| Literature DB >> 35372207 |
Noureen Saeed1, Mohammad Zeeshan1, Joveria Farooqi1, Sadia Shakoor1, Kausar Jabeen1, Faisal Riaz Malik1, Jason Rao2, Rumina Hasan1,3.
Abstract
Introduction: Quality-assured antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) depends upon the knowledge and skills of laboratory staff. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan, such types of knowledge and skills are limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use openaccess online courses to improve the knowledge of laboratory staff involved in the detection and reporting of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methodology: Seven online modules comprising 22 courses aimed at strengthening the laboratory detection of Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) were developed. The courses were uploaded onto the website www.parn.org.pk. Participants had an option of selecting courses of their interest. Online registration and completion of a pre-course assessment (pre-test) were essential for enrolment. However, participation in post-course assessment (post-test) was optional. The number of registered participants and the proportion of participants who completed each course were computed. A paired t-test was used to assess the increase between mean pre- and post-test scores. The association between the participants working in public vs. private laboratories and course completion rates were determined using the chi-square test.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial sensitivity testing; laboratory practice; laboratory strengthening; open online course; resource limited settings
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35372207 PMCID: PMC8965000 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.773704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
List of modules and the courses offered.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Objectives: | Good laboratory practices for AST | Describes practices to ensure safe, reliable, reproducible and quality laboratory results |
| Culture media used in AST | Discusses types of culture media used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing | |
| Disc diffusion method for AST | Describes and demonstrates method for performing AST using disc diffusion method | |
| MIC by agar dilution and E test methods | Describes and demonstrates performance of minimum inhibitory concentration using agar and Epsilometer (E-test) based methods | |
| MIC by broth dilution method | Describes and demonstrates performance of minimum inhibitory concentration using broth dilution method | |
| Recent advances in AST | Discusses recent innovations and automation in antimicrobial susceptibility testing | |
|
| ||
| Objectives: | Good Laboratory Practice and waste management | Principals of good laboratory practices including safe management and disposal of laboratory waste shared |
| Biosafety cabinets | Explains uses of different classes of biosafety cabinets | |
| Risk Groups of Microorganisms and biosafety levels | Lists categories of microorganisms based on pathogenicity and biosafety level facilities required for their handling | |
|
| ||
| Objectives: | AST quality standards | Explains international guidelines for selecting AST methods, result interpretation and reporting |
| Quality control strains | Discusses uses and role of control organisms recommended in performing AST procedures | |
| ATCC strains storage and revival guidelines | Outlines standardized storage and procedure for sub-culturing of quality control strains toward preventing loss of strain viability | |
|
| ||
| Objectives: | Introduction to quality management system | Describes definition of quality management system and categories of processes involved |
| Quality management system part II | Details organization, quality control procedures and quality indicators | |
| Quality management system part III | Explains record keeping, documentation, errors and incident management | |
|
| ||
| Objectives: | Antibiogram and their preparation | Discusses the principles and uses of antibiogram and describes steps involved in their preparation |
|
| ||
| Objectives: | Collection of specimens for bacterial culture | Describes the appropriate procedures required in collection of samples for bacterial culture |
| Transport of specimen and receipt in the laboratory | Emphasizes the need for safe and rapid transport of clinical specimens from point of collection to clinical laboratories. Specimen acceptance and rejection guidelines are discussed. | |
| Processing of specimens for bacterial culture | Describes the steps used in processing specimen for bacterial culture and outlines the procedures for different specimen types. | |
| Identification of pathogens and reporting culture results | Describes methods used in identification of pathogens. Basic principles for culture and sensitivity reporting are outlined. | |
|
| ||
| Objectives: | Nonculture based techniques part I | Defines serological techniques for diagnosis of bacterial infections |
| Nonculture-based technique part II | ||
Enrolment frequency and completion rates for different courses and an improvement in pre- and post-course test scores among different courses are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | Good laboratory practices for AST | 165 | 77 (46.7) | 56.7 (28.6) | 83.7 (17.1) | 26.93 | 20.73–33.14 | <0.001* |
| 2 | Culture media used in AST | 35 | 31 (88.6) | 46.0 (35.7) | 85.7 (20.1) | 39.65 | 26.29–53.00 | <0.001* |
| 3 | Disc diffusion method for AST | 50 | 30 (60.0) | 58.3 (28.0)) | 81.3 (29.6) | 23.07 | 11.65–34.49 | <0.001* |
| 4 | MIC by agar dilution and E test methods | 36 | 25 (69.4) | 48.8 (31.7) | 89.6 (20.9) | 40.80 | 27.01–54.59 | <0.001* |
| 5 | MIC by broth dilution method | 29 | 24 (82.8) | 54.2 (38.9) | 92.5 (17.5) | 38.33 | 22.80–53.87 | <0.001* |
| 6 | Recent advances in AST | 31 | 25 (80.6) | 35.2 (40.9) | 87.2 (22.3) | 52.00 | 33.24–70.77 | <0.001* |
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | GLP and waste management | 54 | 17 (31.5) | 41.8 (16.7) | 86.2 (17.9) | 44.47 | 30.49–58.46 | <0.001* |
| 2 | Biosafety Cabinets | 46 | 33 (71.7) | 46.7 (35.9) | 87.9 (22.9) | 41.21 | 28.81–53.62 | <0.001* |
| 3 | Microorganisms risk groups & biosafety levels | 30 | 27 (90.0) | 58.1 (30.6) | 87.7 (18.3) | 29.63 | 18.20–41.06 | <0.001* |
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | AST quality standards | 7 | 6 (85.7) | 26.7 (37.2) | 81.7 (24.0) | 55.00 | 12.11–97.89 | 0.022* |
| 2 | Quality control strains | 6 | 4 (66.7) | 40.0 (40.0) | 95.0 (10.0) | 55.00 | −5.24–115.24 | 0.062 |
| 3 | ATCC strains storage, revival, and subculture guidelines | 8 | 5 (62.5) | 36.0 (35.8) | 84.0 (20.7) | 48.00 | 7.38–88.62 | 0.030* |
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | Introduction to quality management system | 9 | 5 (55.6) | 64.0 (26.8) | 78.0 (22.8) | 14.00 | −30.42–58.42 | 0.431 |
| 2 | Quality management system II | 6 | 4 (66.7) | 65.0 (30.0) | 83.0 (22.7) | 18.00 | −54.85–90.85 | 0.489 |
| 3 | Quality management system III | 6 | 5 (83.3) | 48.0 (22.8) | 86.0 (16.7) | 38.00 | 19.58–56.42 | 0.005* |
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | Antibiogram | 7 | 4 (57.1) | 25.0 (43.6) | 97.5 (5.0) | 72.50 | 5.78–139.22 | 0.041* |
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | Collection of specimens for bacterial culture | 7 | 5 (71.4) | 60.0 (29.2) | 84.0 (26.1) | 24.00 | −17.74–65.74 | 0.186 |
| 2 | Transport of specimens for bacterial culture | 2 | 2 (100) | 65.0 (21.2) | 90.0 (14.1) | 25.00 | −292.66–342.66 | 0.500 |
| 3 | Specimen processing for bacterial culture | 2 | 1 (50.0) | 80 (28.3) | 100 (-) | 20.00 | - | - |
| 4 | Identification of pathogens and reporting culture results | 3 | 2 (66.7) | 55.0 (21.2) | 100 (0) | 45.00 | −145.59–235.59 | 0.205 |
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | Non-culture-based techniques I | 2 | 2 (100) | 60 (0) | 80 (0) | 20.00 | - | - |
| 2 | Non-culture- based techniques II | 2 | 2 (100) | 70.0 (28.3) | 80.0 (0) | 10.00 | −244.12–264.12 | 0.705 |
Courses were completed by less than two participants, and no variance in scores was excluded from a statistical analysis.
*The courses achieved a statistically significant improvement in mean test scores.
**Participation in the post-course test was used as a measure of course completion.
Figure 1Microbiology massive online open courses (MOOCs) participation from the different parts of the country.
Open online course (OOC) penetration and completion across public and private sectors: details of 157 participants working in laboratories in Pakistan.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Urban | 104 (90.4) | 37 (100) | 0.051 |
| Rural | 11 (9.6) | 0 (0) | |
|
| |||
| Punjab | 82 (71.3) | 7 (18.9) | <0.001¥ |
| Sindh | 23 ( | 26 (70.3) | |
| Baluchistan | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | |
| KPK | 5 (4.3) | 3 (11.1) | |
| AJK | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | |
| Federal Capital | 2 (1.7) | 1 (2.7) | |
| Abroad | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0) | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Good laboratory practices in AST | 80 (67.8) | 29 (74.4) | 0.441 |
| Completion | 57 (71.2) | 5 (17.2) | <0.001¥ |
| Culture media used in AST | 29 (24.6) | 5 (12.8) | 0.122 |
| Completion | 28 (96.6) | 2 (40.0) | <0.001¥ |
| AST by disc diffusion method | 31 (26.3) | 10 (25.6) | 0.938 |
| Completion | 23 (74.2) | 3 (30.0) | 0.012¥ |
| MIC by Agar dilution and E-test method | 29 (24.6) | 4 (10.3) | 0.057 |
| Completion** | 24 (82.8) | 0 (0) | 0.003¥ |
| MIC by broth dilution method | 25 (21.2) | 3 (7.7) | 0.056 |
| Completion** | 23 (92.0) | 0 (0) | 0.003¥ |
| Recent advances in AST | 27 (22.9) | 3 (7.7) | 0.036¥ |
| Completion | 23 (85.2) | 1 (33.3) | 0.033¥ |
|
| |||
| Good laboratory practices and waste management | 45 (38.1) | 4 (10.3) | 0.001¥ |
| Completion** | 16 (35.6) | 0 (0) | 0.289 |
| Biosafety cabinets | 41 (34.7) | 3 (7.7) | 0.001¥ |
| Completion | 31 (75.6) | 1 (33.3) | 0.112 |
| Organisms risk groups and biosafety levels | 27 (22.9) | 2 (5.1) | 0.013¥ |
| Completion** | 25 (92.6) | 2 (100) | 1.000 |
|
| 6 (5.1) | 1 (2.6) | 0.508 |
| Completion** | 5 (83.3) | 1 (100) | 1.000 |
*Data from the 157 participants whose affiliation was available were included.
**Fisher exact test was run instead of chi-square due to empty cells in a 2 × 2 table.
.
The text in bold represents the total counts and overall rates for the respective categories and the rows below them represent the subcategory distributions.