| Literature DB >> 35369278 |
Sabrina Reppuccia1, Felice Crocetto1, Elisabetta Gragnano1, Pietro D'Alessandro1, Martin Vetrella1, Gabriele Saccone1, Bruno Arduino1.
Abstract
Aim: To assess the efficacy of vitamin E oral spray in pregnancy. Materials & methods: This was a retrospective study aimed to evaluate efficacy of vitamin E oral spray (vitamin E acetate in a medium chain tryglicerides vehicle - patented formulation) starting from the first trimester of pregnancy, with a control group.Entities:
Keywords: NICU; periodontal disease; pre-eclampsia; preterm birth; supplements; vitamin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35369278 PMCID: PMC8965794 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2021-0095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Future Sci OA ISSN: 2056-5623
Available maternal characteristics of the included women.
| Oral spray (n = 100) | Control (n = 100) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 28.5 ± 6.1 | 29.9 ± 6.4 |
| Prior preterm birth | 59 (59%) | 51 (51%) |
| Prior cervical surgery | 7 (7%) | 11 (11%) |
| TVU CL ≤25 mm | 44 (44%) | 53 (53%) |
| BMI >30 | 17 (17%) | 21 (21%) |
Data are shown as number (percentage) or as mean ± standard deviation.
TVU CL: Transvaginal ultrasound cervical length.
Primary and secondary outcomes.
| Oral spray (n = 100) | Control (n = 100) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preterm birth at less than 37 weeks | 15 (15%) | 27 (27%) |
|
| Pre-eclampsia | 5 (5%) | 6 (6%) | NS |
| Perinatal death | 0 | 0 | - |
| Birth weight, g (mean ± SD) | 3,105 ± 748 | 2,945 ± 860 | Mean difference 160 g (-63.39 to 383.39) |
| Admission to NICU | 6 (6%) | 8 (8%) | NS |
Data are shown as number (percentage) or as mean ± standard deviation.
Boldface data is statistically significant.
NICU: Neonatal intensive care unit; NS: Non significant; SD: Standard deviation.