| Literature DB >> 35372105 |
Epp Sepp1, Imbi Smidt1, Tiiu Rööp1, Jelena Štšepetova1, Siiri Kõljalg1, Marika Mikelsaar1, Indrek Soidla2, Mare Ainsaar2, Helgi Kolk3,4, Mirjam Vallas5, Madis Jaagura6, Reet Mändar1.
Abstract
The composition of centenarians' gut microbiota has consistently been used as a model for healthy aging studies. However, there is an incomplete understanding of how childhood living conditions and eating habits affect the development and composition of gastrointestinal microbiota in centenarians with good cognitive functions. We compared the gut microbiota as well as the living and eating habits of the oldest-old group and the young people group. The richness and diversity of microbiota and the abundance of hereditary and environmental microbes were higher in people with longevity than young people. People with longevity ate more potatoes and cereal products. In their childhood, they had more exposure to farm animals and did not have sewers compared with young people. Young people's gut microbiota contained more butyrate-producing bacteria and bacteria that characterized an animal-based Western diet. These results expand our understanding of the effects of childhood environment and diet on the development and stability of the microbiota in people with longevity.Entities:
Keywords: childhood environment; eating habits; good cognitive function; gut enterotype; microbiota of centenarians
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35372105 PMCID: PMC8965453 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.851404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Basic characteristics and living environment of the study subjects.
| Groups | Oldest-old (n=25) | Young (n=25) | p- value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grouping characteristic | ||||
|
| <0.001 | |||
| min-max | 96-105 | 19-23 | ||
| median | 99 | 20 | ||
| mean | 99 | 21 | ||
| Sex | Female/Male | 18/7 | 13/12 | 0.244 |
| During the study | ||||
|
| 0.005 | |||
| alone | 13 | 8 | ||
| with spouse | 4 | 4 | ||
| with family | 5 | 4 | ||
| with peers | 0 | 9 | ||
| in nursing home | 3 | 0 | ||
|
| 0.065 | |||
| min-max | 19.1-35.1 | 17.8-32.4 | ||
| median | 26 | 23.2 | ||
| mean | 25.4 | 23.6 | ||
| First 5 years of life (number of people) | ||||
|
| 0.604 | |||
| min-max | 3-11 | 2-7 | ||
| median | 4 | 4 | ||
| mean | 4.8 | 4.1 | ||
|
| <0.001 | |||
| farm | 19 | 3 | ||
| pet | 4 | 14 | ||
| no | 2 | 8 | ||
|
| <0.001 | |||
| yes | 0 | 25 | ||
| no | 25 | 0 | ||
|
| <0.001 | |||
| yes | 1 | 25 | ||
| no | 24 | 0 | ||
*Wilcoxon rank sum test for BMI, Fisher’s exact test for remaining characteristics.
Figure 1Richness of microbiota (A), diversity of microbiota (B), and abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria (C) in the oldest-old and young groups.
Figure 2Distribution of enterotypes in the oldest-old and young groups (NMDS, non-metric multidimensional scaling).
Figure 3Relative abundance of gut microorganisms in the oldest-old and young groups at the phylum level (A) and family level (B).
Figure 4Differences at the genus level of the intestinal microbiota in the oldest-old and young groups.
Figure 5The correlation between different bacterial abundance in the oldest-old and young groups (associations which were statistically significant without adjustment for multiple comparisons are designated by an asterisk).