| Literature DB >> 35370854 |
Yun-Lin Tsai1, Yen-Wenn Liu2, Peng-Nien Wang1, Chun-Yuan Lin1, Tsuo-Hung Lan1.
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a common health problem among patients with schizophrenia, but the precise mechanisms are not fully understood. There has been much interest in the relationship between gut microbiome and development of obesity. Gender-dependent microbial alteration has been reported in previous studies. However, the gender factor in gut microbiome composition of schizophrenia patients has been less investigated. Our study aimed to identify differences in gut microbiota between schizophrenia patients with normal weight and central obesity and investigate the gender specific features. Method: Twenty participants (10 males, 10 females) with central obesity (CO) and 20 participants (10 males, 10 females) with normal weight (NW) were recruited from two rehabilitation wards in a psychiatric hospital in central Taiwan. Fecal samples from 40 participants were processed for microbiota analysis. The intestinal microbiota composition was analyzed using next-generation sequencing and QIIME software.Entities:
Keywords: central obesity; gender difference; gut dysbiosis; microbiome; schizophrenia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35370854 PMCID: PMC8965277 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.836896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Demographic and clinical characteristics of studied patients.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Age (years) | 50.1 | 7.5 | 46.8 | 11.9 | 0.23 | 52.2 | 7.5 | 50.6 | 6.0 | 0.30 | 51.2 | 7.4 | 48.7 | 9.4 | 0.18 | |||||||||||||||
| CPZ equivalent (mg/d) | 508.8 | 143.2 | 575.5 | 138.7 | 0.15 | 472.8 | 245.1 | 578.8 | 302.6 | 0.31 | 490.8 | 245.1 | 577.1 | 229.1 | 0.26 | |||||||||||||||
| PANSS total score | 86.5 | 8.7 | 86.1 | 6.3 | 0.45 | 86.9 | 6.7 | 87.1 | 5.7 | 0.47 | 86.7 | 6.7 | 86.6 | 5.9 | 0.48 | |||||||||||||||
| BMI | 26.7 | 2.2 | 19.9 | 1.7 | <0.001 | 26.2 | 2.0 | 20.0 | 1.9 | <0.001 | 26.4 | 2.0 | 20.0 | 1.8 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
| Waist circumference (cm) | 96.9 | 4.2 | 78.7 | 5.8 | <0.001 | 96.1 | 7.3 | 74.7 | 6.8 | <0.001 | 96.5 | 7.3 | 76.7 | 6.5 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
| WHR | 0.89 | 0.05 | 0.81 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.89 | 0.05 | 0.84 | 0.08 | 0.058 | 0.89 | 0.05 | 0.83 | 0.06 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
| PBF (%) | 26.0 | 6.0 | 15.5 | 6.1 | <0.001 | 34.2 | 3.6 | 24.5 | 8.4 | <0.01 | 30.0 | 6.4 | 20.0 | 8.5 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
| SBP (mmHg) | 119.2 | 13.4 | 106.1 | 10.9 | <0.05 | 111.6 | 11.2 | 104.9 | 7.0 | 0.06 | 115.4 | 11.2 | 105.5 | 8.9 | <0.01 | |||||||||||||||
| DBP (mmHg) | 83.5 | 9.3 | 72.6 | 8.9 | <0.01 | 68.8 | 9.6 | 69.5 | 5.9 | 0.42 | 76.2 | 9.7 | 71.0 | 7.6 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
| AC sugar (mg/dl) | 96.5 | 14.4 | 97.2 | 15.1 | 0.45 | 99.6 | 12.6 | 92.7 | 7.5 | 0.07 | 98.1 | 12.6 | 95.0 | 11.8 | 0.22 | |||||||||||||||
| HbA1c (%) | 5.4 | 0.6 | 5.5 | 0.3 | 0.38 | 5.6 | 0.5 | 5.37 | 0.3 | 0.11 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 5.4 | 0.3 | 0.29 | |||||||||||||||
| Total cholesterol | 159.2 | 28.0 | 161.2 | 28.8 | 0.44 | 182.3 | 40.0 | 192.1 | 40.8 | 0.30 | 170.8 | 40.0 | 176.7 | 37.8 | 0.31 | |||||||||||||||
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 35.3 | 4.9 | 46.3 | 8.6 | <0.01 | 42.0 | 9.4 | 54.4 | 18.0 | <0.05 | 38.6 | 9.4 | 50.4 | 14.4 | <0.01 | |||||||||||||||
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 98.5 | 26.6 | 92.7 | 23.9 | 0.31 | 114.5 | 37.2 | 108.2 | 32.0 | 0.35 | 106.5 | 37.2 | 1,005 | 28.7 | 0.27 | |||||||||||||||
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 146.9 | 56.5 | 77.2 | 17.9 | <0.001 | 142.7 | 49.1 | 98.4 | 42.6 | <0.05 | 144.8 | 49.1 | 87.8 | 33.6 | <0.001 | |||||||||||||||
CPZ, Chlorpromazine; PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist hip ratio; PBF, percentage of body fat; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; AC, ante cibum; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.
Figure 1Alpha and beta diversity were compared between subjects with central obesity (CO) and normal weight (NW). Bacterial community richness was defined by the observed number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and alpha diversity was calculated using the Shannon index, Simpson index, and inverse Simpson index for both phylum (A) and class levels (B). The analysis of beta diversity was calculated using PCoA of Bray-Curtis distances (C).
Figure 2Relative abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of the gut microbiota of central obese (CO) and normal weight (NW) subjects at (A) phylum and (B) genus levels.
Figure 3Relative abundances were compared between male and female subjects with central obesity (CO) and normal weight (NW). The relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia at phylum (A), genus of (B) Akkermansia, (C) Prevotella, (D) Roseburia, and (E) Phascolarctobacterium were compared. Female CO subjects had significantly lower abundance of Verrucomicrobia at the phylum level. At the genus level, relative abundance of Akkermansia was decreased in female CO subjects compared with female NW subjects, while Prevotella and Roseburia were increased in female CO subjects. Phascolarctobacterium was enriched in male CO subjects compared with male NW subjects.