| Literature DB >> 35371154 |
Allali Aimad1, El Abdali Youness2, Rezouki Sanae1, Abdelfattah El Moussaoui2, Mohammed Bourhia3, Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah4, Abdulhakeem Alzahrani4, Heba Khalil Alyahya4, Nawal A Albadr4, Hiba-Allah Nafidi5, Lahcen Ouahmane3, Fadli Mohamed1.
Abstract
Essential oils (EO) of Origanum compactum Benth. (O. compactum) are well known for their biological and pharmacological activities. This study aimed to assess the chemical composition, antifungal, insecticidal and repellent activities of EO of O. compactum used in the Mediterranean diet. Phytochemical screening was conducted using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Antifungal activity was tested by the disc diffusion method followed by a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay against Candida albicans (C. albicans), Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus), Aspergillus niger (A. nige), and Fusarium oxysporum (F. oxysporum). Repellent potential and toxicity of EO by contact and inhalation were tested against Callosobruchus maculatus (C. maculatus). The yield of essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation of O. compactum was 4.41 ± 0.35%, mainly composed of Carvacrol (38%) and Thymol (31.46%). Regarding antifungal activity, the results revealed a wide antifungal spectrum of the studied EO against the tested strains, which reached 100% growth inhibition, especially against A. niger and C. albicans even at the lowest MIC values (3.125 μg/mL). Concerning insecticidal activity, the EO caused total mortality of C. maculatus adults at a dose of 20 μL/L air with LC50 value of 5.3 μL/L air. A significant reduction in the number of eggs and emergence was proportionally recorded with increasing doses up to 100% at 20 μL/L air. For repellent activity, the studied EO showed a moderate repellent activity with an average percentage of 39.16%. The outcome of this work revealed that O. Compactum EO could be a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative bioinsecticide and bio-fungicide to replace the chemically synthesized forms.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal; bioinsecticide; drug resistance; essential oil; insecticidal
Year: 2022 PMID: 35371154 PMCID: PMC8964369 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.798259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Repellent test of Origanum compactum essential oil against C. maculatus.
Phytochemical compounds identified in O. compactum EO.
| Peak | RT | Compound name | RI | Area (%) |
| 1 | 4.542 | Beta-Myrcene | 114 | 0.55 |
| 2 | 4.936 | o-Cymene | 212 | 9.07 |
| 3 | 6.341 | Borneol L | 562 | 0.60 |
| 4 | 5.285 | Gamma-Terpinene | 299 | 11.11 |
| 5 | 5.659 | L-Linalool | 392 | 2.41 |
| 6 | 4.852 | Alpha-terpinene | 191 | 0.84 |
| 7 | 6.430 | 4-Terpineol | 584 | 0.90 |
| 8 | 6.538 | Alpha terpineol | 611 | 0.58 |
| 9 | 7.317 | Thymol | 805 | 31.46 |
| 10 | 9.461 | (-) Caryophylleneoxide | 1,339 | 1.21 |
| 11 | 7.413 | Carvacrol | 829 | 38.73 |
| 12 | 8.361 | Caryophyllene | 1,065 | 1.47 |
| 13 | 6.984 | Pulegone | 722 | 1.07 |
| Monoterpenes | 97.32 | |||
| Sesquiterpenes | 2.68 | |||
| Total | 100 | |||
RT, Retention time; RI, Retention index.
FIGURE 2GC-MS chromatographic profile of O. compactum EO.
FIGURE 3Antifungal activity of O. Compactum EO tested by disc diffusion method against F. oxysporum (A) and A. niger (B). (C,D) Are untreated fungi for F. oxysporum and A. niger, respectively (negative controls).
MIC results of O. compactum Benth. EO against fungal strains.
| Fungal strains | Minimal inhibitory concentration (μg/mL) | |
| Essential oil | Fluconazole | |
|
| 3.125 | 128 |
|
| 6.25 | 256 |
|
| 12.5 | 160 |
|
| 3.125 | 400 |
FIGURE 4Percentage of mortality (means ± SD) of C. maculatus adults exposed to an inhalation test of different doses of O. compactum EO.
FIGURE 5Percentage of mortality (means ± SD) of C. maculatus adults exposed to a contact test with different doses of Origanum compactum EO.
LC50 and LC95 values calculated based on the mortality of C. maculatus adults by the inhalation test after 24 h of exposure to O. compactum EO.
| Bioassays | LC50 | LC95 |
|
|
| 33.61 (24.58;62.83) | 211.23 (10.93;1900.8) | 1.21 |
|
| 5.53 | 75.67 | 17.47 |
X
*Confidence intervals are too wide, they do not lend themselves to calculation.
FIGURE 6Female fecundity and emergence of new individuals (mean values ± SD) after a direct contact test with different doses of EO.
FIGURE 7Fecundity and emergence reduction rates after a direct contact test with different doses of EO.
Results of repellent activity of EO from O. compactum against C. maculatus.
| Doses of EO (μL/cm2) | Probability (P) | Average %PR | Class | ||||
| 0.016 | 0.079 | 0.157 | 0.315 | ||||
| 30 min | 13.33 ± 11.55 | 13.33 ± 11.55 | 40 ± 20 | 46.67 ± 11.55 | 0.03 | 28.33 | Moderatelyrepellent (II) |
| 60 min | 13.33 ± 5.77 | 33.33 ± 11.55 | 53.33 ± 11.55 | 56.67 ± 15.26 | 0.005 | 39.16 | Moderatelyrepellent (II) |
| 120 min | 0 ± 0 | 26.67 ± 11.55 | 46.67 ± 11.55 | 53.33 ± 11.55 | 0.0007 | 31.67 | Moderatelyrepellent (II) |
PR, percentage of repulsion.
Each number is the mean standard error of three replicates. The symbol * indicates that the difference between the values in the same row are significant, whilst the symbol ** means highly significant (p > 0.05) using the LSD test. Repulsion class: Class 0—0–0.1%; Class I—0.1–20%; Class II—20.1–40%; Class III—40.1–60%; Class IV—60.1–80%; Class V—80.1–100%.