| Literature DB >> 35368922 |
Juan Xu1, Lingling Wang2, Hongxia Sun3, Shanshan Liu4.
Abstract
Plaque is a bacterial biofilm that adheres to each other and exists on the tooth surface, and new plaque can continuously reform after removing it from the tooth surface. The pathogenesis of periodontal disease is related to the bacteria, the host and the environment, with the bacteria and bacterial products in plaque being the main initiators of periodontal disease. The effective control of plaque is an effective method for the treatment and prevention of periodontal disease and is often underappreciated in clinical practice. For the traditional diagnostic method through experience and visual observation, it may lead to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. In order to accurately diagnose plaque disease, this study designed a convolutional neural network-based oral dental disease diagnosis system for oral care interventions to improve oral health awareness. Thus motivate patients to implement proper oral health care measures, and continuously and lifelong insist on thorough daily plaque removal to improve patients' physical health and quality of life in periodontal disease patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35368922 PMCID: PMC8967516 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6505672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Dental plaque in Google global hot trend.
Figure 2Main characteristics and visualization of dental plaque.
Figure 3Convolutional neural network structure.
Figure 4Model structure.
Figure 5Intelligent diagnostic architecture.
Recognition rate of training sample set and test sample set.
| Number of training | 1200 (%) | 1400 (%) | 1600 (%) | 1 800 | 2 000 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training samples | 83.67 | 84.32 | 85.71 | 85.94% | 86.21 |
| Test samples | 64.73 | 66.28 | 68.49 | 70.11% | 71.95 |
Comparison of recognition performance of fully connected neural networks and GoogLeNet.
| Type | Fully connected (%) | GoogLeNet |
|---|---|---|
| Recognition rate | 60.36 | 71.95% |
Comparison of plaque control effect before and after intervention in 2 groups (x ± s).
| Time | Group | Gingival index | Gingival bleeding index | Periodontal pocket probing depth (mm) | Plaque index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preintervention | Observation group ( | 2.15 ± 0.33 | 3.67 ± 0.35 | 3.17 ± 2.08 | 2.59 ± 0.96 |
| Control group ( | 2.12 ± 0.37 | 3.59 ± 0.32 | 3.14 ± 2.10 | 2.60 ± 0.93 | |
| Postintervention | Observation group ( | 1.02 ± 0.65 | 0.46 ± 0.20 | 2.09 ± 2.35 | 0.98 ± 0.77 |
| Control group ( | 1.57 ± 0.59 | 0.67 ± 0.25 | 2.76 ± 2.42 | 1.49 ± 0.85 |