| Literature DB >> 35372705 |
Irén Sipeki1, Tímea Vissi1,2, Ibolya Túri1.
Abstract
In the past decade, mental health is embedded in the concept of health and teachers' mental health has become the focus of surveys. In this study we examined the mental health of special educator-students compared to their lecturers and inspectors at the University Semmelweis Pető András Faculty. We used the validated Hungarian language Mental Health Test (MHT) to assess the mental health. The MHT is linked to the concept of physical and mental wellbeing, it is ability-based approach, and examines 5 areas: wellbeing, savoring, creative-executive efficiency self-regulation resilience. Altogether 237 questionnaires had been returned that were suitable for evaluation (19 lecturers, 16 instructors and 202 students). Students' mean values are lower than the instructors' and lecturers' mean values, and students presented significant lower scores in three scales: self-regulation, creative-executive efficiency, and resilience subscales. In the wellbeing scale we found significant correlation with the existence of the separate room to learn/work during the home-office. These results point to the need for the university to pay attention to the mental health of students, who will be able to consciously monitor their mental health, and who are able to provide effective support to their students.Entities:
Keywords: Covid-19; Higher education; Mental health
Year: 2022 PMID: 35372705 PMCID: PMC8958264 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Development of the health concept from the medical to the wellbeing model (sources: Larson, 1999, authors’ construction).
| medical model | holistic approach | wellbeing model | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classic theories are based on the balance theory of medicine: disease is a consequence of imbalance; thus treatment is aimed to restore perfect balance. | „Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” ( | Disease and health are parallel dimensions rather than antipoles. Health: inner experience or feeling power and capacity that enables us to overcome disease | |
| criticism | lack of individual responsibility, a condition totally lacking disease and pain is almost incompatible with life | Underestimated social/economic and cultural effects. The definition of health does not reveal which health conditions are regarded good or bad and what exactly “social wellbeing” means | Difficult to quantify, experiencing wellbeing may vary both in individuals and in cultures, a given individual may evaluate their condition differently according to age or life situation |
Figure 1The concepts of MHT: mental health and its components (authors' construction).
Characteristics of participants.
| Under 25 years | 0 | 0 | first | 75 | 37,1 |
| 26–35 years | 3 | 8,6 | second | 59 | 29,2 |
| 36–45 years | 6 | 17,1 | third | 43 | 21,3 |
| 46–55 years | 16 | 45,7 | fourth | 25 | 12,4 |
| 56–65 years | 9 | 25,7 | |||
| 65 + years | 1 | 2,9 | |||
| early years | 2 | 5,7 | not applicable | 75 | 37,1 |
| pre-school | 6 | 17,1 | pre-school | 60 | 29,7 |
| primary school | 5 | 14,3 | primary school | 54 | 26,7 |
| vocational school | 2 | 5,7 | rehabilitation | 13 | 6,4 |
| adult | 1 | 2,9 | |||
| Institute of Conductive Pedagogy | 10 | 28,6 | |||
| Institute of Human Sciences | 9 | 25,7 | |||
| capital | 27 | 77,1 | capital | 79 | 39,1 |
| county seat | 0 | 0 | county seat | 24 | 11,9 |
| small town | 3 | 8,6 | small town | 61 | 30,2 |
| village | 4 | 11,4 | village | 32 | 15,8 |
| other | 1 | 2,9 | other | 6 | 3 |
| yes | 28 | 80 | yes | 157 | 77,7 |
| no | 7 | 20 | no | 45 | 22,3 |
Mean values of MHT scales concerning students, instructors and lecturers. The sources of the Hungarian mean values: Vargha et al. (2020).
| Hungarian mean minimum value | Hungarian mean maximum value | student mean | lecturer mean | instructor mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wellbeing | 3,6 | 5,2 | 3,7 | 3,7 | 4 |
| self-regulation | 2,6 | 4,9 | 3,6 | 4,2 | 4,3 |
| savoring | 3,8 | 5,5 | 4,5 | 4,2 | 4,5 |
| resilience | 2,8 | 4,9 | 3,3 | 4 | 4 |
| creative-executive activity | 4 | 5,3 | 4,1 | 4,4 | 4,5 |
| MHT mean | 3,6 | 4,9 | 3,9 | 4,1 | 4,3 |
Significance of MHT subscales between the groups involved in the study (Dunn test).
| name of MHT subscale | chi-squared | p value | result |
|---|---|---|---|
| wellbeing | 0.97 | 0.617 | |
| savoring | 1.84 | 0.399 | |
| creative-executive efficiency | 12.73 | 0.002 | ∗ |
| self-regulation | 16.77 | 0.000 | ∗ |
| resilience | 8.98 | 0.011 | ∗ |
Figure 2Differences of the self-regulation subscale of the MHT questionnaire among lecturers, instructors and students.
Figure 3Differences of the resilience subscale of the MHT questionnaire among lecturers, instructors and students.
Figure 4Differences of the creative-executive efficiency subscale of the MHT questionnaire among lecturers, instructors and students.
Significance of the subscales of the MHT between the groups involved in the research (Mann-Whitney test).
| name of MET subscale | W value | p value | result |
|---|---|---|---|
| wellbeing | 5721.0 | 0.036 | ∗ |
| savoring | 5324.5 | 0.237 | |
| creative-executive efficiency | 5069.5 | 0.551 | |
| self-regulation | 4817.5 | 0.987 | |
| resilience | 5574.0 | 0.079 |
Figure 5Differences of the connection between the wellbeing subscale of the MHT questionnaire and the separate room among lecturers, instructors and students.