| Literature DB >> 35371455 |
Ana Huerta1, Eva Mérida2, Laura Medina3, Maria Fernandez4, Eduardo Gutierrez2, Eduardo Hernandez2, Paula López-Sánchez1, Angel Sevillano2, Jose Portolés1, Hernan Trimarchi5, Manuel Praga2.
Abstract
Background: A randomized controlled trial demonstrated a beneficial effect of corticosteroids (CS) + cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine in progressive immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN). Although treatment with CS and mycophenolic acid analogues (MPAAs) remains controversial in IgAN, there is no information about their effects in progressive IgAN.Entities:
Keywords: GFR; IgA nephropathy; haematuria; immunosuppression; proteinuria
Year: 2021 PMID: 35371455 PMCID: PMC8967683 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Kidney J ISSN: 2048-8505
Baseline characteristics of patients (N = 25)
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 38.6 ± 17.7 |
| Male, | 16 (64.0) |
| Ethnic origin, | |
| White | 22 |
| Asiatic | 2 |
| Latin American | 1 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean ± SD | 129.3 ± 14.8 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean ± SD | 76.6 ± 10.1 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL), mean ± SD | 1.7 ± 0.4 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), median (IQR) | 48.7 (34–67) |
| Proteinuria (g/day), median (IQR) | 1.8 (1–2.5) |
| Haematuria, | 25 (100) |
| Renal biopsy, | |
| M1 | 11 (52.4) |
| E1 | 11 (52.4) |
| S1 | 13 (61.9) |
| T1 | 1 (4.8) |
| T2 | 1 (4.8) |
| C1 | 10 (47.6) |
| C2 | 3 (14.3) |
M1, mesangial hypercellularity; E1, endocapillary hypercellularity; S1, segmental glomerulosclerosis; T1: tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis >25%; T2: tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis >25%.
Available in 21 patients.
Change in eGFR slope before and after CS + MPAA treatment
| 12 months prior to baseline ( | From baseline to the last visit with CS + MPAA treatment ( | From baseline to the last visit with CS + MPAA treatment ( | From the last visit with CS + MPAA treatment to end of follow-up ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | ||||
| eGFR slope (mL/min/1.73 m2/year) | –23 (–32 to –16) | 5 (3–9)* | 4 (3–8) | –2.1 (–6.4 to –0.6)**, *** |
*P = 0.001 and **P = 0.001 compared with the eGFR slope between baseline and the last visit with CS + MPAA treatment and ***P = 0.001 compared with the eGFR slope in the 12 months prior to baseline.
Evolution of eGFR, proteinuria and haematuria in all patients (N = 25)
| Characteristics | –12 months | Baseline | 1 month | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | Last visit with CS + MPAA treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), median (IQR) | 80.7 (60–99)*** | 48.7 (34–67) | 49.4 (36.8–75.0) | 58.0 (40.5–84.0)* | 59.8 (36.1–92.5)** | 65.0 (36.0–92.0)** | 64.0 (33.4–90.0)* |
| Proteinuria (g/day), median (IQR) | 0.8 (0–2.0) | 1.8 (1.0–2.5) | 1.4 (0.9–2.5) | 1.0 (0.6–1.3)*** | 0.6 (0.4–1.1)*** | 0.5 (0.3–0.8)*** | 0.6 (0.3–1.2)*** |
| Patients with haematuria, | 25 (100) | 25 (100) | 25 (100) | 22 (88.0) | 16 (64.0)* | 15 (60.0)*** | 15 (60.0)*** |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 with respect to baseline values.
FIGURE 1:Individual changes in the eGFR before and after the onset of CS + MPAA treatment.
FIGURE 2:Individual changes in proteinuria before and after the onset of CS + MPAA treatment.
Changes in kidney function, proteinuria and haematuria after the withdrawal of CS + MPAA treatment (N = 21)
| Characteristics | Last visit with CS + MPAA treatment | End of follow-up |
|---|---|---|
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), median (IQR) | 64.0 (38.4–90.0) | 54.0 (19.0–80.0)* |
| Proteinuria (g/day), median (IQR) | 0.6 (0.3–1.1) | 0.7 (0.3–1.5) |
| Patients with haematuria, | 12 (57.1) | 14 (66.7) |
*P = 0.002.