| Literature DB >> 35369041 |
Bambang Irawan1, Inten Wahyuningtias1, Niken Ayuningtyas1, Ola Apriyani Isky1, Salman Farisi1, Sumardi Sumardi1, Afandi Afandi2, Sutopo Hadi3.
Abstract
Pineapple plantations leave a lot of plant biomass after the planting season ends. The abundant residue of pineapple plants causes problems due to the high content of lignocellulose, which is difficult to decompose naturally. This study aimed to isolate and characterize lignocellulolytic microfungi isolates from pineapple plantations. The information of this study was used as data to prepare an inoculum for the induction of pineapple litter composting that was resistant to stress to pineapple plantation habitat. The results showed that there were 11 dominant lignocellulolytic microfungi isolates found from pineapple litter and plantation soil. Using selective media, the selection showed five cellulolytic (Bioggp 3, 6, 9, 11, and 12); five xylanolytic (Bioggp 3, 6, 8, 9, and 12); and two ligninolytic microfungi isolates (Bioggp 2 and 5). Bioggp 3, 6, 9, and 12 are cellulolytic and xylanolytic with Bioggp 3 showing the highest cellulolytic index (4.0) and xylanolytic index (4.20). Testing of ligninolytic microfungi showed that the Bioggp 5 isolate had a stronger lignin indicator (color intensity = 4.0 and zone ratio of 1.47) than the Bioggp 2 isolate. Bioggp 9 had the highest cellulolytic isolate spore productivity at 4.5 × 108 spores/mL with 93.3% spore viability, and Bioggp 3 had the highest xylanolytic isolate spore productivity at 2.5 × 109 spores/mL with 89.3% spore viability. Bioggp 2 had the highest ligninolytic isolate spore productivity at 1.8 × 109 spores/mL, but Bioggp 5 showed the highest spore viability at 98.0%.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35369041 PMCID: PMC8970963 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9252901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Figure 1Moist chamber method.
Isolation and enzymatic selection of fungi isolates from pineapple plantations.
| No | Isolates | Cellulolytic | Xylanolytic | Ligninolytic | Genus |
|
| |||||
| 1 | Bioggp 2 | − | − | + |
|
| 2 | Bioggp 3 | ++ | ++ | − |
|
| 3 | Bioggp 4 | − | − | − | — |
| 4 | Bioggp 5 | − | − | + |
|
| 5 | Bioggp 6 | + | + | − |
|
| 6 | Bioggp 7 | − | − | − | — |
| 7 | Bioggp 8 | − | + | − |
|
| 8 | Bioggp 9 | + | + | − |
|
| 9 | Bioggp 10 | − | − | − | — |
| 10 | Bioggp 11 | + | − | − | Unidentified |
| 11 | Bioggp 12 | + | + | − |
|
Note: + = enzymatic activity; − = no enzymatic activity.
Cellulolytic index, spore numbers, and viability of isolates.
| Isolates | Cellulolytic index | Spore numbers (spores/mL) | Spore viability (CFU/mL) | Percentage of spore viability (%) |
|
| ||||
| Bioggp 3 | 4.00 ± 0.783b | 2.0 × 108 | 4.7 × 107 | 91.5 |
| Bioggp 6 | 1.26 ± 0.109a | 1.5 × 108 | 6.0 × 107 | 95.1 |
| Bioggp 9 | 1.17 ± 0.041a | 4.5 × 108 | 1.2 × 108 | 93.3 |
| Bioggp 11 | 1.09 ± 0.011a | 1.7 × 108 | 4.5 × 106 | 80.8 |
| Bioggp 12 | 1.52 ± 0.309a | 2.7 × 108 | 4.4 × 106 | 78.7 |
Note: the data followed by the same letter indicates no significant differences.
Xylanolitic index, spore numbers, and viability of isolates.
| Isolates | Xylanolitic index | Spore numbers (spores/mL) | Spore viability (CFU/mL) | Percentage of spore viability (%) |
|
| ||||
| Bioggp 3 | 4.20 ± 1.03a | 2.5 × 109 | 2.6 × 108 | 89.3 |
| Bioggp 6 | 1.90 ± 0.42b | 2.5 × 108 | 1.0 × 107 | 83.3 |
| Bioggp 8 | 1.20 ± 0.17b | 1.8 × 107 | 8.5 × 105 | 80.8 |
| Bioggp 9 | 1.50 ± 0.12b | 4.6 × 109 | 2.6 × 108 | 86.6 |
| Bioggp 12 | 1.20 ± 0.07b | 2.2 × 109 | 2.2 × 106 | 67.7 |
Note: the data followed by the same letter indicates no significant differences.
Ligninolytic index, spore numbers, and viability of isolates.
| Isolates | Ligninolytic index | Intensity | Spore numbers (spores/mL) | Spore viability (CFU/mL) | Percentage of spore viability (%) |
|
| |||||
| Bioggp 2 | 1.25 ± 0.06 | 3 | 1.8 × 109 | 6.0 × 108 | 95.0 |
| Bioggp 5 | 1.47 ± 0.22 | 4 | 8.3 × 108 | 5.2 × 108 | 98.0 |
Remarks of scale of intensity: 4 = dark brown; 3 = brown; 2 = light brown; 1 = pale brown; and 0 = no color.
The effect of pH, temperature, and herbicides on the growth of cellulolytic fungi.
| Isolate | pH | Temperature (°C) | Herbicides (1%) | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 30 | 35 | 37 | Ametryne | Diuron | |
|
| ||||||||
| Bioggp 3 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Bioggp 6 | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + |
| Bioggp 9 | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| Bioggp 11 | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| Bioggp 12 | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
Note: +: grow; −: not grow.
The effect of pH, temperature and herbicides on the growth of xylanolytic fungi.
| Isolate | pH | Temperature (°C) | Herbicides (1%) | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 30 | 35 | 37 | Ametryne | Diuron | |
|
| ||||||||
| Bioggp 3 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Bioggp 6 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Bioggp 8 | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| Bioggp 9 | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| Bioggp 12 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Note: +: grow; −: not grow.
The effect of pH, temperature, and herbicides on the growth of ligninolytic fungi.
| Isolate | pH | Temperature (°C) | Herbicides (1%) | ||||||||
| Fungi growth | Color zone | ||||||||||
| (intensity) | |||||||||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 30 | 35 | 37 | Ametryne | Diuron | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Bioggp 2 | + | + | + | 1 | 2 | 3 | + | − | − | − | + |
| Bioggp 5 | + | + | + | 2 | 3 | 4 | + | − | − | − | + |
Remarks of scale of intensity: 4 = dark brown; 3 = brown; 2 = light brown; 1 = pale brown; and 0 = no color.
Figure 2(a) Clear zone of cellulolytic (Bioggp 3); (b) xylanolytic (Bioggp 3) isolate; (c) oxidation of guaiacol of ligninolytic (Bioggp 2); and (d) (Bioggp 5) isolate on specific media.