| Literature DB >> 35368754 |
Kefu Sha1, Yue Zhao1, Deng Yang1, Zhaoxia Song1, Mingjun Zhao1, Jieqing Gao1, Tiejun Liu1.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the application effect of bladder function training combined with Kangaiping pills on permanent bladder stoma after radical prostatectomy (RP).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35368754 PMCID: PMC8970873 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6211543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of clinical data (n = 40).
| Items | EG | CG |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average age (mean ± SD, years) | 65.83 ± 3.46 | 65.79 ± 3.52 | 0.051 | 0.959 |
| BMI (mean ± SD, kg/m2) | 21.72 ± 1.35 | 21.76 ± 1.42 | 0.129 | 0.898 |
| Hypertension | 0.202 | 0.653 | ||
| Yes | 17 (42.50%) | 19 (47.50%) | ||
| No | 23 (57.50%) | 21 (52.50%) | ||
| Diabetes | 0.219 | 0.640 | ||
| Yes | 11 (27.50%) | 13 (32.50%) | ||
| No | 29 (72.50%) | 27 (67.50%) | ||
| Family income | 0.205 | 0.651 | ||
| ≥3000 yuan/(month/person) | 16 (40.00%) | 18 (45.00%) | ||
| <3000 yuan/(month/person) | 24 (60.00%) | 22 (55.00%) | ||
| Residence ( | 0.453 | 0.501 | ||
| Urban area | 17 (42.50%) | 20 (50.00%) | ||
| Rural area | 23 (57.50%) | 20 (50.00%) | ||
| Education ( | ||||
| College degree or above | 2 (5.00%) | 3 (7.50%) | 0.213 | 0.644 |
| Senior high school | 6 (15.00%) | 4 (10.00%) | 0.457 | 0.499 |
| Junior high and below | 32 (80.00%) | 33 (82.00%) | 0.082 | 0.775 |
Comparison of changes in bladder function classification (n (%)).
| Group |
| Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | Grade IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG | 40 | 27 (67.50) | 11 (27.50) | 2 (5.00) | 0 (0.00) |
| CG | 40 | 18 (45.00) | 13 (32.50) | 6 (15.00) | 3 (7.50) |
|
| 4.114 | 0.219 | 2.222 | 3.117 | |
|
| <0.05 | 0.640 | 0.136 | 0.077 |
Comparison of urodynamic indexes after intervention (mean ± SD, kPa).
| Group |
| LPP | MUCP |
|---|---|---|---|
| EG | 40 | 11.82 ± 1.35 | 37.64 ± 3.27 |
| CG | 40 | 9.26 ± 1.17 | 29.29 ± 3.31 |
|
| 9.063 | 11.350 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Comparison of LUTS scores between the two groups after intervention (mean ± SD). Note. The abscissa represented EG and CG, and the ordinate represented the LUTS score (points). The average LUTS scores of EG and CG after intervention were (15.23 ± 2.63) and (19.85 ± 2.59), respectively. represents a notable difference in the average LUTS scores after intervention between the two groups (t = 7.916, P < 0.001).
Figure 2Comparison of SF-36 scores between the two groups after intervention (mean ± SD). Note. The abscissa represented EG and CG, and the ordinate represented the SF-36 score (points). The SF-36 scores of EG and CG after intervention were (76.60 ± 4.44) and (69.00 ± 4.21), respectively. represents a notable difference in the SF-36 scores after intervention between the two groups (t = 7.856, P < 0.001).
Comparison of occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions (n (%)).
| Group |
| Urinary tract obstruction | Cystospasm | Skin infection around the stoma | Total incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG | 40 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.50) | 2.50% (1/40) |
| CG | 40 | 2 (5.00) | 1 (2.50) | 3 (7.50) | 15.00 (6/40) |
|
| 3.914 | ||||
|
| <0.05 |