| Literature DB >> 35370376 |
Upadhyay Atul1, Bansal Charu2, Shukla Umesh3.
Abstract
Background: Decreased ability to fall asleep and/or stay asleep with daytime effects of sleep deprivation is identified as primary insomnia. Elderly due to the predominant Vata Dosha in the body are easily affected by this problem. Brimhana Nasya (nourishing nasal drop) with Ksheera Bala Taila and oral administration of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal) root powder both are indicated in Ayurvedic classics for the management of insomnia. Aim: To determine the combined efficacy of oral administration of Ashwagandha root powder along with Brimhana Nasya with Ksheera Bala Taila in primary insomnia in geriatric. Materials and methods: This was randomized, open-label clinical study conducted at the hospital of Pt. Khushilal Sharma Government Ayurveda College and Institute Bhopal. Randomly selected 60 elderly patients with primary insomnia were randomly divided into two groups (30 in each group). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was used to assess the symptoms of primary insomnia. Relief in the subjective symptoms was assessed in percentage. Then, the statistical significance of result within the group was assessed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test and the comparative effect of therapy in both groups was assessed using Mann-Whitney test. Graph Pad InStat-3 software was used for statistical analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Ashwagandha powder; Brimhana Nasya; Ksheera Bala Taila; Withania somnifera; geriatric insomnia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35370376 PMCID: PMC8966760 DOI: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_177_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ayu ISSN: 0974-8520
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram
Result of observation of baseline data (n=60) primary insomnia geriatric patients
| Total observation of ( | Observation |
|---|---|
| Total 68.34% ( | Elderly between the age group of 60-65 elderly were suffering from primary insomnia |
| Total 70% ( | Had reported poor sleep hygiene |
| Total 56.67% ( | Patients were taking mixed diet |
| Total 56.66% ( | Were insufficiently active |
| Total 80% ( | Patients addicted with tea/coffee |
| Total 30% ( | Patients addicted with tobacco chewing |
| Total 26.66% ( | Patients addicted with smoking |
| Total 75% ( | Patients belonged to |
| Total 56.67% ( | Patients were doing daytime napping |
| Total 70% ( | Patients were experiencing stress |
| Total 65% ( | Patients were experiencing anger |
| Total 38.33% ( | Patients were experiencing unknown fear |
Effect of therapy on the basis of PSQI score in the groups
| PSQI | Group | Mean | MD | % Relief | SD | SE | Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test and | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| BT | AT | |||||||
| Comp: 1 Subjective | A ( | 2.143 | 0.2857 | 1.857 | 86.66 | 0.5909 | 0.1117 | W=406, |
| B ( | 2.000 | 1.259 | 0.7407 | 37.05 | 0.5257 | 0.1012 | W=190 | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=79, | ||||||||
| Comp: 2 Sleep Latency | A ( | 2.679 | 1.071 | 1.607 | 60.02 | 0.7860 | 0.1485 | W=351, |
| B ( | 2.852 | 2.074 | 0.7778 | 27.27 | 0.6405 | 0.1233 | W=171 | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=169.50, | ||||||||
| Comp: 3 Sleep Duration | A ( | 2.964 | 0.3214 | 2.643 | 89.15 | 0.6785 | 0.1282 | W=406, |
| B ( | 2.963 | 2.407 | 0.5556 | 18.76 | 0.7511 | 0.1445 | W=66, | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=30.500, | ||||||||
| Comp: 4 Habitual Sleep Efficiency | A ( | 2.536 | 0.2500 | 2.286 | 90.14 | 0.8100 | 0.1531 | W=378, |
| B ( | 2.778 | 1.704 | 1.074 | 38.66 | 0.8738 | 0.1682 | W=190 | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=126.50, | ||||||||
| Comp: 5 Sleep Disturbances | A ( | 1.964 | 1.071 | 0.8929 | 45.62 | 0.4163 | 0.07867 | W=300 |
| B ( | 1.926 | 1.148 | 0.7778 | 40.39 | 0.4237 | 0.08153 | W=231, | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=337.50, | ||||||||
| Comp: 6 Use of Sleeping Medication | A ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| B ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=0 | ||||||||
| Comp: 7 Daytime Dysfunction | A ( | 2.036 | 0.3571 | 1.679 | 82.46 | 0.7228 | 0.1366 | W=406, |
| B ( | 1.407 | 1.037 | 0.3704 | 26.29 | 0.5649 | 0.1087 | W=45, | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=70.500, | ||||||||
| PSQI Global Score | A ( | 14.321 | 3.357 | 10.964 | 77.64 | 2.134 | 0.4033 | W=406, |
| B ( | 13.926 | 9.519 | 4.407 | 33.33 | 2.735 | 0.5264 | W=378 | |
| Mann- Witney U-statistic=24.500, | ||||||||
PSQI: Pittsburgh sleep quality index, BT: Before treatment, AT: After treatment, MD: Mean difference, SD: Standard deviation, SE: Standard error, W: Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test, N: Number of patients, ES: Extremely significance, VS: Very significance
Overall Effect of therapy on Global Score of PSQI in Group A and Group B
| Global Score | No. of patients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||
|
|
| |||
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1-6 | 0 (0%) | 17 (60.71%) | 0 (%) | 4 (14.81%) |
| 7-12 | 3 (10.72%) | 8 (28.57%) | 3 (11.11%) | 8 (29.63%) |
| 13-18 | 25 (89.28%) | 3 (10.72%) | 24 (88.89%) | 15 (55.55%) |