Measurements of optical activity can be readily performed in transparent matter by means of a rotation of transmitted light polarization. In the case of opaque bulk materials, such measurements cannot be performed, making it difficult to assess possible chiral properties. In this work, we present full angular polarization dependencies of the Raman modes of bulk 1T-TaS2, which has recently been suggested to have chiral properties after pulsed laser excitation. We found that a mechanical rotation of the sample does not alter polarization-resolved Raman spectra, which can only be explained by introducing an antisymmetric Raman tensor, frequently used to describe Raman optical activity (ROA). Raman spectra obtained under circularly polarized excitation demonstrate that 1T-TaS2 indeed shows ROA, providing strong evidence that 1T-TaS2 is chiral under the used conditions of laser excitation. Our results suggest that ROA may be used as a universal tool to study chiral properties of quantum materials.
Measurements of optical activity can be readily performed in transparent matter by means of a rotation of transmitted light polarization. In the case of opaque bulk materials, such measurements cannot be performed, making it difficult to assess possible chiral properties. In this work, we present full angular polarization dependencies of the Raman modes of bulk 1T-TaS2, which has recently been suggested to have chiral properties after pulsed laser excitation. We found that a mechanical rotation of the sample does not alter polarization-resolved Raman spectra, which can only be explained by introducing an antisymmetric Raman tensor, frequently used to describe Raman optical activity (ROA). Raman spectra obtained under circularly polarized excitation demonstrate that 1T-TaS2 indeed shows ROA, providing strong evidence that 1T-TaS2 is chiral under the used conditions of laser excitation. Our results suggest that ROA may be used as a universal tool to study chiral properties of quantum materials.
Since the first observation
of optical activity of quartz by Arago
in 1811,[1] the measurement of rotation of
polarization of transmitted light is one of the fundamental methods
to study the chirality of materials. Such measurements can be readily
performed in the case of transparent materials but cannot be applied
to bulk metals because no light is transmitted. This fact makes it
difficult to optically assess the chiral properties of complex systems
like the charge density wave (CDW) compounds 1T-TaS2 or
1T-TiSe2.[2] In this work, we
provide evidence for the optical activity of 1T-TaS2 by
using polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy.1T-TaS2 undergoes temperature-dependent phase transitions
accompanied by periodic lattice distortions related to charge density
waves.[3−5] It adopts the following four CDW phases: an undistorted
(metallic), incommensurate CDW (ICCDW), nearly commensurate CDW (NCCDW),
and completely commensurate CDW (CCDW). The electronic and surface
structure of 1T-TaS2 in different phases has been extensively
studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and scanning
tunneling microscopy (STM) techniques.[6−9]Despite these phase transitions, 1T-TaS2 can persist
in mixed-metastable states[10,11] or can be used as reversible
memristor material.[12,13] An intriguing property of 1T-TaS2 is the presence of a hidden state, which can be enabled by
an ultrafast light pulse[14,15] and which can also
influence the CDW stacking in the out-of-plane direction.[16] A recent work shows that changes in the CDW
stacking can even be caused by incoherent white light illumination.[17] These findings highlight that light illumination
can directly influence the CDW properties of 1T-TaS2, and
currently it is not established how results obtained by optical spectroscopy
are affected by these effects. Our research demonstrates that Raman
scattering in bulk 1T-TaS2 is a complex phenomenon, which
must be analyzed in terms of the influence of light illumination,
resonant effects, and optical activity.
Experiment
Bulk
1T-TaS2 (hqGraphene) crystals were examined by
means of Raman spectroscopy using a Horiba T64000 spectrometer. Low-temperature
measurements (5 K) were performed using a liquid helium flow cryostat
(Oxford Instrument Hires2). Lasers with wavelengths of 442, 532, 633,
and 785 nm were used as an excitation source. The laser beam was focused
by a 50× objective to an ∼1 μm spot size, and the
power of ∼300 μW was chosen to avoid heating effects
and damage of the sample.For linear polarization-resolved Raman
experiments, incident light
polarization was fixed. A half-wave plate was mounted in front of
the CCD camera, followed by a linear polarizer, which was set parallel
to the incident light polarization axis (see Supporting Information). In order to collect spectra dependent on the
sample rotation, a half-wave plate was mounted above the cryostat,
providing conditions corresponding to a sample rotation experiment
(see Supporting Information).Circularly
polarized incident light was obtained by placing a quarter-wave
plate behind the first polarizer, allowing for excitation by right-
(σ+) or left-handed (σ−) polarized light. A second
quarter-wave plate was placed in front of the second polarizer before
the CCD camera (see Supporting Information). This setup allowed for collecting Raman spectra in four different
configurations of excitation/detection: σ+/σ+, σ+/σ–,
σ–/σ+ and σ–/σ–.
Results
Unpolarized Raman scattering spectra of bulk 1T-TaS2 measured with different excitation wavelength (442, 532, 633, and
785 nm) are shown in Figure . All spectra were measured at 5 K, that is, in the CCDW phase.
Under 532 nm laser excitation, 20 Raman modes with energies close
to 72, 74, 81, 89, 100, 114, 128, 134, 228, 243, 248, 256, 265, 277,
283, 292, 298, 307, 322, and 331 cm–1 were detected.
It is commonly accepted that the observed phonon bands originate from
folding of the Brillouin zone as 1T-TaS2 undergoes CCDW
phase transition.[18−20] As can be seen, for different excitation energies,
some lines do not significantly change their intensities (228 cm–1), however, most of them show observable differences.
A notable example is the line at 114 cm–1 that is
completely attenuated for 633 nm excitation. The doublet with lines
at 243 and 248 cm–1 changes its intensity ratio.
Under higher (lower) excitation energy the 243 cm–1 (248 cm–1) line is more pronounced. The lines
at 256 and 298 cm–1 are most intense under 532 nm
excitation, whereas the 292 cm–1 line is more pronounced
for lower energy excitation (633 and 785 nm wavelengths). The lines
at 256, 283, and 307 cm–1 are very weak when excited
with a 785 nm wavelength laser. Table contains the intensity percentage of Raman modes,
which is defined as the percentage of intensity of each line to the
integrated intensity of all bands in the spectral range of 200–340
cm–1, excited with 442, 532, 633, and 785 nm wavelength
lasers.
Figure 1
Unpolarized Raman scattering spectra of bulk 1T-TaS2 excited
with 532 nm (green line) and 633 nm (red line) laser line.
The Ag or Eg symmetry is assigned to each mode,
based on polarization-resolved measurements (see Figures and 3). The 114 cm–1 line, which is completely attenuated
when excited with 633 nm wavelength laser, is marked with a gray oval.
The inset shows spectra excited with different lasers: 442, 532, 633,
and 785 nm wavelength. Orange and gray shadows mark modes with low
(<0.5) and high (>0.5) polarization degree, respectively (under
532 nm wavelength excitation). All spectra were measured at 5 K.
Table 1
1T-TaS2 Raman Modes Intensity
Percentage for Spectra in the 200–340 cm–1 Energy Range Excited with 442, 532, 633, and 785 nm Wavelength Lasers
intensity percentage (%)
Raman
mode energy (cm–1)
442 nm exc.
532 nm exc.
633 nm exc.
785 nm exc.
228
9.4
5.7
8.9
15.4
243
19.6
18.2
11.3
11.1
248
6.2
8.9
9.8
22.9
256
1.4
8.6
1.3
1.6
265
11.5
3.5
5.3
10.3
271
5.1
0.7
1.7
2.7
277
2.3
3.2
2.8
1.5
283
10.1
7.0
9.6
7.9
292
4.7
3.1
13.9
4.9
299
7.0
11.0
6.7
4.7
307
20.7
14.9
15.5
6.2
322
<0.1
8.0
8.9
6.2
330
2.0
7.2
4.2
4.6
Unpolarized Raman scattering spectra of bulk 1T-TaS2 excited
with 532 nm (green line) and 633 nm (red line) laser line.
The Ag or Eg symmetry is assigned to each mode,
based on polarization-resolved measurements (see Figures and 3). The 114 cm–1 line, which is completely attenuated
when excited with 633 nm wavelength laser, is marked with a gray oval.
The inset shows spectra excited with different lasers: 442, 532, 633,
and 785 nm wavelength. Orange and gray shadows mark modes with low
(<0.5) and high (>0.5) polarization degree, respectively (under
532 nm wavelength excitation). All spectra were measured at 5 K.
Figure 2
(a) Scattered light polarization
rotation dependent and (b) sample
rotation dependent Raman spectra of bulk 1T-TaS2. All spectra
were measured at 5 K, excited with a 633 nm laser line. Only lower
energy modes are shown for clarity. Insets show schematic drawings
of experimental setups used to obtain the Raman spectra.
Figure 3
Angular
intensity plots for each Raman mode measured in scattered
light polarization rotation configuration with fitted function: I = A + B cos2(θ – θmax). Dark green circles refer
to spectra excited with a 532 nm laser line. Bright green circles
were measured with with 532 nm excitation but the sample was mechanically
rotated by 35°. Red circles denote spectra measured under 633
nm excitation. Red and black frames mark modes more intense under
σ+/σ– and σ–/σ+ configuration,
respectively (see Figure ).
Changes in Raman mode intensities under different
excitation energies
shown in Figure can
be explained in terms of resonant Raman scattering, which was reported
for other TMDC materials.[21,22] When the excitation
energy is tuned to a maximum in the material’s joint density
of states, a resonant Raman term must be taken into account, resulting
in an enhancement or attenuation of a particular mode. For a better
understanding of resonant effects, one must refer to the full quantum
Raman scattering model,[21,23,24] where the Raman scattering intensity depends on the excitation energy.1T-TaS2 in the CCDW phase has a large number of bands
in the Brillouin zone for the energy range covered by the excitation
energies applied in our experiments (1.6–2.8 eV).[7,25,26] These energies are well above
the reported values for band gaps of about 100–400 meV.[7,27,28] By increasing the energy of the
excitation laser, one covers many subsequent energy states, which
are located close to each other. This results in the observed effects,
that is, attenuation, enhancement, increase or decrease, of the Raman
intensity of particular modes, as reported for other TMDCs.[21,22] Additionally by selecting energy states with different symmetries,
the polarization properties of Raman modes can also be altered, which
will be discussed later.In order to further study resonant
effects and the symmetry of
Raman modes we performed polarized Raman measurements both in scattered
light polarization rotation and in sample rotation configuration.
The obtained Raman spectra are shown in Figure . As can be seen,
the spectra measured as a function of the scattered light polarization
show large differences (Figure a). All Raman modes are linearly polarized and show a maximum
in intensity for different polarization angles. Raman scattering spectra
measured in sample rotation configuration are shown in Figure b. Unexpectedly, they are entirely
insusceptible to the rotation of the sample.(a) Scattered light polarization
rotation dependent and (b) sample
rotation dependent Raman spectra of bulk 1T-TaS2. All spectra
were measured at 5 K, excited with a 633 nm laser line. Only lower
energy modes are shown for clarity. Insets show schematic drawings
of experimental setups used to obtain the Raman spectra.Angular intensity plots obtained as a function of the scattered
light polarization angle (with fixed incident light polarization)
using different excitation sources (532 and 633 nm wavelength lasers)
are shown in Figure (T = 5 K). Green (red) circles show data obtained
for 532 nm (633 nm) wavelength excitation. The angle θmax for which the plot is the most intense was obtained by fitting the
function: I = A + B cos2(θ – θmax), shown as
green and red solid lines in Figure . On the basis of measurement statistics, we obtained
a 5° uncertainty for the extracted θmax. There
are lines that preserve the main axis of polarization of the laser
(0°) and lines with the main axis rotated by ∼60°,
∼120° or ∼90°. Almost all lines polarized
in 0° direction are fully polarized, whereas the polarization
degree of lines showing other polarization angles differs from ∼0.5
to ∼0.7. Interestingly, the 248 cm–1 line
is fully polarized when excited with green light, but weakly polarized,
when excited with red light. Similarly, the 243 and 292 cm–1 lines are less polarized when excited with a 633 nm wavelength laser.
Moreover, the polarization angles θmax depend strongly
on the excitation energy for a number of lines (134, 277, 283, and
292 cm–1). For both 134 and 277 cm–1 lines, the main axis changes significantly (by about 40°).Angular
intensity plots for each Raman mode measured in scattered
light polarization rotation configuration with fitted function: I = A + B cos2(θ – θmax). Dark green circles refer
to spectra excited with a 532 nm laser line. Bright green circles
were measured with with 532 nm excitation but the sample was mechanically
rotated by 35°. Red circles denote spectra measured under 633
nm excitation. Red and black frames mark modes more intense under
σ+/σ– and σ–/σ+ configuration,
respectively (see Figure ).
Figure 4
Raman scattering spectra of bulk 1T-TaS2 obtained
in
circularly polarized light in σ+/σ– and σ–/σ+
configurations, where σ+ (σ−) means right-handed
(left-handed) circularly polarized light, measured at 5 K. The insets
show angular plots of linear polarization of three lines, 100, 114,
and 265 cm–1, taken from Figure for comparison.
These results most probably stem
from resonant effects. By changing
the excitation energy, we can select states with different symmetries
and therefore create resonant conditions with different symmetries,
as shown in refs (22, 23, and 29). As a result, the polarization properties
of Raman modes can be altered, which explains the observed main axis
rotations. Resonant effects also most probably explain why the observed
Raman lines are not fully polarized. When we excite 1T-TaS2 in the visible range, we resonantly excite many different electronic
states at the same time. These states may have different symmetry
properties and, consequently, angular plots consist of a mixture of
different polarization directions, which results in a lower polarization
degree. However, strongly polarized lines generally do not change
their main axis angle, especially lines polarized in 0° direction
(see Supporting Information).According
to ref (19), bulk 1T-TaS2 in the CCDW phase belongs to the C3 symmetry point group and
has two types of Raman active modes: Eg and Ag. On the basis of the semiclassical model, the Raman mode intensity I can be written as[30]where ei and es stand for incident
and scattered light electric
field unit vectors, respectively, and R is Raman
tensor for a given mode. Superscript t of es denotes the transformation from a column vector to a row vector.
Applying appropriate Raman tensors and electric field unit vectors
allows us to model the Raman intensity dependency on the scattered
light polarization rotation and sample rotation (see Supporting Information). According to this theory, all lines
should be linearly polarized. In the case of scattered light polarization
rotation, Ag modes should preserve incident light polarization
regardless of the sample rotation, whereas the main axis of the Eg modes should depend strongly on the crystal alignment with
respect to the incident light polarization. This means that Ag modes should be polarized along 0° and should be attenuated
in cross-polarization configuration, while Eg modes should
be detectable both in co- and cross-polarization configuration. Assuming
a C3 crystal point group,
we assigned Ag and Eg symmetry to all detected
Raman modes, as shown in Figure . The assignment of the symmetry of Ag and
Eg modes agrees well with available literature,[19,31] where co- and cross-polarization experiments were presented.For the sample rotation experiment, the intensity of Ag modes should be constant, while the angular plots of the Eg modes should show a four-lobbed shape. Surprisingly, angular plots
obtained by mechanically rotating the sample in the cryostat by 35°
are almost unaltered for both, Ag and Eg modes,
as shown in Figure (compare light and dark green dots). This rotation, moreover, led
to a shift of the laser position on the sample, which did not affect
the polarization properties, indicating the macroscopic nature of
the effect. These observations cannot be explained in terms of the
discussed above semiclassical approach. This unexpected result was
also confirmed by rotating the linear polarization of the excitation
laser on the sample. As shown in Figure b, all Raman modes are insusceptible to the
sample rotation in respect to the incident light polarization. Interestingly,
this insusceptibility to the sample rotation resembles results shown
in ref (32) by Huang
et al., where the angular polarization plot of the Raman mode of the
two-dimensional magnet CrI3 A1g is always rotated
by the same angle with respect to the excitation laser polarization.
This polarization rotation can be inverted by switching the ferromagnetic
state. This behavior has not been observed in case of Raman scattering
from other TMDCs in which polarization properties were analyzed based
on Raman tensors and group theory.[22,23,29] Importantly, assuming point group D3 instead of C3, as suggested in ref (31), also does not explain
the insusceptibility of Raman modes to the sample rotation. We propose
that 1T-TaS2 phase is optically active in the CCDW phase
in agreement with a recent work showing intertwined chiral charge
orders in 1T-TaS2 in the hidden, light-induced state.[33]Figure shows Raman spectra of bulk
1T-TaS2 measured
in circularly polarized light in σ+/σ– and σ–/σ+
(excitation/detection) configurations, where σ+ (σ−)
means right-handed (left-handed) circularly polarized light (for other
configurations, see Supporting Information). As can be seen, the intensity of some lines show considerable
differences, which is the signature of Raman optical activity.[34] The lines at 74, 100, 134, 243, 248, and 298
cm–1 are more intense in σ+/σ–
configuration, while the lines at 265 and 283 cm–1 are more pronounced in σ–/σ+ configuration. When
we compare this data to the linear polarization angular plots (see Figure , green dots), we
observe that all modes more intense in the σ+/σ–
configuration are lines with their main axis rotated by 60–80°
(modes rotated right). The only two modes with a main polarization
axis of 120–150° (rotated left) are the 265 and 284 cm–1 lines, which clearly are more intense in σ–/σ+
configuration. Some lines remain almost unchanged in circularly polarized
light. These lines are modes with a main axis of 0° or very weak
modes (89, 277, and 292 cm–1) with a main axis close
to 90°, which can be easily influenced by more intense neighboring
lines, and it is not clear whether their angular plot is rotated to
the left or right.Raman scattering spectra of bulk 1T-TaS2 obtained
in
circularly polarized light in σ+/σ– and σ–/σ+
configurations, where σ+ (σ−) means right-handed
(left-handed) circularly polarized light, measured at 5 K. The insets
show angular plots of linear polarization of three lines, 100, 114,
and 265 cm–1, taken from Figure for comparison.
Discussion
The observed polarization rotations are well reproduced with an
antisymmetric Raman tensor in the formwhere we omit the components related to third
direction, which is not studied in our experiments. The observed polarization
rotations cannot be explained in terms of chiral phonons[35,36] found in semiconducting TMDCs (like MoS2) because they
require the inversion symmetry to be broken, which is not the case.Antisymmetric Raman tensors were experimentally observed by Koningstein,[37] for yttrium aluminum garnet and introduced in eq to describe Raman lines
of a single crystal of PrCl3[38] and by Barron[34,39] to explain ROA for molecular
light scattering. For the Raman tensor in eq , the Raman mode intensity according to eq can be written aswherewhich means that the scattered light is linearly
polarized and the polarization angle is equal to θ = −θ′
and does not depend on the sample orientation. Such effects are induced
by a broken mirror symmetry, which can be caused for example by the
Jahn–Teller effect.[40] It is worth
noticing that the antisymmetric Raman effects induced by “chirality
density” were also observed by Raman scattering for the heavy
Fermion superconductor URu2Si2.[41] In contrast to 1T-TiSe2, chirality has not been
observed for pristine 1T-TaS2.[42,43] However, recent reports show that chiral CDWs can be induced in
1T-TaS2 by Ti doping[43] and in
the case of the light-induced hidden state.[33] Our results showing an insusceptibility of the polarization properties
upon sample rotation and the observed Raman optical activity indicate
that the studied sample is chiral. In accordance with recent results
showing that the CDW stacking in 1T-TaS2 can be influenced
even by low-power incoherent white light illumination,[17] we believe that in fact with Raman spectroscopy
we do not probe a pure CCDW state, but a light-induced “hidden”
state. As shown by Gerasimenko et al.[33] intertwined chiral charge orders can arise in this state, which
may give rise to the observed optical activity. Another explanation
involves the experimental backscattering configuration. Because of
this configuration, only phonons with specific momentum direction
are prefered and detected. Our room-temperature polarization-resolved
measurements (see Supporting Information) show that Raman modes visible in the NCCDW phase can be linearly
polarized with the polarization direction neither parallel nor perpendicular
to the incident light polarization direction. This behavior implies
that the observed optical activity is related to the superlattice
formation and that some signs of it can be detected in the NCCDW phase.A question that remains to be answered is why we observe three
types of Raman modes? One type has a main axis of 0° and two
more types are rotated left and right, respectively. One possible
explanation may be given by the superlattice reconstruction. For the
undistorted lattice there is one Γ point of the first Brilloiun
zone with an effective wavevector keff = k0 ± G = 0,
where G is a reciprocal lattice vector. However,
due to the Brillouin zone reduction in the CCDW phase, we obtain two
additional families of Γ points: the second group includes k0′ = {g1, g2, −g1, −g2, g2 – g1, g1 – g2} and the third group includes k0″ = {g1 + g2, 2g1 – g2, g1 – 2g2,
– g1 – g2, g2 – 2g1, 2g2 – g1}. A corresponding schematic drawing is presented in Figure . Therefore, there
are three types of Brillouin zone Γ points in the CCDW state,
which can be responsible for the three types of linear polarization
directions of Raman modes.
Figure 5
1T-TaS2 Brillouin zone reconstruction
in the CCDW phase
showing three families of points with keff = 0 (green, brown, and blue circles). The red hexagon shows the
Brillouin zone before the metal–insulator phase transition
(in undistorted phase).
1T-TaS2 Brillouin zone reconstruction
in the CCDW phase
showing three families of points with keff = 0 (green, brown, and blue circles). The red hexagon shows the
Brillouin zone before the metal–insulator phase transition
(in undistorted phase).
Conclusion
We
show that polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy allows one
to study complex phenomena, especially in the case of opaque bulk
materials. Polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy measurements of
bulk 1T-TaS2 showed that the angles of the main axis of
linearly polarized Raman modes cannot be explained in terms of semiclassical
models. We propose that they can be understood in terms of optical
activity. Our results obtained with circularly polarized light indeed
show the expected Raman optical activity, which requires 1T-TaS2 in the CCDW phase to be chiral. The observed chirality can
be explained based on recent findings showing that a chiral CDW order
may be present in the light-induced state of 1T-TaS2. This
explanation suggests that care must be taken when using laser-based
methods to study CDW compounds, since light illumination may have
an impact on the final properties. The polarization-resolved results
are repeatable and do not depend on the position of the excitation
spot on the sample, which proves that the observed effects are macroscopic
crystal properties and cannot be attributed to local microscopic defects.
Our results show that full polarization-resolved Raman spectroscopy,
in contrast to the commonly performed cross/co linear polarization
measurements, is a simple yet very powerful technique that allows
studying the chirality of complex opaque materials on a macroscopic
scale.