Literature DB >> 35371387

The COVID-19 Vaccines: A Description of Adverse Events of Reactions Reported in Kansas.

Kale Mills1, Anna Tri2, Kari Nilsen1,3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has spread rapidly throughout the world since its discovery in 2019. Three vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna/NIAID/BARDA, and Johnson & Johnson's Janssen) have been developed for use in the U.S. to aid in the fight against this virus, but have been scrutinized intensely for their efficacy and safety. It is important to understand and interpret the adverse events or reactions (AERs) associated with these vaccines in an objective and analytical manner. The goal of this descriptive study was to provide a resource outlining AERs associated with the three available vaccines in Kansas.
Methods: Reports were obtained from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), representing AERs observed in Kansas from December 11, 2020 to May 13, 2021. All data were screened and coded, and descriptive statistics were used to describe AERs based on vaccine manufacturer, patient age and biological sex, and reported deaths.
Results: Only 0.00068% of COVID-19 vaccine doses given in Kansas were associated with an AER (1,445/2,120,350). There were 4,297 individual AERs reported, and the most common were fatigue/tiredness (266; 6.2%), tingling/itching (251; 5.9%), fever (226; 5.3%), hives (223; 5.2%), and muscle/joint pain (209; 4.9%). Only 0.002% of COVID-19 vaccine doses in Kansas were associated with a death (38/2,120,350). The majority of VAERS reports were by females (1,139; 78.8%) and those aged 30 to 39 years (297; 20.6%). Conclusions: No reported AERs were unexpected compared to national data, and no VAERs report provided a causal relationship between vaccine administration and death. Vaccines are, and will continue to be, essential tools to fight COVID-19 in the quest to reach herd immunity. Providing a resource of potential AERs could aid in individual decisions to receive a vaccine and may help in the control of COVID-19. Future studies may include describing reported AERs for children under age 12 as the vaccines become available for those age groups, as well as reporting AERs for those who have received the vaccine after our study time period.
© 2022 The University of Kansas Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 vaccines; Kansas; adverse drug events; vaccination; vaccination refusal

Year:  2022        PMID: 35371387      PMCID: PMC8942589          DOI: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.15825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kans J Med        ISSN: 1948-2035


INTRODUCTION

On December 31, 2019, a respiratory virus of unknown etiology was detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province of China and reported to the World Health Organization.1 The virus, called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was linked to the development of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), more commonly referred to as the “coronavirus” or “COVID-19.” This novel coronavirus spread rapidly in the first months of 2020, with the first reported case in the U.S. on January 21, 2020. By March 20, 2020 there were a total of 250,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide. As of August 31, 2021, the confirmed global case count of COVID-19 was more than 217.3 million people infected, with over 4.5 million deaths. In the U.S., there have been approximately 39.1 million confirmed cases and over 639,000 deaths.2 Due to the morbidity and mortality rates associated with the proliferation of the virus, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) launched a program called “Operation Warp Speed” to collaborate with the private sector to develop and distribute a vaccine to be used against COVID-19 quickly and effectively on March 30, 2020.3 On December 11, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the first COVID-19 vaccine approved for use in the U.S., manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech.4 An EUA is awarded by the FDA when the public health benefit of a medical product, such as a vaccine, outweighs the known and potential harm.5 Officially named “Comirnaty” with the international non-proprietary name (INN) “tozinameran”, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is colloquially known as the “Pfizer vaccine”.4 With an efficacy rate of up to 95%, the Pfizer vaccine was approved conditionally for use in persons aged 16 and older in the U.S. and requires two doses given three weeks apart.6–8 Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been monitoring reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination, however, no suspension or pause in the use of the Pfizer vaccine has been issued.9 On December 18, 2020, just a week after the authorization of the Pfizer vaccine, a second COVID-19 vaccine from Moderna Therapeutics, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) also received an EUA. The Moderna/NIAID/BARDA vaccine has the brand name “SpikeVax”, INN “elasomeran”, and is colloquially known as the “Moderna vaccine”. This vaccine requires two doses to achieve a vaccine efficacy of 94.1%; however, the Moderna vaccine only was authorized for use in individuals 18 years of age and older.7 On June 25, 2021, the FDA revised fact sheets related to the Moderna vaccine and disclosed that there may be an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination, but this issue did not halt the FDA’s EUA.10 On February 27, 2021, the FDA released the EUA for Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen single dose COVID-19 vaccine (INN Ad26.COV2.S) colloquially known as the “J&J vaccine”.11 This marked the third vaccine approved for use in the U.S.12 Following use for more than a month, the CDC and FDA recommended a temporary suspension for the use of the J&J vaccine on April 13, 2021, due to reports of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) in vaccinated individuals, particularly women under age 50.13,14 After a thorough safety review of the vaccine and the rare cases of CVST, the FDA and CDC lifted the pause on April 23, 2021.15 Although shown to be effective in combatting COVID-19, the J&J vaccine has a slightly lower efficacy than the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines at 66.3%.16 Under the FDA’s EUAs for the three vaccines, vaccine manufacturers and health care providers (such as local health departments, physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) who are administering the COVID-19 vaccines were mandated to report serious adverse events or reactions (AERs) that occur from any of the three vaccines through the DHHS’s “Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System” (VAERS), which is comanaged by the FDA and CDC, and accessible through the public resource, WONDER (Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research).17 Serious AERs are defined by VAERS as: Death; a life-threatening adverse event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; a congenital anomaly/birth defect; an important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above; cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome; cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death.17 Health care providers are also encouraged to report any other AERs they observe in patients that they can reasonably conclude are due to the vaccine administered. Individuals from the general public can report their AERs directly to the vaccination manufacturer or their health care provider, who are mandated to report the AERs to VAERS, or the person can report their vaccine side effects directly to VAERS by logging into the system and creating a report themselves.17 Due to the fact that the general public can report unverifiable AERs to the VAERS system, these reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to the reported AERs and the threat of conviction under Federal law for submitting a fabricated report may not deter people from submitting false reports. The strengths of the VAERS system are that it can be used to detect unusual or unexpected patterns (“safety signals”) that can be followed in a strategic manner, and VAERS staff regularly can monitor and remove entries made by the general public that cannot be verified. This project was of interest due to the concerns regarding the potential side effects of the three COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use in the U.S. Data obtained for this study from the VAERS database provides the information needed to describe reported AERs, and specifically, this study was intended to provide a resource regarding potential AERs associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech (Pfizer), Moderna/NIAID/ BARDA (Moderna), and Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen (J&J) COVID-19 vaccines in the State of Kansas.

METHODS

The VAERS database was searched from vaccine inception on December 11, 2020 to May 13, 2021 for AERs related to the three COVID-19 vaccines. The study team chose this ending date as it was the day prior to the Pfizer vaccine receiving FDA EUA approval for use in adolescents 12 to 15 years old.18 Results were grouped by vaccine manufacturer, whether the impacted patient resided in Kansas, patient age and gender, and included information on AER description, as well as any relevant or available data regarding labs, current illnesses, AERs after prior vaccinations, medications at time of vaccination, and medical history and/or allergies. The full description of the search strategy is available from the authors upon request. This study was approved by the University of Kansas School of Medicine Institutional Review Board as non-humans subject research.

Data Screening

The search identified 1,705 separate patient entries in VAERS. The initial data file was screened by two of the authors (AT and KN) for entries that needed to be removed. KN initially removed 270 entries and AT initially removed 239 entries, with an agreement rate of 96.3%. After discussion, a consensus was reached to remove 222 entries (Cohen’s k = 0.85, p = 0.16, 95% CI −0.7% to 4.1%). Entries were removed for four reasons, “unknown” vaccine manufacturer (four removed), report of unapproved underage administration (23 removed), duplicate entries (15 removed), and those entries that were not COVID-19 vaccine related AERs (180 removed). The break-down of the screening criteria by vaccine manufacturer is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

VAERS COVID-19 vaccine entry data screening procedure.

PfizerModernaJ&JTotal
Removed “unknown” vaccines---------4
Start 676 818 207 1,701
 Removed - underage administration191323
 Removed - duplicate report85215
 Removed - not COVID vaccine AER1025820180
Total after non-AER entries removed 565 746 172 1,483
 Removed if death was indicated1618438
Of the 180 entries related to the COVID-19 vaccines that did not indicate an AER occurred: 68 reported a patient had a positive COVID-19 diagnosis but no vaccine AER; 60 reported an unauthorized use of the vaccine (e.g., incorrect dose, incorrect vaccine given for second dose); 21 had another diagnosis after vaccination that accounted for the report (e.g., ruptured appendix, strep throat); 19 were unclear as to the specific AER experienced (e.g., “seen at ER”, “just didn’t feel right”); 11 were unremarkable clinic progress notes of follow-up calls to patients who had received a vaccination; and one was removed because the submitter indicated it was a report based on a friend’s social media post. This left a total of 1,483 separate patient entries. Thirty-eight entries that reported the patient’s death were removed and discussed separately below. This left a total of 1,445 VAERS entries to be coded by the research team.

Data Coding

Each VAERS entry was screened by one of the three authors, coded by another, and reviewed by the third, with a rotating list of entries for each author, ensuring that each entry was seen and checked by all three members of the authorship team. Any entries that were unclear were resolved by discussion. Each identified AER that appeared two or more times was coded into a separate category, for a total of 58 identified categories of AERs related to the COVID-19 vaccines. Twenty-eight category names utilized wording obtained from the side effects listed on the information sheets provided by the manufacturer for each vaccine.19–21 The additional 30 categories were named based on medical and lay terms for the AER identified (i.e., arrythmia/ abnormal heart rhythm). Additionally, there was a category named “other” for 16 individual entries that did not fall into the identified AER categories. Within all 59 categories there were a total of 4,287 separate AERs reported. Table 2 shows the AER categories identified with the breakdown of number of coded entries in each.
Table 2

COVID-19 vaccine reported adverse events or reactions categories identified from 1,445 patient entries.

TotalPfizerModernaJ&J
Fatigue/tiredness 266 8414438
Tingling/itching 251 8015318
Fever 226 1216351
Hives 223 181996
Muscle/joint pain 209 136667
Nausea 189 798822
Headache 187 126655
Chills/shaking 175 1012648
Confusion 175 81652
Seizure 174 81633
Rash 146 50906
Numbness 142 211129
Dizziness 136 107326
Bruising at injection site 133 41245
Redness at injection site 131 251015
Dyspnea/hypoxia (Shortness of breath) 118 171010
Pain at injection site 98 573011
Eye pain 88 8215
Arrythmia (abnormal heart rhythm) 81 313416
Weakness 76 293611
Blood clot 75 1713
Syncope (lightheadedness/fainting) 75 283413
Diaphoresis (sweating) 70 243412
Vomiting 69 193614
Sore throat 65 5186
Diarrhea 60 20346
Cough/congestion 56 34166
Lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes) 56 23294
Arm pain 54 32616
Xerostomia (dry mouth) 52 39310
Insomnia 51 8376
Allergic reaction 47 24158
Chest pain 46 3529
Sensory issue/loss 36 10206
Difficultly walking 30 2253
Anxiety/panic/depression 27 11160
Stroke 25 3211
Abdominal pain 24 11310
Ear pain/tinnitus (ringing in ears) 22 3127
Metallic taste 20 6104
Loss of appetite 11 344
Shingles 11 362
Epistaxis (nosebleed) 10 703
Bell’s palsy 9 360
Hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) 6 141
Herpes labialis (cold sores) 5 230
Edema 5 230
Hematuria (blood in urine) 4 130
Vivid dreams 4 310
Gastrointestinal bleed 3 030
Myocardial infarction (heart attack) 3 030
Paralysis 3 210
Pneumonia 3 210
Asthma attack 2 110
Hallucinations/delusions 2 101
Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) 2 110
Thrombocytopenia (low blood platelets) 2 200
Unexpected vaginal bleeding 2 110
Other 16 646
Total 4,287 1,500 2,222 565

Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe AERs reported by vaccine manufacturer (Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J), age category (29 and younger, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 64, and 65 and older), and gender (male and female), as well as any reported deaths in the data file. Traditional statistical analyses were not performed beyond calculating the inter-rater reliability as this is a purely descriptive study of reported AERs and causal inferences are unable to be performed due to the nature of the VAERS system.

RESULTS

Information from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) was obtained to determine how many people in Kansas had received at least one dose of the available COVID-19 vaccines (Andrea May, MPH, email communication, June 2021). From December 11, 2020 to May 13, 2021, the KDHE indicated that a total of 1,191,204 initial vaccine doses had been given, which translated to approximately 41% of the total population receiving at least one dose (1,191,204/2,911,641). VAERS did not indicate if someone submitted multiple reports, but this roughly indicated that for each vaccine dose given in Kansas, one in every 1,467 led to a report in VAERS (2,120,350/1,445), and one AER occurred per every 495 doses given in Kansas (2,120,350/4,287; Table 3). Of the 1,445 VAERS entries, 215 (14.9%) concerned patients younger than 29 years, 297 (20.6%) were age 30 to 39 years, 277 (19.2%) were between 40 and 49 years, 230 (15.9%) were age 50 to 59 years, 118 (8.2%) were age 60 to 64 years, and 263 (18.2%) were 65 years and older. Twenty-five entries had no age noted. In terms of gender, 296 (20.5%) entries reported male patients, 1,139 (78.8%) female patients, and 10 were unknown gender (0.7%).
Table 3

COVID-19 vaccines given in Kansas (December 11, 2020 to May 13, 2021).

PfizerModernaJ&JTotal
Total doses 1,130,089 922,728 67,308 2,120,350
 Dose 1624,528499,80867,3081,191,056
 Dose 2505,561422,920---929,069
Unknown vaccine received---------225
Prevalence
 VAERS entry (one per every)2,058 doses1,267 doses401 doses1,467 doses
 AER (one per every)753 doses415 doses119 doses495 doses

Adverse Events or Reactions Reported

Overall, there were a total of 4,287 AERs reported, with an average of 3.0 (± 1.9) AERs reported per VAERS entry, with a median number of 3 (range 1 to 12). The Pfizer vaccine had a total of 1,500 AERs reported with an average of 2.7 (± 1.8) AERs per patient entry, with a median number of 2 (range 1 to 11). The Moderna vaccine had a total of 2,222 AERs reported with an average of 3.1 (± 1.9) AERs reported per patient entry, with a median number of 3 (range 1 to 10). The J&J vaccine had a total of 565 AERs reported, with an average of 3.4 (± 2.0) AERs per patient entry, with a median number of 3 (range 1 to 12). Table 2 shows the breakdown of each AER by vaccine manufacturer.

Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine

The Pfizer vaccine had a total of 549 entries in the VAERS system as of May 13, 2021, and 1,500 separate AERs. Of these entries, 92 (16.8%) included patients younger than 29 years, 117 (21.3%) were age 30 to 39 years, 93 (16.9%) were between 40 and 49 years, 91 (16.6%) were age 50 to 59 years, 37 (6.7%) were age 60 to 64 years, and 92 (16.8%) entries were 65 years and older. Twenty-seven had no age noted. In terms of gender, 103 (18.8%) were male patients, 1,139 (80.3%) were female patients, and 5 (0.9%) were unknown gender. The highest AER count was in female patients aged 30 to 39 reporting muscle/joint pain. The top five AERs for age and gender are shown in Tables 4 and 5.
Table 4

Top five reported adverse events or reactions for each COVID-19 vaccine by age group.

Pfizer VaccineModerna VaccineJ&J Vaccine
AERn%AERn%AERn%
29 years and younger Muscle/joint pain3740.2%Hives2426.4%Fever, headache*1443.8%
Headache2729.3%Confusion2325.3%Muscle/joint pain1340.6%
Nausea2122.8%Fever2224.2%Chills/shaking1031.3%
Fatigue, dizziness*1718.5%Numbness2022.0%Dizziness618.8%
Eye pain1516.3%Fatigue, seizure*1819.8%Chest pain, fatigue*515.6%
30 to 39 years Muscle/joint pain4639.3%Hives4431.2%Muscle/joint pain2256.4%
Chills/shaking2823.9%Confusion4028.4%Headache1948.7%
Headache2622.2%Seizure3726.2%Fever1230.8%
Eye pain, fatigue*2319.7%Tingling/itching3323.4%Chills/shaking1128.2%
Dizziness2218.8%Fever3222.7%Fatigue923.1%
40 to 49 years Muscle/joint pain3234.4%Hives4629.7%Muscle/joint pain1034.5%
Headache2223.7%Seizure4126.5%Fatigue931.0%
Chills/shaking2122.6%Tingling/itching3723.9%Headache724.1%
Dizziness, eye pain*1718.3%Fatigue3522.6%Chills/shaking, fever, pain at injection site*620.7%
Tingling/itching1516.1%Numbness3321.3%Arm pain/syncope*517.2%
50 to 59 years Muscle/joint pain4145.1%Hives4034.8%Muscle/joint pain833.3%
Headache2527.5%Confusion3127.0%Chills/shaking, headache*729.2%
Tingling/itching2123.1%Fatigue3026.1%Fatigue, tingling/itching*625.0%
Dizziness1819.8%Bruising at injection site2925.2%Dizziness, fever*520.8%
Chills/shaking1314.3%Fever2824.3%Ear pain/tinnitus416.7%
60 to 64 years Muscle/joint pain1027.0%Fever1827.3%Fever426.7%
Nausea616.2%Hives1725.8%Muscle/joint pain426.7%
Dizziness, headache, tingling/itching*513.5%Confusion1421.2%Nausea426.7%
Diarrhea/fatigue/pain at injection site/rash*410.8%Fatigue, seizure, tingling/itching*1319.7%Chills/shaking, headache*320.0%
Arm pain, cough/congestion, difficulty walking/weakness*38.1%Dyspnea/hypoxia, nausea913.6%Abdominal pain, dizziness, numbness/weakness*213.3%
65 years and older Dizziness2729.3%Tingling/itching3825.5%Muscle/joint pain940.9%
Muscle/joint pain2021.7%Seizure3221.5%Chills/shaking836.4%
Headache1415.2%Fever3020.1%Fatigue731.8%
Chills/shaking1314.1%Hives2617.4%Fever627.3%
Eye pain1213.0%Confusion2416.1%Headache522.7%
Total Muscle/joint pain19635.7%Hives19727.1%Muscle/joint pain6739.9%
Headache12522.8%Confusion16422.5%Headache5532.7%
Dizziness10719.5%Fever16322.4%Fever5130.4%
Chills/shaking10018.2%Seizure16122.1%Chills/shaking4828.6%
Fatigue8214.9%Tingling/itching15220.9%Fatigue3822.6%

Tie between reported AER type.

Table 5

Top five reported adverse events or reactions for each COVID-19 vaccine by gender.

Pfizer VaccineModerna VaccineJ&J Vaccine
AERn%AERn%AERn%
Male Muscle/joint pain3433.0%Fever4229.2%Muscle/joint pain, headache*1632.7%
Headache2019.4%Confusion3927.1%Chills/shaking1530.6%
Dizziness1716.5%Hives3826.4%Fever1428.6%
Eye pain, nausea*1413.6%Fatigue3322.9%Fatigue1122.4%
Chills/shaking, fatigue*1312.6%Bruising2920.1%Dizziness714.3%
Female Muscle/joint pain16236.7%Hives15927.4%Muscle/joint pain5143.2%
Headache10523.8%Seizure15025.9%Headache3933.1%
Dizziness9020.4%Tingling/itching13924.0%Fever3731.4%
Chills/shaking8719.7%Confusion12521.6%Chills/shaking3328.0%
Tingling/itching7216.3%Fever12120.9%Fatigue2722.9%
Total Muscle/joint pain19635.7%Hives19727.1%Muscle/joint pain6739.9%
Headache12522.8%Confusion16422.5%Headache5532.7%
Dizziness10719.5%Fever16322.4%Fever5130.4%
Chills/shaking10018.2%Seizure16122.1%Chills/shaking4828.6%
Fatigue8214.9%Tingling/itching15220.9%Fatigue3822.6%

Tie between reported AER type.

Moderna/NIAID/BARDA Vaccine

The Moderna vaccine had a total of 728 entries in the VAERs system as of May 13, 2021, and 2,222 separate AERs. Of these entries, 91 (12.5%) concerned patients younger than 29 years, 141 (19.4%) were age 30 to 39 years, 155 (21.3%) were between 40 and 49 years, 115 (15.8%) were age 50 to 59 years, 66 (9.1%) were age 60 to 64 years, and 149 (20.5%) were 65 years and older. Eleven had no age noted. In terms of gender, 144 (19.8%) entries were for male patients, 580 (79.7%) female patients, and 4 (0.5%) were unknown gender. The highest AER count was for female patients aged 40 to 49 who reported hives (Tables 4 and 5).

Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen Vaccine

The J&J vaccine had a total of 168 entries in the VAERs system as of May 13, 2021, and 565 separate AERs. Of the VAERS entries, 32 (19.0%) were reports for patients younger than 29 years, 39 (23.2%) were age 30 to 39, 29 (17.3%) were between 40 and 49 years, 24 (14.3%) were age 50 to 59 years, 15 (8.9%) were age 60 to 64 years, and 22 (13.1%) were 65 years and older. Seven had no age noted. In terms of gender, 49 (29.2%) entries concerned male patients, 118 (70.2%) female patients, and one (0.6%) had an unknown gender. The highest AER count was for female patients aged 30 to 39 reporting muscle/joint pain (Tables 4 and 5).

Other Adverse Events or Reactions Reported

Overall, there were 16 AERs that were outliers, meaning they were only reported in VAERS once and they did not fall into one of the 58 identified categories. There were six patients who received the Pfizer vaccine who reported “other” AERs: anemia, severe acid reflux, onychorrhexis (unexplained breaking of fingernails), flaring of Fothergill’s disease (trigeminal neuralgia), Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (apical ballooning syndrome), and development of Willis-Ekbom disease (restless leg disease). There were four patients who received the Moderna vaccine who reported either the development of pyelonephritis (kidney infection), hemorrhoids, constipation, or a report of a pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lung). There were six patient entries related to the J&J vaccine: the worsening of multiple sclerosis symptoms, polyuria (excessive urination), hormonal changes, neuralgia (burning nerve pain), an acute adrenal (Addisonian) crisis, and priapism (prolonged painful erection).

Deaths

There were 38 patient deaths identified in the VAERs system from December 20, 2020 to May 13, 2021 (38/1,483; 2.6%). Of these, 16 had received Pfizer, 18 received Moderna, and four received the J&J vaccine. No deaths were reported in patients under age 39, and the majority (11/38; 28.9%) were 65 years or older. Fifteen of these deaths were due to unknown causes at time of report, but were not suspected to be related to the vaccines; 17 deaths were related to other verifiable diagnoses, such as cancer or falls, and were also not suspected to be related to the vaccines; five deaths were related to COVID-19 complications in between vaccine doses; and one death is being reported by KDHE as related to an allergic reaction from the Pfizer vaccine. Figure 1 shows the breakdown of deaths by age group, gender, and vaccine manufacturer.
Figure 1

Number of deaths reported by age group, gender, and COVID-19 vaccine.

DISCUSSION

The information presented in this study can be used as a resource for those who are curious about the potential side effects of the three COVID-19 vaccines, especially those who may be hesitant for various reasons, such as fear of unknown risks, lack of trust in production, or personal safety. As of August 31, 2021, only 53.0% of the U.S. population and approximately 27.5% of the world population are fully vaccinated. 2 As of August 31, 2021, Kansas has had 369,890 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 5,560 COVID-19 related deaths. Vaccine rates in Kansas were also slightly higher than previously reported on May 13, 2021, with 48.2% of the population being fully vaccinated. However, with more than 50% of the population of Kansas remaining unvaccinated, this indicated that many Kansans are either unable to get vaccinated (i.e., they are underage or have medical barriers) or they are unwilling. This hesitancy also may affect parental willingness to allow their children to get vaccinated, as uncertainty regarding the adverse effects of vaccines has been cited as a major barrier to adolescent vaccination in Kansas.22 Results from a June 2020 global survey of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance indicated that 71.5% of participants would be “very or somewhat likely” to receive a vaccine.23 However, the survey results also indicated that the potential side effects and AERs related to the COVID-19 vaccines, as well as lack of trust in government and public health officials, have contributed to vaccine hesitancy. Despite the acceleration of the development of these three vaccines, the FDA has taken substantial and appropriate steps to ensure the validity and efficacy of these COVID-19 vaccines.24 Highlighting the fact that mild and likely short term side effects were present most often may aid individuals in their decision to receive a vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine mainly saw reports of mild AERs, including high incidences of muscle/joint pain and headache were somewhat consistent with manufacturer reports, with 21 of the 41 identified AERs listed on the supplied FDA fact sheet.19 A prior study by Johnston and colleagues in 2021 reported allergic and neurologic reactions associated with the Moderna vaccine, with hives and seizure commonly reported.25 Colloquially known as “COVID arm”, hives at the vaccine site frequently have been reported with the Moderna vaccine. Cases of seizure have been reported with other common vaccines, such as tetanus, pertussis, poliovirus, and influenza,26 especially in children; however, these cases were extremely rare and the vast majority of which were short and did not cause any long-term damage.27 Confusion/delirium in the Moderna vaccine, like many other AERs, may be related to the systemic inflammatory response associated with COVID-19 vaccines as this response may be associated with modification in brain physiology.28 Overall, 18 of the AERs identified in this study were indicated on the provided patient fact sheet for the Moderna vaccine, while 40 of the AERs identified were not.20 The presence of additional AERs indicated that there may be additional side effects that will need to be monitored with two mRNA vaccines. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine saw very similar AERs compared to the Pfizer vaccine. Of the AERs reported for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, 19 of the AERs we identified are listed on the patient fact sheet, while 30 were not.21,29 Additionally, no reported cases of CVST were found through the VAERS system in Kansas for the study period.15,16 Reported blood clots of any kind after receiving the vaccine were limited to just three cases total with the J&J vaccine, and unfortunately no specification of what kind of blood clot was indicated in VAERS. Additionally, on July 13, 2021, the FDA announced revisions to the fact sheets of the J&J vaccine to include an observed risk of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) following vaccination.21 These cases are again exceedingly rare among J&J vaccine recipients as only 100 out of 12.5 million recipients reported cases of GBS after J&J vaccination, and no cases were noted in this study. Most people with GBS make a full recovery and as it stands there has been no definitive causal relationship established between the J&J vaccine and GBS.30 One of the most important AERs that must be investigated rigorously was the prevalence of death among those who receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Our study reported that there were 38 deaths reported in the VAERS system from December 20, 2020 to May 13, 2021. This translated to 0.0002% (38/2,120,350) of persons in Kansas who had recieved a COVID-19 vaccine being associated with a death. None of these cases provided a causal relationship between vaccine administration and death, but there was one report that is being investigated. Given the nature of the VAERS system, it is difficult to determine relationships from the reports and data that were available; however, the FDA and CDC follow-up on any reported deaths in the VAERS system and make a further determination in conjunction with state health departments.17 When weighing the choice of receiving any sort of medication, vaccine, or health-related intervention, the benefits and the risks must be weighed in any case.31 All too often individuals suffer from omission bias, or the idea of favoring inaction over action when it comes to receiving a medical intervention, especially when it comes to vaccines. Additionally, the benefits and risks associated with other vaccines must also be considered. The flu vaccine, for instance, has common side effects including soreness, redness, and/or swelling from the shot, headache, fever, nausea, and muscle aches, which are very similar to the AERs reported with the COVID-19 vaccines.32 Combatting vaccine hesitancy is not a new phenomenon. However, given themes related to the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, such as vaccine efficacy, safety, pace of development, and fear of side effects, it is important for health care providers and public health officials to have information available as these groups play a critical role in combating vaccine hesitancy.22,33–35 Of note, only 0.00068% (1,445/2,120,350) of COVID-19 vaccine doses given from December 11, 2021 to May 13, 2021 were associated with a report in VAERS, showing a particularly low rate of reactions associated with these vaccines thus far. By providing a clear statistical overview of the AERs associated with these vaccines, this study may be utilized as a resource for individuals and their medical providers to make informed and educated decisions on whether to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS

On June 10, 2021, Moderna petitioned the FDA to approve its vaccine for adolescents aged 12 to 17; and as of August 23, 2021, the Pfizer/Biotech COVID-19 was given full approval by the FDA for use in people ages 16 and older.36 While Moderna has yet to be approved for adolescents, the EUA approval of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for those aged 12 to 17 highlighted the confidence that the FDA has in the vaccine’s efficacy and safety.18 In addition, beginning in March 2021, Pfizer/BioNTech began conducting randomized control trials in children aged 6 months to 11 years old, which hopefully will cement the “tolerability, immunogenicity, and safety” of this vaccine in virtually all age groups.37 With the first COVID-19 vaccine receiving full FDA authorization, there is the expectation that some of those who are vaccine hesitant may cease to be so. One way to combat a virus is through herd immunity.38,39 Herd immunity occurs when the majority of the population gets infected by a disease and, as a result, develops immunity and antibodies that makes the spread of the disease unlikely. Another way to reach herd immunity is through the use of vaccines. Prior to Spring 2021, when the global base reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19 remained around 2.5, herd immunity was set at approximately 60%.40 However, as the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to mutate into variants of interest (VOIs), such as the Delta variant (B.1.617.2 lineage) and Lambda variant (C.37 lineage),39 the global R0 also has been increasing and was estimated at 4.1 (95% CI, 3.09–5.39), which pushed the need for global herd immunity close to 90%.41 To approach herd immunity in the U.S., it is crucial to provide accurate and credible information to educate and encourage those who can be vaccinated to do so. The more people who can achieve natural immunity through infection (less desirable) or through vaccination (more desirable), the greater chance there is to lower the emergence of new VOIs that current vaccines may be less effective against. With the augmentation and distribution of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines, along with other mitigation efforts, the societal effects of COVID-19 will diminish. It is important for public health experts, health care providers, and elected officials to provide consistent and reliable information to the public to increase vaccine uptake.35,42 Knowing that vaccine safety is an issue contributing to vaccine hesitancy, informing the public about the potential AERs of the COVID-19 vaccines is one step closer to fulfilling that gap.
  21 in total

1.  Herd Immunity and Implications for SARS-CoV-2 Control.

Authors:  Saad B Omer; Inci Yildirim; Howard P Forman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Hesitancy Toward a COVID-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Linda Thunström; Madison Ashworth; David Finnoff; Stephen C Newbold
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 3.  A clinical perspective of sepsis-associated delirium.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tsuruta; Yasutaka Oda
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2016-03-23

4.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Current State of the First COVID-19 Vaccines.

Authors:  Birgit M Prüβ
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-08

6.  Epidemiological and cohort study finds no association between COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Stephen Keddie; Julia Pakpoor; Christina Mousele; Menelaos Pipis; Pedro M Machado; Mark Foster; Christopher J Record; Ryan Y S Keh; Janev Fehmi; Ross W Paterson; Viraj Bharambe; Lisa M Clayton; Claire Allen; Olivia Price; Jasmine Wall; Annamaria Kiss-Csenki; Devi Priya Rathnasabapathi; Ruth Geraldes; Tatyana Yermakova; Joshua King-Robson; Maya Zosmer; Sanjeev Rajakulendran; Sheetal Sumaria; Simon F Farmer; Ross Nortley; Charles R Marshall; Edward J Newman; Niranjanan Nirmalananthan; Guru Kumar; Ashwin A Pinto; James Holt; Tim M Lavin; Kathryn M Brennan; Michael S Zandi; Dipa L Jayaseelan; Jane Pritchard; Robert D M Hadden; Hadi Manji; Hugh J Willison; Simon Rinaldi; Aisling S Carr; Michael P Lunn
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  A New Vaccine to Battle Covid-19.

Authors:  Barton F Haynes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fidelia Cascini; Ana Pantovic; Yazan Al-Ajlouni; Giovanna Failla; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-09-02

9.  Warp-Speed Covid-19 Vaccine Development: Beneficiaries of Maturation in Biopharmaceutical Technologies and Public-Private Partnerships.

Authors:  Rodney J Y Ho
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Kansas Family Physicians Perceptions of Parental Vaccination Hesitancy.

Authors:  Kale Mills; Kari Nilsen
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.