| Literature DB >> 35369429 |
Wenchao Yu1,2, Yisha Lu1,2, Yawei Shen1,2, Junyu Liu1,2, Shihai Gong1,2, Feng Yu1,2, Zekun Huang1,2, Weiguang Zou1,2, Mingcan Zhou1,2, Xuan Luo1,2, Weiwei You1,2, Caihuan Ke1,2.
Abstract
Feed efficiency (FE) is critical to the economic and environmental benefits of aquaculture. Both the intestines and intestinal microbiota play a key role in energy acquisition and influence FE. In the current research, intestinal microbiota, metabolome, and key digestive enzyme activities were compared between abalones with high [Residual feed intake (RFI) = -0.029] and low FE (RFI = 0.022). The FE of group A were significantly higher than these of group B. There were significant differences in intestinal microbiota structures between high- and low-FE groups, while higher microbiota diversity was observed in the high-FE group. Differences in FE were also strongly correlated to variations in intestinal digestive enzyme activity that may be caused by Pseudoalteromonas and Cobetia. In addition, Saprospira, Rhodanobacteraceae, Llumatobacteraceae, and Gaiellales may potentially be utilized as biomarkers to distinguish high- from low-FE abalones. Significantly different microorganisms (uncultured beta proteobacterium, BD1_7_clade, and Lautropia) were found to be highly correlated to significantly different metabolites [DL-methionine sulfoxide Arg-Gln, L-pyroglutamic acid, dopamine, tyramine, phosphatidyl cholines (PC) (16:0/16:0), and indoleacetic acid] in the high- and low-FE groups, and intestinal trypsin activity also significantly differed between the two groups. We propose that interactions occur among intestinal microbiota, intestinal metabolites, and enzyme activity, which improve abalone FE by enhancing amino acid metabolism, immune response, and signal transduction pathways. The present study not only elucidates mechanisms of variations in abalone FE, but it also provides important basic knowledge for improving abalone FE by modulating intestinal microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: Haliotis discus hannai; enzyme activity; feed efficiency; intestinal microbiota; metagenome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35369429 PMCID: PMC8969561 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.852460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Phenotype statistics of two groups of abalone after a 72-day culture experiment.
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |||||
| Mean | Max | Min | Mean | Max | Min | |
| FER | 0.427a | 0.610 | 0.157 | 0.296ab | 0.424 | 0.020 |
| RFI (g/day) | −0.029a | −0.026 | −0.378 | 0.022b | 0.032 | −0.005 |
| ADG (g/day) | 0.200a | 0.255 | 0.071 | 0.143ab | 0.212 | 0.011 |
| DFI (g/day) | 0.467a | 0.490 | 0.443 | 0.488ab | 0.530 | 0.474 |
RFI, residual feed intake; FER, feed efficiency ratio; ADG, average daily gain; DFI, daily feed intake; A group, group with low RFI; B group, group with high RFI; a,b, lowercase letters in the same row indicate differences between the two groups (P < 0.05).
α-Diversity indexes of the two study groups.
| Groups | Coverage | Shannon | Simpson | Ace | Chao1 | PD whole tree |
| A | 0.998 | 4.1 | 0.84 | 603.9 | 604.3 | 101.2 |
| B | 0.998 | 3.97 | 0.86 | 517.7 | 517.9 | 54.0 |
FIGURE 1(A) Relative abundance of bacteria phyla from the group A and group B. a: Others, b: Deinococcus-Thermus, c: Patescibacteria, d: Epsilonbacteraeota, e: Spirochaetes, f: Actinobacteria, g: Cyanobacteria, h: Firmicutes, i: Bacteroidetes, j: Tenericutes, and k: Proteobacteria. (B) Relative abundance of bacteria genus from different groups. a: Others, b: Formosa, c: Caulobacter, d: Ruegeria, e: Halocynthiibacter, f: Tamlana, g: Pseudoalteromonas, h: Cobetia, i: uncultured, j: Aquabacterium, and k: Mycoplasma.
FIGURE 2(A) Cladogram showing significant overrepresentation of microbial populations and taxa as assessed by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (P ≤ 0.05 and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) cutoff >3.0). (B) Microbial functional predictions revealed the most differentially regulated metabolic pathways in the fecal microbiome at KEGG level. (C) Microbial functional predictions revealed the most differentially regulated metabolic pathways in the fecal microbiome at the clusters of orthologous groups (COG) level.
FIGURE 3Hierarchical clustering analysis of the differential metabolites in the high- and low-residual feed intake (RFI) groups in the positive ion mode. Red and blue respectively represent upregulated and downregulated differential metabolites (DEs).
FIGURE 4Upregulated and downregulated metabolic pathways in abalone from groups A and B.
FIGURE 5Heat map of the Spearman correlation coefficient matrix for significantly different intestinal microbiota and significantly different metabolites. All intestinal microbiota and metabolites shown in Figure were significantly different between the two groups. The blue dashed line in the middle is the dividing line, and the correlation coefficient matrix heat map can be divided into four quadrants, with the upper left corner showing correlations between different intestinal microbiota, the lower right corner showing correlations between significantly different metabolites, and both the upper right and lower left corners showing correlations of significantly different intestinal microbiota and significantly different metabolites, with mirror symmetry.
FIGURE 6Key digestive enzyme activity and protease activity in the intestines of the high- and low-residual feed intake (RFI) groups. “*” represents a significant difference (P < 0.05).