| Literature DB >> 35371252 |
Qingjiang Li1, Xuejiao Chai2, Chunqing Zhang3, Xinjia Wang4, Wenhui Ma3.
Abstract
Aiming at the problems of low prediction accuracy and low sensitivity of traditional ischemic stroke recurrence prediction methods, which limits its application range, by introducing an adaptive particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm into the Long and Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, a prediction model of ischemic stroke recurrence using deep learning in mobile medical monitoring system is proposed. First, based on the clustering idea, the particles are divided into local optimal particles and ordinary particles according to the characteristic information and distribution of different particles. By updating the particles with different strategies, the diversity of the population is improved and the problem of local optimal solution is eliminated. Then, by introducing the adaptive PSO algorithm into the LSTM, the PSO-LSTM prediction model is constructed. The optimal super parameters of the model are determined quickly and accurately, and the model is trained combined with the patient's clinical data. Finally, by using SMOTE method to process the original data, the imbalance of positive and negative sample data is eliminated. Under the same conditions, the proposed PSO-LSTM prediction model is compared with two traditional LSTM models. The results show that the prediction accuracy of PSO-LSTM model is 92.0%, which is better than two comparison models. The effective prediction of ischemic stroke recurrence is realized.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35371252 PMCID: PMC8970909 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8936103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1The structure of the LSTM ischemic stroke recurrence prediction model based on adaptive PSO.
Figure 2Sample data before and after normalization. (a) Initial source data. (b) Normalized data.
Calculation results of different evaluation indexes before and after processing by SMOTE method.
| Evaluation index | Before SMOTE processing (%) | After SMOTE processing (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy ( | 78.2 | 92.0 |
| Sensitivity ( | 69.3 | 91.2 |
| Specificity ( | 81.1 | 90.5 |
| Positive prediction rate ( | 62.6 | 85.3 |
| Negative prediction rate ( | 86.4 | 83.7 |
| F1_score ( | 65.8 | 88.5 |
Evaluation indexes for prediction results of different methods.
| Evaluation index | Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PSO-LSTM (%) | Reference [ | Reference [ | |
| Accuracy ( | 92.0 | 86.2 | 85.1 |
| Sensitivity ( | 91.2 | 84.4 | 83.5 |
| Specificity ( | 90.5 | 82.2 | 80.1 |
| Positive prediction rate ( | 85.3 | 82.6 | 83.1 |
| Negative prediction rate ( | 83.7 | 80.7 | 80.2 |
| F1_score ( | 88.5 | 82.5 | 81.9 |
Figure 3ROC curve of PSO-LSTM prediction model.