INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and decompensated right heart failure (DRHF) have worse outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). We reviewed the role of central veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a bridge to recovery after PEA in these patients. METHODS: Of 388 consecutive patients undergoing PEA, 40 (10.3%) were admitted with DRHF before PEA. This group was compared to the remaining 348 patients undergoing PEA (elective group). We also compared 2 periods: 2005-2013 (n = 120) and 2014-2019 (n = 268) after which early central VA-ECMO was introduced as a strategy to manage difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). RESULTS: The proportion of patients with DRHF remained similar between the first and second period (13% vs 9%, p = .2). The number of VA-ECMO bridge to recovery increased from 0.8% in 2005-2013 to 6.3% in 2014-2019 (p = .02). In the second period, 29% of DRHF patients were transitioned intraoperatively from CPB to central VA-ECMO for a median duration of 3 (2-7) days. After the introduction of central VA-ECMO as a bridge to recovery, the hospital mortality in patients with DRHF dropped from 31% in 2005-2013 to 4% in 2014-2019 (p = .03). In the long-term, the functional recovery and survival after discharged from hospital was similar between the DRHF group and the elective group. However, at 5 years, DRHF patients more frequently required PH targeted medical therapy (45% vs 20% in the elective group, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Central VA-ECMO as a bridge to recovery is an important treatment strategy that can decrease hospital mortality in patients with DRHF and lead to excellent long-term outcome.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and decompensated right heart failure (DRHF) have worse outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). We reviewed the role of central veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a bridge to recovery after PEA in these patients. METHODS: Of 388 consecutive patients undergoing PEA, 40 (10.3%) were admitted with DRHF before PEA. This group was compared to the remaining 348 patients undergoing PEA (elective group). We also compared 2 periods: 2005-2013 (n = 120) and 2014-2019 (n = 268) after which early central VA-ECMO was introduced as a strategy to manage difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). RESULTS: The proportion of patients with DRHF remained similar between the first and second period (13% vs 9%, p = .2). The number of VA-ECMO bridge to recovery increased from 0.8% in 2005-2013 to 6.3% in 2014-2019 (p = .02). In the second period, 29% of DRHF patients were transitioned intraoperatively from CPB to central VA-ECMO for a median duration of 3 (2-7) days. After the introduction of central VA-ECMO as a bridge to recovery, the hospital mortality in patients with DRHF dropped from 31% in 2005-2013 to 4% in 2014-2019 (p = .03). In the long-term, the functional recovery and survival after discharged from hospital was similar between the DRHF group and the elective group. However, at 5 years, DRHF patients more frequently required PH targeted medical therapy (45% vs 20% in the elective group, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Central VA-ECMO as a bridge to recovery is an important treatment strategy that can decrease hospital mortality in patients with DRHF and lead to excellent long-term outcome.
Authors: Marc de Perrot; Karen McRae; Laura Donahoe; Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold; John Thenganatt; John Granton Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2022-03