | |||
| PF3D7_1460900 | WT | WT | |||
| PF3D7_1447900 | I492V,S208N | WT | |||
| PF3D7_0709000 | DD2 | WT | DD21 | WT | |
In addition to a known ART-resistance-associated mutation in kelch13, three variants (underlined amino acid changes) showing strong associations in a genome-wide association analysis (Miotto et al., 2015) are also segregating in these crosses. See also Figure S1.
Alleles carry same amino acid mutations as the Dd2 parasite line (M74I, N75E, K76T, A220S, Q271E, N326S, I356T, and R371I) when compared to reference (3D7).
Details of gametocytemia and mosquito infection for generating the crosses
| Mosquito cage | % Gametocytemia | Post feed exflagellation centers/ field of view | Oocyst numbers (Mean) | Oocyst numbers (Median) | % Prevalence | Sporozoites/ Mosquito |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KH004 only infection | 3.74 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 3 | 76 | 18,965 |
| Mal31 only infection | 2.19 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 84 | 45,500 |
| KH004 × Mal31 cage 1 | NA | 3 | 8.3 | 7 | 91 | 40,832 |
| KH004 × Mal31 cage 2 | NA | 3 | 7 | 3 | 83 | 26,590 |
| KH004 × Mal31 cage 3 | NA | 3 | 11.5 | 5 | 71 | 44,541 |
| NF54 only infection | 3.83 | 4 | 42.45 | 36 | 91.5 | 15,866 |
| NHP1337 only infection | 3.28 | 2.6 | 23 | 15.5 | 79 | 21,437 |
| NF54 × NHP1337 cage 1 | NA | 3.75 | 41 | 38.5 | 100 | 38,117 |
| NF54 × NHP1337 cage 2 | NA | 3.75 | 21.6 | 14.5 | 78.6 | 32,850 |
| NF54 × NHP1337 cage 3 | NA | 3.75 | 31 | 13 | 88 | 19,411 |
| NF54 × NHP1337 cage 4 | NA | 3.75 | 14.8 | 9 | 92 | 26,000 |
NA, not applicable. See also Figures S2 and S3.
average number of exflagellation center formation observed under ∼8–10 random fields of view under bright-field microscope (40×).
Figure 2eRRSA dose-response curves for the DHA-resistant parent KH004 and a Mal31 × KH004 recombinant progeny pool
Synchronized ring stage parasites were treated with 10 DHA concentrations (in a two-fold dilution series starting at 2,800 nM) for 6 h. Higher fold change indicates increased parasite death in drug-treated versus untreated parasites using our eRRSA method. Both the KH004 parent (ART-resistant) and the Mal31×KH004 recombinant progeny pool were tested using three biological replicates to determine the optimal DHA concentration for bulk segregant DHA selection (data are represented as mean standard deviation). Dashed lines indicate 50 and 100 nM and were chosen as discerning doses for treatment of bulk populations to selectively enrich for resistant parasites.
Figure 3DHA bulk segregant analysis (BSA) on bulk progeny from the Mal31×KH004 cross
(A) Synchronization of parasites at the ring stage: (1) pools without synchronization; (2–4) pools synchronized at 0, 18, and 36 h, respectively.
(B) DHA BSA analyses of (1) the unsynchronized pool, (2–4) pools synchronized at 0, 18, and 36 h, respectively.
(C) DHA BSA with a cryopreserved recombinant pool synchronized at 0 h. Orange and black lines are G prime values comparing allele frequency of 50 nM or 100 nM DHA-treated pools with control pools; orange (50 nM) and black (100 nM) dashed lines are corresponding significance thresholds (FDR = 0.01). The numbers (1–14) above the x-axis in panels B and C indicate the 14 P. falciparum chromosomes. There was no threshold line plotted for panel B (1) unsynchronized as no G prime value passed the significance test. See also Figures S4, S5, and S6, and Table S1.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| O+ human red blood cells | Interstate Blood Bank (Memphis, TN) & Valley Biomedical (Winchester, VA) | N/A |
| NHP1337 [cloned | Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand. | N/A |
| KH004 [cloned | Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand | N/A |
| MAL31 [cloned | Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, | N/A |
| DHA (dihydroartemisinin) | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# D7439 |
| RPMI 1640 with L-glutamine | Gibco, Life Technologies | Cat# 31800022 |
| 50 mg/L hypoxanthine | Millipore, Fisher Scientific | Cat# 4010CBC |
| 25 mM HEPES | Corning, Fisher Scientific | Cat# 61034RO |
| 0.5% Albumax II | Gibco, Life Technologies | Cat# 11021045 |
| 10 ug/mL gentamycin | Gibco, Life Technologies | Cat# 15710072 |
| 0.225% Sodium bicarbonate | Corning, VWR | Cat# 25-035-CI |
| Glycerolyte | Medline | Cat# FWL4A7831 |
| 1X PBS (phosphate buffer saline) | Fisher Scientific | Cat# PB665-1 |
| 70% Percoll | Sigma | Cat# P1644 |
| 13.3% sorbitol | Sigma | Cat# S1876 |
| SYBR Green I | Life Technologies | Cat# S785 |
| SYTO 61 | Life Technologies | Cat# S11343 |
| Phusion Blood Direct PCR kit | Life Technologies | Cat# F547L |
| KAPA HyperPlus Kit | Roche | Lot 0000123512 |
| NEXTflex Dual-Indexed DNA Barcodes (1-96) | PerkinElmer | Cat# NOVA-514160 |
| KAPA Pure Beads | Roche | Cat# 0798328001 |
| Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit | Invitrogen | Cat# Q33120 |
| KAPA Library Quant Kit (Illumina) | Roche | Cat# 07960140001 |
| D1000 ScreenTape | Agilent Technologies | Cat# 5067-5584 |
| Human Serum | Valley Biomedical | HS10040PM |
| Deposited data | ||
| Raw sequencing data | NABI Sequence Read Archive | PRJNA524855 |
| Prism v9 | GraphPad | |
| R | R-Project | |
| QTLseqr | R package | |