| Literature DB >> 35372625 |
Sayeh Shiri1, Azizeh Farshbaf-Khalili2, Khalil Esmaeilpour3, Niloofar Sattarzadeh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a stressful time period. Adolescents experience new changes physically, mentally, emotionally, and socially. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on anxiety (primary outcome), depression, and quality of life (secondary outcomes) of adolescents. Materials And Method: This was a quasi-experimental study with pre and postintervention design. One hundred female students aged 16-18 years with mild to moderate anxiety selected through multistage cluster sampling from five educational districts of Tabriz. During six group counseling sessions, students were consulted with the acceptance and commitment approach according to the protocol. Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventory and the World Health Organization brief Quality of Life Questionnaire consultation were completed before, immediately after, and 8 weeks after the consultation. Data were analyzed using repeated measure ANCOVA.Entities:
Keywords: Acceptance and commitment therapy; adolescence; anxiety; counseling; depression; quality of life
Year: 2022 PMID: 35372625 PMCID: PMC8974981 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1486_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Figure 1Flowchart of study
Study protocol
| Sessions | Purpose/content/tasks |
|---|---|
| First session | Purpose: Establishing a therapeutic relationship, acquainting people with the subject of research and giving a general explanation about the ACT approach, explaining about anxiety disorder, and creating insight in students |
| Second session | Purpose: Investigating ineffective control methods and creating creative frustration |
| Third session | Purpose: Explaining mindfulness and acceptance |
| Fourth session | Purpose: Cognitive defusion and self-awareness as a background |
| Fifth session | Purpose: Explaining values |
| Sixth session | Purpose: Creating a commitment to act in line with values |
ACT=Acceptance and commitment therapy
Demographic characteristics of the students
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 16.3 (0.9) |
| Father’s age (years), mean (SD) | 47.0 (6.3) |
| Mother’s age (years), mean (SD) | 42.2 (5.7) |
| Father’s life status | |
| Dead | 3 (3.0) |
| Alive | 97 (97.0) |
| Father education | |
| Illiterate | 3 (3.0) |
| Under diploma | 17 (17.0) |
| Diploma | 57 (57.0) |
| College | 23 (23.0) |
| Mother’s education | |
| Illiterate | 5 (5.0) |
| Under diploma | 56 (56.0) |
| Diploma | 29 (29.0) |
| College | 10 (10.0) |
| Father’s job status | |
| Unemployed | 5 (5.0) |
| Worker | 17 (17.0) |
| Employed | 21 (21.0) |
| Retired | 8 (8.0) |
| Self-employment | 44 (44.0) |
| Lawyer | 2 (2.0) |
| Mather job state | |
| Housekeeper | 90 (90.0) |
| Working at home | 3 (3.0) |
| Working outdoors | 6 (6.0) |
| Home status | |
| Lord | 84 (84.0) |
| Renter | 16 (16.0) |
| Family income | |
| Insufficient | 7 (7.0) |
| Approximately insufficient | 44 (44.0) |
| Sufficient and more | 49 (49.0) |
| Number of children in family, mean (SD) | 2.4 (0.8) |
| Birth rank | |
| First child | 48 (48.0) |
| Second child | 36 (36.0) |
| Third child | 13 (13.0) |
| Forth child | 2 (2.0) |
| Sixth child | 1 (1.0) |
| Emotional relation with parents | |
| Poor | 13 (13.0) |
| Good | 35 (35.0) |
| Excellent | 52 (52.0) |
| Life status | |
| Living with family | 89 (89.0) |
| Living with father | 2 (2.0) |
| Living with mother | 7 (7.0) |
| Living with grand parents | 2 (2.0) |
| Supplemental status | |
| Ferrous sulfate | 27 (27.0) |
| Multivitamin | 4 (4.0) |
| Acid folic | 5 (5.0) |
| Ferrous and acid folic | 16 (16.0) |
| None of them | 47 (47.0) |
| Class degree | |
| Tenth | 73 (73.0) |
| Eleventh | 12 (12.0) |
| Twelfth | 15 (15.0) |
SD=Standard deviation
Anxiety and depression index of the participants
| Anxiety (BAI) | Depression (BDI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Before intervention (1)/mean (SD) | 16.7 (4.8) | 17.0 (11.5) |
| After intervention (2)/mean (SD) | 12.7 (9.3) | 11.0 (10.4) |
| 8 weeks after intervention (3)/mean (SD) | 12.8 (8.7) | 12.7 (11.0) |
| <0.001; −3.9 (−5.8-−1.9) | <0.001; −4.2 (−6.8-−1.6) | |
| <0.001; −4.0 (−5.9-−2.0) | <0.001; −6.0 (−8.3-−3.8) | |
| 0.999; 0.1 (−1.7-1.9) | 0.052; 1.8 (−3.6-−0.009) | |
| Total | <0.001* | <0.001† |
*Sphericity test for the effect of time ANOVA: Repeated measure, † Greenhouse-Geisser test for the effect of time ANOVA: Repeated measure, P (3)-(1), P (2)-(1), P (3)-(2): Repeated measure ANOVA: Pairwise comparison. BDI=Beck depression inventory II, BAI=Beck anxiety inventory-I, SD=Standard deviation, CI=Confidence interval, MD=Mean difference
Frequency of anxiety screening in the study participants based on Beck depression inventory at different times
| Anxiety | Before intervention, | After intervention, | 8 weeks after intervention, |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absence or minimum (0-7) | 0 | 31 (31.0) | 36 (36.4) | <0.001 |
| Mild (8-15) | 41 (41.0) | 40 (40.0) | 32 (32.3) | |
| Moderate (16-25) | 59 (59.0) | 19 (19.0) | 18 (18.2) | |
| Severe (26-63) | 0 | 10 (10.0) | 13 (13.1) |
‡ Friedman test
Frequency of depression screening in the study participants based on BAI at different times
| Depression | Before intervention, | After intervention, | 8 weeks after intervention, |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absence or minimum (0-10) | 28 (28.0) | 61 (61.0) | 54 (54.6) | <0.001 |
| Mild (11-20) | 39 (39.0) | 24 (24.0) | 23 (23.2) | |
| Moderate (21-30) | 21 (21.0) | 8 (8.0) | 14 (14.1) | |
| Severe (31 and more) | 12 (12.0) | 7 (7.0) | 8 (8.1) |
‡ Friedman test
Quality of life score and its dimensions in the participants before and after the intervention
| Dimensions of life quality | Mean (SD) | MD (95% CI)/mean 3-1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Before intervention (1) | After intervention (2) | 8 weeks after intervention (3) | ||||
| Physical health (0-100) | 70.4 (16.8) | 75.2 (16.3) | 76.3 (14.3) | 5.9 (2.2-9.7) | <0.001 | <0.001* |
| Psychological (0-100) | 59.1 (19.1) | 64.3 (21.3) | 64.5 (19.4) | 4.6 (0.4-8.8) | 0.027 | 0.004† |
| Social relation (0-100) | 64.6 (20.4) | 70.1 (22.5) | 67.1 (22.7) | 2.5 (−1.7-6.6) | 0.243 | 0.017† |
| Environment (0-100) | 69.3 (15.5) | 72.0 (17.3) | 74.6 (16.4) | 5.4 (2.5-8.2) | <0.001 | <0.001* |
| Total life quality (0-100) | 67.2 (14.8) | 71.1 (16.3) | 71.9 (14.6) | 4.7 (2.3-7.1) | <0.001 | <0.001† |
| MD (95% CI)/mean 2-mean 1 | - | - | - | 3.7 (1.8-5.9) | <0.001 | - |
| MD (95% CI)/mean 3-mean 2 | - | - | - | 0.8 (−1.2-2.8) | 0.413 | - |
¥ Sphericity test for repeated measure, *Sphericity test for the effect of time ANOVA: Repeated measure, † Greenhouse-Geisser test for the effect of time ANOVA: Repeated measure. P (3)-(1), P (2)-(1), P (3)-(2): Repeated measure ANOVA: Pairwise comparison. SD=Standard deviation, CI=Confidence interval, MD=Mean difference