| Literature DB >> 35370819 |
Momtaz Abdel-Wahab1, Tarek Okasha2, Mostafa Shaheen3, Mohamed Nasr3, Tarek Molokheya4, Abd ElNasser Omar5, Menan A Rabie5, Victor Samy6, Hany Hamed7, Mohamed Ali8.
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a public health burden that creates a strain not only on individuals, but also on the economy. Treatment-resistant depression in the course of major depressive disorder represents a clinically challenging condition that is defined as insufficient response to two or more antidepressant trails with antidepressants of the same or different classes that were administered at adequate daily doses for at least 4 weeks. Objective/Hypothesis: To develop a treatment guideline for Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD). Methodology: Experts in the field gathered and reviewed the available evidence about the subject. Then, a series of meetings were held to create recommendations that can be utilized by Egyptian psychiatrists.Entities:
Keywords: clinical psychiatry; depression; guidelines; neuropharmacology; treatment resistance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35370819 PMCID: PMC8964405 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.797150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1The available therapeutic options for TRD.
Figure 2Schematic diagrams of switching strategies. (A) Concurrent switch is best suited for patients demonstrating partial response, where simultaneous change in the dose of both medications is implemented. (B) Overlapping switch is suitable for patients who demonstrate partial response, where the dose of the original medication is maintained until the second medication reaches its optimal dose. (C) Sequential switch is considered to be the safest switching technique, as it is the least likely to cause any interaction. In this strategy, one medication is substituted with another. This technique is used in patients who do not respond to initial treatment.
Figure 3Recommendations for switching antidepressant medications. If patient is responsive continue on current treatment, if not consider combination strategies** Adapted from the French guidelines. **Combination strategy = The panel recommends the use of combination strategy in patients with partial response after adequate treatment with a medication for a period of 2–4 weeks.
Therapeutic lines in augmentation strategy in non-psychotic patients.
|
|
|---|
|
|
| • Lithium with serum level must be at least 0.8 mmol/L |
| • Second generation anti-psychotic with antidepressant action (Quetiapine, Asenapine, Iloperidone, Brexpiprazole, Laurasidone, Cariprazine) |
|
|
| • Aripiprazole |
| •Tri-iodothyronine |
| • Lamotrigine |
Treatment lines recommendations for clinical dimensions in MDD.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| With marked anhedonia | NDRI or SNRI |
| With marked psychomotor retardation | SNRI or NDRI |
| With marked sleep disturbances | SSRI or SNRI or Mirtazapine or agomelatine |
| With atypical features (hyperphagia, hypersomnia) | SSRI or SNRI |
| With psychotic features | SNRI in monotherapy or SSRI in combination with an atypical 2nd generation antipsychotic with an antidepressant action |
| With anxious features | SSRI or SNRI or Mirtazapine or Lithium |
| With high suicidal risk | SSRI or SNRI or Mirtazapine or Lithium or 2nd generation antipsychotic with an antidepressant action |
| Positive family history of bipolar disorder or suicide | Mood stabilizer (Lithium) |
The main findings of this study.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization: indications | The panel members recommended the consideration of psychiatric hospitalization for the following cases. | |
| Therapeutic options for treatment | For patients suffering from comorbid conditions, the expert panel recommends the following: | |
| Treatment duration | The clinical committee members recommended that patients are maintained on their ongoing antidepressant medication for a period of 9–12 months following the achievement of clinical remission. | |
| Therapeutic options of patients suffering from TRD | The panel experts highlighted the available treatment options for patients suffering from TRD. The available therapeutic options are captured in | |
|
| ||
| Switching strategies | The panel experts recommend switching to be carried out in the following situations: | |
| Recommendations for switching antidepressant medications are captured in | ||
| **Combination strategies | The panel recommends the use of combination strategy in patients with partial response after adequate treatment with a medication for a period of 2–4 weeks (4–6 weeks with TCAs). | |
| Augmentation strategies | The panel recommends this strategy in patients who demonstrate partial response after 2–4 weeks of treatment (4–6 weeks if on TCAs). The panel recommends adding lithium or quetiapine to improve efficacy of the antidepressant medication. | |
| Treatment sequence for depression dimensions | The panel recommendations for the first and second lines of treatment of several depression dimensions are illustrated in | |
| Brain stimulation techniques (BST) | The panel selected ECT/BST, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as the preferred brain stimulation techniques that are either used alone or in combination with antidepressants. | |
| Novel therapeutic agents | Esketamine, in combination with SSRIs or SNRIs, is indicated for the treatment of TRD in patients who did not respond to least 2 different classes of antidepressant medications ( | |
| Strategies to prevent relapse | It is of importance to have measures to prevent relapse from the first relapse episode. With regard to preventive strategies, the following has been highlighted: | |
| The panel recommends the use of ECT and lithium as effective first-line options to prevent relapse. | ||