| Literature DB >> 35370962 |
Sijie Chen1,2, Kui Tang1,2, Yi Gong3, Fei Ye3, Liyan Liao4, Xiaodu Li1,2, Qi Zhang1,2, Yan Xu1,2, Rongsen Zhang1,2, Chengcheng Niu1,2.
Abstract
Mummified thyroid nodules (MTNs) are rarely reported and are usually misdiagnosed as malignant nodules. This article first reviewed the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enhancement features of 218 MTNs and classified them into three (A, B, C) patterns. The A pattern MTNs show linear hypo-enhancement, the B pattern MTNs show heterogeneous hypo-enhancement, and the C pattern MTNs show no enhancement in thyroid nodules. The A and C pattern enhancements of MTNs demonstrated a high specificity compared with the enhancement of previously reported typical papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs). To further study the B pattern MTNs, 24 B pattern MTNs and 42 PTCs were enrolled in this study, and CEUS parameters for each nodule were evaluated. Univariate analysis indicated that compared with PTCs, the B pattern MTNs more frequently exhibited heterogeneous hypo-enhancement and clear margins after clearance (p <0.05). A multivariate analysis revealed that heterogeneous hypo-enhancement and clear margins after clearance were independent characteristics related to the B pattern MTNs for differentiating them from PTCs (p <0.05). Thus, preoperative CEUS may provide more important information for distinguishing MTNs from malignant thyroid nodules to avoid surgical excisions or unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA).Entities:
Keywords: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); fine-needle aspiration (FNA); mummified thyroid nodules (MTNs); papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs); thyroid ultrasonography
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35370962 PMCID: PMC8971290 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.850698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Diagnostic Performance of the MTNs by the Kwak TI-RADS.
| TI-RADS score | Number of malignant US features | MTNs (n = 218) | Pathologic method | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery (n = 27) | FNA (n = 191) | |||
| 4b | 2 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| 4c | 3–4 | 142 | 22 | 120 |
| 5 | 5 | 48 | 5 | 43 |
Figure 1Diagram shows different CEUS enhancement patterns of mummified thyroid nodules. (A) Early phase of CEUS shows a linear perfusion of microbubbles with a clear margin compared with surrounding enhanced thyroid parenchymal tissue, and the late phase of CEUS shows the microbubbles faded away with a clear margin. (B) Early phase of CEUS shows a heterogeneous hypo-enhancement of microbubbles perfusion with a blurred margin compared with surrounding enhanced thyroid parenchymal tissue, and the late phase of CEUS shows the microbubbles faded away with a clear margin. (C) Both early phase and late phase of CEUS show no microbubbles enter the thyroid nodules, which has a clear margin compared with surrounding enhanced thyroid parenchymal tissue. The green circles indicate the margin of the thyroid nodules, the white arrows indicate the microbubbles perfusion in the thyroid nodules.
Figure 2A 40-year-old woman with A pattern mummified thyroid nodule proven by FNAB. (A) Nodule showed solid component, hypoechogenicity, ill-defined margin and taller than wide shape (TI-RADS 4c). (B) Time-intensity curve showed the CEUS parameters of this nodule compared with peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (C) The early phase of CEUS showed a linear enhancement (white arrows) in the whole nodule (green circle). (D) The late phase of CEUS showed the microbubbles in the nodule fade away with a clear margin compared with peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (E) Parametric color map showed the values of peak for the nodule was totally deep blue compared with the surrounding yellow color of thyroid parenchyma, indicated the peak intensity of the nodule was markedly lower than peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (F) Parametric color map showed that the AUC for the nodule was totally deep blue with a little linear yellow on the peripheral of the nodule, indicated AUC of the nodule was obviously lower than peripheral thyroid parenchyma.
Figure 3A 22-year-old woman with the B pattern mummified thyroid nodule proven by FNAB. (A) Nodule showed solid component, hypoechogenicity, ill-defined margin, taller than wide shape and microcalcification (TI-RADS 5). (B) Time-intensity curve showed the CEUS parameters of this nodule compared with peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (C) The early phase of CEUS showed a heterogeneous hypo-enhancement (white arrows) in the whole nodule (green circle). (D) The late phase of CEUS showed the microbubbles in the nodule fade away with a clear margin compared with peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (E) Parametric color map showed the values of peak for the nodule was uneven deep blue and blue, compared with the surrounding yellow and blue color of thyroid parenchyma, indicated the peak intensity of the nodule was lower than peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (F) Parametric color map showed that the AUC for the nodule was uneven deep blue and yellow color, compared with the surrounding red color of thyroid parenchyma, indicated AUC of the nodule was lower than peripheral thyroid parenchyma.
Figure 4A 58-year-old man with C pattern mummified thyroid nodule proven by FNAB. (A) Nodule showed solid component and hypoechogenicity (TI-RADS 4b). (B) Time-intensity curve showed the CEUS parameters of this nodule compared with peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (C) The early phase and (D) the late phase of CEUS showed no microbubbles enter the nodule (green circle). (E) Parametric color map showed the values of peak for the nodule was completely deep blue, indicated the peak intensity of the nodule was markedly lower than peripheral thyroid parenchyma. (F) Parametric color map showed that the AUC for the nodule was totally deep blue compared with the surrounding red color of thyroid parenchyma, indicated AUC of the nodule was obviously lower than peripheral thyroid parenchyma.
CEUS Characteristics of the B pattern MTNs and PTCs.
| Characteristics | MTNs (n = 24) | PTCs (n = 42) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Size (mm) | 8.46 ± 3.05 | 7.62 ± 3.02 | 0.683 |
| Enhancement type | 0.000* | ||
| Homogeneous hypo-enhancement | 1 (4.2) | 29 (69.0) | |
| Heterogeneous hypo-enhancement | 23 (95.8) | 13 (31.0) | |
| Arrival time | 0.404 | ||
| Early | 1 (4.2) | 5 (11.9) | |
| Late | 23 (95.8) | 37 (88.1) | |
| Margin after clearance | 0.000* | ||
| Clear | 20 (83.3) | 3 (7.1) | |
| Blurred | 4 (16.7) | 39 (92.9) |
*p <0.05 was considered a significant difference.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of CEUS characteristics related to the B pattern MTNs distinguishing from PTCs.
| Characteristics | Partial regressioncoefficient, β | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heterogeneous hypo-enhancement | 2.655 | 14.225 | 1.383–146.265 | 0.026* |
| Clear margin after clearance | 3.264 | 26.167 | 4.771–143.512 | 0.000* |
*p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference.