| Literature DB >> 35370879 |
Yingchi Shan1, Yihua Li1, Xiang Wu1, Jiaqi Liu1, Guoqing Zhang2, Yajun Xue1, Guoyi Gao1.
Abstract
Purpose: Texture analysis based on clinical images had been widely used in neurological diseases. This study aimed to achieve depth information of computed tomography (CT) images by texture analysis and to establish a model for noninvasive evaluation of intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH).Entities:
Keywords: computed tomography; hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage; intracranial hypertension; noninvasive evaluation; texture analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35370879 PMCID: PMC8966839 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.832234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Selection of six rectangular ROI with size of 20 pixels × 20 pixels. The red, green, and blue rectangles, respectively, represent ROI of the anterior horn, the temporal lobe, and the posterior horn.
Figure 2Model establishment and analysis process. MF, morphological features; AH, anterior horn; TL, temporal lobe; PH, posterior horn.
Initial ICP and morphological features of patients.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 146 (135–157) |
| GCS score | 6 (4–7) |
| Initial ICP (mmHg) | 25 (15–30) |
| >20 mmHg | 32 (68.09%) |
| Location of hemorrage | |
| | 5 (10.64%) |
| | 35 (74.47%) |
| | 7 (14.89%) |
| With subarachnoid hemorrhage | 6 (12.77%) |
| Hematoma volume (ml) | 52.40 (37.25–78.94) |
| Midline shift (mm) | 6.61 (3.95–9.21) |
| Ventriculocranial ratio | 0.24 (0.16–0.30) |
Selected features and their variation rate.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Anterior horn (12 features) | |
| Autocorrelation | 0.09 (0.05~0.16) |
| Cluster shade | 0.71 (0.46~1.66) |
| Idm | 0.05 (0.03~0.07) |
| Joint average | 0.05 (0.02~0.09) |
| Joint energy | 0.27 (0.16~0.40) |
| Maximum probability | 0.16 (0.10~0.24) |
| Sum average | 0.05 (0.02~0.09) |
| Gray level variance | 0.47 (0.24~0.75) |
| High gray level run emphasis | 0.59 (0.32~0.79) |
| Run length nonuniformity | 0.22 (0.10~0.34) |
| Short run emphasis | 0.20 (0.09~0.45) |
| Short run low gray level emphasis | 0.25 (0.13~0.39) |
| Temporal lobe (10 features) | |
| Cluster prominence | 0.65 (0.32~0.91) |
| Id | 0.05 (0.02~0.08) |
| Idm | 0.05 (0.02~0.08) |
| Joint average | 0.06 (0.03~0.12) |
| Maximum probability | 0.11 (0.06~0.23) |
| Gray level nonuniformity | 0.12 (0.05~0.23) |
| High gray level run emphasis | 0.22 (0.13~0.38) |
| Long run high gray level emphasis | 0.49 (0.22~0.85) |
| Run length nonuniformity | 0.26 (0.14~0.52) |
| Run percentage | 0.22 (0.09~0.40) |
|
| |
| Cluster prominence | 0.40 (0.23~0.88) |
| Cluster shade | 0.82 (0.34~2.37) |
| Correlation | 0.92 (0.57~1.75) |
| Imc1 | 0.45 (0.25~0.79) |
| Imc2 | 0.32 (0.14~0.56) |
| MCC | 0.42 (0.15~0.60) |
| Sum squares | 0.33 (0.13~0.73) |
| Long run emphasis | 0.26 (0.16~0.45) |
| Run entropy | 0.15 (0.09~0.23) |
| Run length nonuniformity normalized | 0.34 (0.18~0.55) |
| Run percentage | 0.12 (0.07~0.23) |
| Short run low gray level emphasis | 0.17 (0.07~0.26) |
Performance of models based on textural features and morphological features.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 66.67% | 73.33% | 80.00% | 60.00% |
| Precision | 59.62% | 85.71% | 88.46% | 32.14% |
| Recall | 55.00% | 60.00% | 70.00% | 45.00% |
| F1 score | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.38 |
| AUC | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 0.42 |
Figure 3Performance of models based on textural features (anterior horn, temporal lobe, and posterior horn) and morphological features in discriminating intracranial hypertension; the AUCs for these models were 0.70, 0.70, 0.90, and 0.42, respectively.