| Literature DB >> 35372554 |
En Liu1,2, Mengxue Sun2, Chenxin He1, Kang Mao2, Qin Li1, Jianhong Zhang1, Deyong Wu1, Shuzhen Wang1, Chuanxia Zheng1, Wenbin Li1, Shimin Gong1, Fuguang Xue1,2, Huadong Wu1.
Abstract
Flavonoids played critical roles in stabilizing microbial homoeostasis when animals suffered exoteric stresses. However, whether flavonoids attenuated heat stress of dairy cows is still not clear. Therefore, in the present article, flavonoids extracted from honeycomb were supplemented to investigate the production, digestibility, and rumen microbial metabolism responses of cows under heat stress conditions. A total of 600 multiparous dairy herds were randomly allotted into the control treatment (CON), the heat stress (HS) treatment, and the honeycomb flavonoids supplement under heat stress conditions (HF) treatment for a 30-day-long trial. Each treatment contains 4 replicates, with 50 cows in each replicate. Production performances including dry matter intake (DMI), milk production, and milk quality were measured on the basis of replicate. Furthermore, two cows of each replicate were selected for the measurement of the nutrient digestibility, the ruminal fermentable parameters including ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids, and ammonia-N, and the rumen microbial communities and metabolism. Results showed that HF effectively increased DMI, milk yield, milk fat, and ruminal acetate content (p < 0.05) compared with HS. Likewise, digestibility of NDF was promoted after HF supplement compared with HS. Furthermore, relative abundances of rumen microbial diversities especially Succiniclasticum, Pseudobutyrivibrio, Acetitomaculum, Streptococcus, and Succinivibrio, which mainly participated in energy metabolism, significantly improved after HF supplement. Metabolomic investigation showed that HF supplement significantly upregulated relative content of lipometabolic-related metabolites such as phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylserine, and phosphatidylethanolamine, while it downregulated biogenic amines. In summary, HF supplement helps proliferate microbial abundances, which further promoted fiber digestibility and energy provision, and ultimately enhances the production performances of dairy cows under heat stress conditions.Entities:
Keywords: dairy cows; heat stress; honeycomb flavonoids; metabolomics; metagenomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35372554 PMCID: PMC8964602 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.845911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Ingredients and chemical composition of the TMR (dry-matter basis).
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| |
| Corn silage | 24.5 |
| Corn | 15.7 |
| Cottonseed meal | 3.4 |
| Alfalfa hay | 14.5 |
| Chinese wild rye | 10.2 |
| Distillers' dried grains with solubles (DDGS) | 3.1 |
| Steam-flaked corn | 8.5 |
| Soybean meal | 12.0 |
| Beet pulp | 4.5 |
| Premix | 3.0 |
| NaCl | 0.6 |
| Total | 100 |
|
| |
| NE (MJ/kg) | 7.13 |
| EE | 4.56 |
| CP | 17.1 |
| ADF | 18.6 |
| NDF | 31.7 |
| Ca | 0.69 |
| P | 0.44 |
The components contained in the premix are as follows: Fe, 1,400 mg; Cu, 1,200 mg; Mn, 2,400 mg; Zn, 5,500 mg; Se, 40 mg; Co, 30 mg; I, 90 mg; VA, 900,000 IU; VD, 700,000 IU; VE, 9,000 IU.
Figure 1THI record of both heat stress and control treatments. HS, heat stress; CON, control treatment.
Effects of honeycomb flavonoids supplement on production performances and milk quality during heat stress conditions.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Body temperature (°C) | 38.7 | 39.1 | 38.8 | 0.10 | 0.046 |
| DMI (kg) | 22.9 | 21.4 | 22.3 | 0.68 | 0.033 |
| Milk yield (kg) | 31.6 | 29.4 | 30.3 | 0.76 | 0.036 |
| Milk fat (%) | 3.67 | 3.63 | 3.68 | 0.06 | 0.056 |
| Milk protein (%) | 3.38 | 3.34 | 3.37 | 0.03 | 0.412 |
| SCC, ×104 cells/ml | 12.64 | 19.39 | 13.77 | 2.46 | 0.033 |
Means within a row with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05). CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids treatment; DMI, dry matter intake; SCC, somatic cell counts.
Effects of honeycomb flavonoids supplement on rumen fermentable parameters during heat stress conditions.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Ruminal pH | 6.12 | 6.23 | 6.22 | 0.094 | 0.016 |
| Acetate (mmol/L) | 49.24 | 43.62 | 46.07 | 1.273 | 0.038 |
| Propionate (mmol/L) | 14.49 | 13.75 | 13.44 | 0.632 | 0.076 |
| Acetate/propionate | 3.40 | 3.17 | 3.43 | 0.023 | 0.043 |
| Butyrate (mmol/L) | 9.77 | 9.35 | 9.82 | 0.137 | 0.356 |
| Isobutyrate (mmol/L) | 2.23 | 2.08 | 2.11 | 0.115 | 0.642 |
| Valerate (mmol/L) | 2.13 | 2.21 | 2.14 | 0.064 | 0.744 |
| Isovalerate (mmol/L) | 2.31 | 2.26 | 2.46 | 0.16 | 0.915 |
| Ammonia-N (mg/100 ml) | 12.49 | 11.96 | 12.27 | 1.711 | 0.622 |
Means within a row with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05). CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids treatment.
Effects of honeycomb flavonoids supplement on cow digestibility under heat stress conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | 64.03 | 62.86 | 63.83 | 0.71 | 0.176 |
| NDF | 68.64 | 66.08 | 68.62 | 0.32 | 0.001 |
| CP | 62.14 | 62.48 | 61.87 | 0.49 | 0.595 |
| EE | 74.75 | 73.96 | 75.37 | 1.18 | 0.181 |
Means within a row with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05). CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids supplement under heat stress conditions; DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extracts.
Effects of honeycomb flavonoids supplement on α-diversity of ruminal microbiota during heat stress conditions.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Shannon | 7.26 | 7.11 | 7.16 | 0.15 | 0.182 |
| Simpson | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.01 | 0.342 |
| ACE | 2,356.5 | 2,171.4 | 2,203.4 | 52.4 | 0.018 |
| Chao1 | 2,256.3 | 2,116.6 | 2,131.4 | 51.2 | 0.062 |
Means within a row with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05). CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids treatment.
Figure 2Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) on ruminal bacterial community structures of CON, HS, and HF treatments. CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids supplement treatment.
Effects of honeycomb flavonoids supplement on relative abundances of ruminal microbiota communities during heat stress conditions (level of phyla, %).
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.229 |
|
| 0.019 | 0.013 | 0.017 | 0.004 | 0.186 |
|
| 67.78 | 62.78 | 64.76 | 2.16 | 0.028 |
|
| 29.92 | 34.35 | 32.34 | 1.23 | 0.041 |
|
| 1.22 | 1.41 | 1.35 | 0.21 | 0.101 |
|
| 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.335 |
|
| 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.266 |
|
| 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.004 |
|
| 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.11 | 0.133 |
| Others | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.122 |
Means within a row with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05).
CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids treatment.
Effects of honeycomb flavonoids supplement on relative abundances of ruminal microbiota communities during heat stress conditions (level of genera, %).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 20.32 | 16.75 | 18.66 | 1.239 | 0.064 |
|
| 15.84 | 20.20 | 15.64 | 0.189 | 0.005 |
|
| 10.89 | 9.76 | 11.42 | 0.321 | 0.029 |
|
| 5.22 | 5.41 | 5.38 | 0.282 | 0.623 |
|
| 4.84 | 4.07 | 4.49 | 0.206 | 0.041 |
|
| 3.77 | 4.95 | 4.37 | 0.256 | 0.015 |
|
| 2.72 | 1.37 | 1.95 | 0.182 | 0.272 |
|
| 1.27 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 0.237 | 0.371 |
|
| 1.32E+00 | 7.35E−01 | 9.94E−01 | 0.321 | 0.063 |
|
| 6.58E−01 | 7.51E−01 | 7.10E−01 | 0.012 | 0.137 |
|
| 4.43E−01 | 4.05E−01 | 4.28E−01 | 0.134 | 0.395 |
|
| 2.07E−01 | 2.84E−01 | 2.45E−01 | 0.041 | 0.108 |
|
| 1.16E−01 | 1.82E−01 | 1.47E−01 | 0.014 | 0.009 |
|
| 1.08E−01 | 4.00E−02 | 6.66E−02 | 0.021 | 0.167 |
|
| 5.35E−02 | 6.23E−02 | 5.84E−02 | 0.010 | 0.089 |
|
| 2.79E−02 | 2.16E−02 | 2.48E−02 | 0.013 | 0.048 |
|
| 1.50E−02 | 1.47E−02 | 1.51E−02 | 0.008 | 0.571 |
|
| 1.32E−02 | 1.77E−02 | 1.54E−02 | 0.006 | 0.345 |
|
| 2.57E−02 | 7.02E−03 | 1.36E−02 | 0.002 | 0.033 |
|
| 7.85E−03 | 1.39E−02 | 1.06E−02 | 0.003 | 0.029 |
|
| 5.36E−03 | 6.20E−03 | 5.83E−03 | 0.006 | 0.132 |
Means within a row with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05).
CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids treatment.
Figure 3Principal components analysis (PCA) on ruminal metabolite content between different treatments. (A) Principal components analysis (PCA) on ruminal metabolites content between CON and HS treatments. CO, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment. (B) Principal components analysis (PCA) on ruminal metabolite structures between HS and HF treatments. HS, heat stress treatment; HF, honeycomb flavonoids supplement treatment.
Ruminal metabolite alterations under heat stress conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Downregulation | Phenyl-1-thio-beta-D-galactopyranoside | 3.99E-06 | 1.70E-05 | 0.23 | 0.001 | 2.041 |
| Zidovudine | 5.84E-06 | 2.48E-05 | 0.38 | 0.001 | 1.795 | |
| Dimethyl-L-arginine | 3.37E-06 | 8.98E-06 | 0.43 | 0.001 | 1.751 | |
| Pyridoxine | 4.30E-06 | 1.00E-05 | 0.44 | 0.003 | 1.682 | |
| Isoleucyl-asparagine | 5.97E-04 | 3.17E-03 | 0.46 | 0.008 | 1.637 | |
| Herculin | 2.41E-06 | 1.16E-05 | 0.11 | 0.008 | 1.745 | |
| Ferulic acid | 4.06E-05 | 1.24E-04 | 0.33 | 0.010 | 1.563 | |
| Methadone | 1.94E-06 | 9.80E-06 | 0.19 | 0.019 | 1.622 | |
| Hexanediol 1,6-bisphosphate | 2.24E-05 | 5.64E-05 | 0.21 | 0.021 | 1.343 | |
| Serinyl-threonine | 2.59E-06 | 6.49E-06 | 0.33 | 0.024 | 1.497 | |
| 2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | 8.11E-03 | 4.49E-02 | 0.31 | 0.034 | 1.500 | |
| Hippuric acid | 1.26E-05 | 6.68E-05 | 0.18 | 0.034 | 1.229 | |
| 4-Acetamidobutanoic acid | 2.91E-06 | 1.22E-05 | 0.24 | 0.038 | 1.245 | |
| 3.32E-05 | 7.50E-05 | 0.42 | 0.040 | 1.235 | ||
| FMNH | 1.56E-03 | 3.43E-03 | 0.28 | 0.040 | 1.362 | |
| 3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | 1.88E-06 | 7.36E-06 | 0.29 | 0.042 | 1.405 | |
| Upregulation | 7,8-Dihydroneopterin | 1.59E-05 | 4.02E-06 | 3.94 | 0.000 | 2.087 |
| Androsterone sulfate | 3.93E-05 | 1.23E-05 | 3.18 | 0.000 | 2.052 | |
| 2′-Deoxyuridine | 5.54E-04 | 1.56E-04 | 3.55 | 0.000 | 1.913 | |
| Dyspropterin | 2.93E-04 | 3.64E-05 | 8.07 | 0.000 | 2.056 | |
| Hypoxanthine | 1.73E-04 | 7.91E-05 | 2.19 | 0.001 | 1.906 | |
| Pyrimidin-2-one-ribonucleoside | 9.35E-04 | 2.10E-04 | 4.45 | 0.001 | 1.822 | |
| L-Phenylalanine | 1.61E-03 | 7.89E-04 | 2.04 | 0.001 | 1.897 | |
| 1-Oleoyl-lysophosphatidic acid | 2.88E-04 | 1.18E-04 | 2.44 | 0.001 | 1.919 | |
| 11-Keto-beta-boswellic acid | 5.41E-05 | 1.45E-05 | 3.73 | 0.002 | 1.810 | |
| L-Tryptophan | 4.72E-04 | 2.58E-04 | 1.83 | 0.002 | 1.848 | |
| 2-Phenylacetamide | 3.02E-04 | 1.16E-04 | 2.61 | 0.002 | 1.957 | |
| L-Tyrosine | 1.21E-03 | 4.50E-04 | 2.68 | 0.002 | 1.948 | |
| Ribothymidine | 1.71E-04 | 7.54E-05 | 2.28 | 0.004 | 1.597 | |
| Tetradecanoylcarnitine | 7.81E-05 | 1.21E-05 | 6.44 | 0.004 | 1.893 | |
| Xanthine | 4.47E-03 | 1.87E-03 | 2.39 | 0.004 | 1.828 | |
| Thymidine | 9.74E-03 | 4.16E-03 | 2.34 | 0.005 | 1.563 | |
| 4-Deoxypyridoxine 5′-phosphate | 7.21E-05 | 2.61E-05 | 2.76 | 0.006 | 1.847 | |
| 3-(indol-3-yl)pyruvic acid | 1.46E-05 | 7.25E-06 | 2.01 | 0.006 | 1.631 | |
| 5-Aminoimidazole ribonucleotide | 6.22E-05 | 2.39E-05 | 2.61 | 0.009 | 1.659 |
CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; FC, fold change; VIP, variable importance in the projection.
Ruminal metabolite alterations to the honeycomb flavonoids supplement under heat stress conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upregulation | PG [16:0/18:1(11Z)] | 2.22E-06 | 1.03E-05 | 0.22 | 0.010 | 1.300 |
| PI [16:0/18:1(9Z)] | 2.29E-03 | 3.90E-03 | 0.59 | 0.029 | 1.307 | |
| PS (17:0/16:0) | 1.28E-05 | 2.34E-05 | 0.55 | 0.043 | 1.153 | |
| Daidzein | 5.22E-06 | 1.25E-05 | 0.42 | 0.049 | 1.196 | |
| 2-Methylisoborneol | 1.46E-04 | 2.49E-04 | 0.58 | 0.052 | 1.186 | |
| PE (14:0/14:0) | 1.47E-05 | 2.99E-05 | 0.49 | 0.059 | 2.687 | |
| Serinyl-threonine | 5.67E-05 | 1.21E-04 | 0.47 | 0.070 | 1.258 | |
| Methadone | 1.56E-03 | 3.56E-03 | 0.44 | 0.042 | 1.828 | |
| Herculin | 9.09E-05 | 2.15E-04 | 0.42 | 0.035 | 1.227 | |
| 9(S)-HOTrE | 1.30E-05 | 3.15E-05 | 0.41 | 0.048 | 1.467 | |
| Downregulation | Prolyl-asparagine | 6.98E-03 | 3.26E-03 | 2.15 | 0.030 | 1.979 |
| Dyspropterin | 1.31E-04 | 3.53E-05 | 3.71 | 0.036 | 1.669 | |
| N-Acetyl-D-muramoate | 1.58E-04 | 7.32E-05 | 2.16 | 0.039 | 1.828 | |
| N-Acetylglucosaminylasparagine | 2.55E-05 | 8.60E-06 | 2.97 | 0.040 | 3.013 | |
| Acyclovir | 1.98E-05 | 8.85E-06 | 2.24 | 0.041 | 1.131 | |
| Linoleoyl ethanolamide | 1.73E-04 | 5.99E-05 | 2.89 | 0.041 | 2.153 | |
| Rhapontigenin | 2.49E-05 | 6.82E-06 | 3.65 | 0.050 | 1.025 | |
| 7,8-Dihydroneopterin | 9.30E-06 | 3.16E-06 | 2.94 | 0.044 | 1.290 | |
| Glycerophosphocholine | 4.82E-05 | 1.35E-05 | 3.57 | 0.031 | 1.900 | |
| Tetradecanoylcarnitine | 3.55E-05 | 1.00E-05 | 3.54 | 0.024 | 1.874 |
CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; FC, fold change; VIP, variable importance in the projection; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PS, phosphatidylserine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine.
Figure 4Functional enrichment analysis on differential ruminal metabolites. (A) Functional enrichment analysis on differential ruminal metabolites between CON and HS treatments. CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; p < 0.05 was considered as significant difference. (B) Functional enrichment analysis on differential ruminal metabolites after honeycomb flavonoids supplement under heat stress conditions. CON, control treatment; HS, heat stress treatment; p < 0.05 was considered as significant difference.