| Literature DB >> 35371290 |
Na Zhang1, Jianping Lin2, Bengang Hui1, Bowei Qiao1, Weibo Yang1, Rongxin Shang1, Xiaoping Wang1, Jie Lei1.
Abstract
Lung nodules are the main lesions of the lung, and conditions of the lung can be directly displayed through CT images. Due to the limited pixel number of lung nodules in the lung, doctors have the risk of missed detection and false detection in the detection process. In order to reduce doctors' work intensity and assist doctors to make accurate diagnosis, a lung nodule segmentation and recognition algorithm is proposed by simulating doctors' diagnosis process with computer intelligent methods. Firstly, the attention mechanism model is established to focus on the region of lung parenchyma. Then, a pyramid network of bidirectional enhancement features is established from multiple body positions to extract lung nodules. Finally, the morphological and imaging features of lung nodules are calculated, and then, the signs of lung nodules can be identified. The experiments show that the algorithm conforms to the doctor's diagnosis process, focuses the region of interest step by step, and achieves good results in lung nodule segmentation and recognition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35371290 PMCID: PMC8967527 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5112867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Algorithm flow chart.
Figure 2U-Net.
Figure 3Internal structure of attention mechanism.
Figure 4Dense atrous convolution block.
Figure 5Sampling structure.
Figure 6Network structure.
Figure 7Database display.
Figure 8Image of different window width and window level.
Comparison of lung parenchyma segmentation performance.
| Algorithm | Md (%) | Vd (%) | Ud (%) | CM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D | 86 | 13 | 14 | 86 |
| Graph cuts | 87 | 12 | 16 | 86 |
| U-Net | 95 | 10 | 13 | 90 |
| Ours | 98 | 8 | 10 | 93 |
Figure 9Effect graphs of lung parenchyma segmentation.
Comparison of segmentation performance of lung nodules.
| Algorithm | Md (%) | Vd (%) | Ud (%) | CM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level sets | 79 | 21 | 20 | 79 |
| Active contour model | 83 | 20 | 18 | 81 |
| Dual-branch residual network | 86 | 17 | 15 | 84 |
| Ours | 91 | 15 | 11 | 88 |
Figure 10Segmentation effect of lung nodules.
Lung nodule recognition rate.
| FPF (%) | Axial | Axial+coronal | Axial+coronal+sagittal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isolated nodules | 89 | 93 | 95 |
| Vascular adhesive nodule | 78 | 85 | 91 |
Figure 11Nodule and vessel images.
Performance comparison of feature recognition algorithms.
| Algorithm | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | FPF (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texture | 79 | 74 | 20 |
| SVM | 81 | 79 | 19 |
| MSCN | 84 | 83 | 18 |
| Ours | 91 | 88 | 15 |
Figure 12ROC.