| Literature DB >> 35368923 |
Dongliang Chen1, Li Fan1, Yifei Rui1, Zining Yan1.
Abstract
In order to study the value of left atrial volume three-dimensional echocardiography in predicting cardiotoxicity in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy, a total of 53 patients with multiple myeloma who are treated in the Department of Hematology of our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 are selected as the research object, and all patients underwent three cycles (T1-T3) of chemotherapy. Before and after each cycle of chemotherapy, the patients are examined with 3D ultrasound and serology detection. These patients are divided into the cardiotoxicity group and noncardiotoxicity group. The serological indexes and three-dimensional echocardiographic parameters between two groups are compared. Multivariate logistic regression is used to determine the independent risk factors of cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing chemotherapy. And ROC curves are performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of related indicators in predicting cardiotoxicity. A total of 53 patients with multiple myeloma are included in this study. Serological indexes (T3 cTnI and T3 Pro-BNP), T2 LAVmin, T3 LAVmin, T2 LAVprep, and T3 LAVprep in the cardiotoxicity group are significantly higher than those in the noncardiotoxicity group. Multivariate logistic regression further found that T3 cTnI, T3 Pro-BNP, T2 LAVmin, T3 LAVmin, T2 LAVprep, T3 LAVprep could be used to predict the occurrence of cardiotoxicity (P < 0.05). The results of ROC curves showed that T3 LAVmin had the most diagnostic efficiency of cardiotoxicity (AUC = 0.938; sensitivity 75.72%; specificity 93.82%). Detection of changes in left atrial volume using three-dimensional ultrasound could be used as strong predictors of cardiotoxicity caused by anthracycline chemotherapy drugs in patients with multiple myeloma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35368923 PMCID: PMC8970808 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2590847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Comparison of basic information between two groups.
| Parameters | Cardiotoxicity group ( | Noncardiotoxicity group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female ( | 3/7 | 9/34 | 0.381 | 0.537 |
| Age (years) | 46.84 ± 5.72 | 47.13 ± 6.24 | 0.134 | 0.894 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.04 ± 3.52 | 25.84 ± 3.47 | 0164 | 0.871 |
| Thyroid disease ( | 1 (10.00%) | 3 (6.98%) | 0.106 | 0.7444 |
| Lung disease ( | 1 (10.00%) | 4 (9.30%) | 0.005 | 0.946 |
| Cardiovascular risk factors ( | ||||
| Smoking | 1 (10.00%) | 5 (11.63%) | 0.021 | 0.884 |
| Hypertension | 2 (20.00%) | 9 (20.93%) | 0.004 | 0.948 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 2 (20.00%) | 11 (25.58%) | 0.137 | 0.712 |
| Diabetes | 3 (30.00%) | 14 (32.56%) | 0.024 | 0.876 |
Comparison of serological indicators at different time points between two groups.
| Index | Group | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cTnI (ng/mL) | Cardiotoxicity ( | 0.023 ± 0.011 | 0.025 ± 0.013 | 0.026 ± 0.019 | 0.039 ± 0.015 | 5.208 | 0.006 |
| Noncardiotoxicity ( | 0.020 ± 0.015 | 0.023 ± 0.018 | 0.024 ± 0.015 | 0.024 ± 0.013 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Pro-BNP (pg/mL) | Cardiotoxicity ( | 94.44 ± 19.39 | 95.92 ± 19.73 | 100.93 ± 21.49 | 122.38 ± 20.38 | 5.583 | 0.003 |
| Noncardiotoxicity ( | 81.29 ± 28.94 | 83.39 ± 31.29 | 91.92 ± 29.30 | 95.63 ± 28.39 | |||
Note: compared with noncardiotoxicity group, P < 0.05.
Table of echocardiographic parameters at different time points in patients with and without cardiotoxicity.
| Index | Group | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAVmin (mL) | Cardiotoxicity ( | 16.83 ± 2.07 | 17.93 ± 2.51 | 20.62 ± 1.47 | 22.94 ± 1.91 | 5.201 | 0.007 |
| Noncardiotoxicity ( | 16.13 ± 3.92 | 16.63 ± 3.29 | 18.39 ± 1.84 | 19.84 ± 2.72 | |||
|
| |||||||
| LAVmax (mL) | Cardiotoxicity ( | 38.82 ± 4.96 | 39.11 ± 5.23 | 40.28 ± 5.28 | 42.82 ± 6.02 | 4.713 | 0.011 |
| Noncardiotoxicity ( | 36.18 ± 5.29 | 38.72 ± 6.28 | 39.13 ± 5.65 | 40.89 ± 5.39 | |||
|
| |||||||
| LAVprep (mL) | Cardiotoxicity ( | 25.92 ± 5.29 | 26.29 ± 4.68 | 28.83 ± 3.17 | 29.99 ± 5.53 | 2.934 | 0.049 |
| Noncardiotoxicity ( | 24.88 ± 4.02 | 25.18 ± 3.79 | 26.69 ± 4.03 | 26.11 ± 4.18 | |||
|
| |||||||
| LAEF (%) | Cardiotoxicity ( | 54.65 ± 8.34 | 53.52 ± 7.75 | 52.42 ± 8.25 | 51.54 ± 8.27 | 1.243 | 0.295 |
| Noncardiotoxicity ( | 55.65 ± 9.43 | 54.54 ± 8.43 | 54.14 ± 9.65 | 53.83 ± 8.42 | |||
Note: compared with noncardiotoxicity group, P < 0.05.
Figure 1Imagine analysis of left atrium in patients.
The results of multivariate logistic regression analyses.
| Parameters |
| Se | Wald |
| OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 cTnI | 0.732 | 0.316 | 3.064 | 0.025 | 2.081 | 0.968–2.274 |
| T3 Pro-BNP | 0.172 | 0.025 | 6.005 | 0.016 | 1.187 | 1.139–1.237 |
| T2 LAVmin | 0.387 | 0.024 | 9.042 | 0.003 | 1.472 | 1.413–1.534 |
| T3 LAVmin | 0.468 | 0.183 | 9.505 | 0.001 | 1.595 | 1.116–2.279 |
| T2 LAVprep | 0.292 | 0.018 | 8.874 | 0.005 | 1.336 | 1.292–1.381 |
| T3 LAVprep | 0.397 | 0.014 | 9.784 | 0.000 | 1.411 | 1.376–1.447 |
The results of ROC curves analyses.
| Parameters | AUC | 95%CI | Cut-off | Sensibility (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 cTnI | 0.751 | 0.718–0.876 | 0.024 | 92.86 | 56.99 |
| T3 Pro-BNP | 0.852 | 0.704–0866 | 100.60 | 100.00 | 53.76 |
| T2 LAVmin | 0.892 | 0.721–0.878 | 20.10 | 82.83 | 66.97 |
| T3 LAVmin | 0.938 | 0.886–0.981 | 21.20 | 75.72 | 93.82 |
| T2 LAVprep | 0.762 | 0.660–0.831 | 30.10 | 51.72 | 95.72 |
| T3 LAVprep | 0.823 | 0.826–0.949 | 24.40 | 95.20 | 66.67 |
Figure 2Results of ROC curves analyses.