| Literature DB >> 35366946 |
Hiroaki Arima1, Sweta Koirala2, Kotaro Nema1,3, Masayuki Nakano4, Hiromu Ito1, Kapil Madi Poudel5, Kishor Pandey6, Basu Dev Pandey7, Taro Yamamoto8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Tsarang (at 3560 m), which is located in Mustang, 62.7% of the residents answered that they had a subjective medical history of arthritis, and 41.1% of the residents answered that their families had a subjective medical history of arthritis on a survey conducted in 2017. The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) and its effects are deeply involved in hypoxic adaptation in Tibetan highlanders. At the same time, HIF is also related to the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Therefore, the adaptive mechanism acquired by Tibetan highlanders may promote the development of rheumatoid arthritis. The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis is estimated to be approximately 0.5-1.0% worldwide. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Tsarang residents using existing diagnostic criteria and to explore its risk factors.Entities:
Keywords: Mustang; Rheumatoid arthritis; Tibetan highlander
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35366946 PMCID: PMC8976395 DOI: 10.1186/s40101-022-00283-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Physiol Anthropol ISSN: 1880-6791 Impact factor: 2.867
Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of participants
| Variables | Male ( | Female ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||
| Age (mean ± SD) | 53.5 ± 11.3 | 51.2 ± 11.8 | 0.3981 | ||
| Education | |||||
| No formal schooling | 16 | 59.3 | 43 | 86.0 | 0.0507 |
| Less than primary school | 6 | 22.2 | 3 | 6.0 | |
| Less than secondary school | 4 | 14.8 | 2 | 4.0 | |
| Higher education | 1 | 3.7 | 2 | 4.0 | |
| Occupation | |||||
| Employed | 7 | 25.9 | 6 | 12.0 | 0.2004 |
| Unemployed | 20 | 74.1 | 44 | 88.0 | |
| Current marital status | |||||
| Married | 25 | 92.6 | 43 | 86.0 | 0.4814 |
| Not Married | 2 | 7.4 | 7 | 14.0 | |
| Marriage forma | |||||
| Single marriage | 25 | 92.6 | 41 | 82.0 | 1.0000 |
| Polyandry | 1 | 3.7 | 2 | 4.0 | |
| Experience living or working at urban | |||||
| Yes | 23 | 85.2 | 43 | 86.0 | 1.0000 |
| No | 4 | 14.8 | 7 | 14.0 | |
| Alcohol consumption | |||||
| Never drinker | 5 | 18.5 | 29 | 58.0 | 0.0015 |
| Drinker | 22 | 81.5 | 21 | 42.0 | |
| Smoking | |||||
| Never smoker | 18 | 66.7 | 30 | 60.0 | 0.6281 |
| Smoker | 9 | 33.3 | 20 | 40.0 | |
Data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact tests, Welch’s t tests, or Cochran-Armitage trend tests for comparison of variables between males and females
Position: After the first paragraph of section “Subjects’ sociological and physiological characteristics” in the “Results” section
aOne male participant and 7 female participants answered “I do not know” or refused to answer
Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics by sex
| Variables | Male ( | Female ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Age (years) | 53.5 ± 11.3 | 51.2 ± 11.8 | 0.3981 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 3.1 | 23.7 ± 4.2 | 0.9017 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 135.7 ± 26.2 | 116.4 ± 22.6 | 0.0023 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 84.6 ± 13.4 | 78.3 ± 13.1 | 0.0517 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.9 ± 1.9 | 14.4 ± 2.2 | 0.3839 |
| SpO2 (%) | 89.2 ± 3.2 | 88.6 ± 5.1 | 0.5616 |
Data were analyzed by Welch’s t tests for comparison of variables between males and females
a. Data from 1 female participant did not include BMI, SBP, DBP, or SpO2
b. Hemoglobin could not be measured for 5 male participants and 2 female participants due to severe deformation of finger joints or machine troubles
Current situation of joints and arthritis among residents
| Variables | Male ( | Female ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||
| Limitation in usual activity | |||||
| Yes | 12 | 44.4 | 34 | 68.0 | 0.0543 |
| No | 15 | 55.6 | 16 | 32.0 | |
| Satisfaction with current ability | |||||
| Satisfied | 13 | 48.1 | 22 | 44.0 | 0.6825 |
| Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 8 | 29.6 | 15 | 30.0 | |
| Dissatisfied | 6 | 22.2 | 13 | 26.0 | |
| Days with pain in past 7 days | |||||
| 0–2 days | 16 | 59.3 | 21 | 42.0 | 0.2248 |
| 3–5 days | 4 | 14.8 | 12 | 24.0 | |
| 6–7 days | 7 | 25.9 | 17 | 34.0 | |
| Hospitalized for joint symptomsa | |||||
| Yes | 3 | 11.1 | 19 | 38.0 | 0.0163 |
| No | 24 | 88.9 | 30 | 60.0 | |
| Medication for joints | |||||
| Yes | 3 | 11.1 | 17 | 34.0 | 0.0324 |
| No | 24 | 88.9 | 33 | 66.0 | |
Data were analyzed with Fisher’s exact tests or Cochran-Armitage trend tests for comparison of variables between males and females
Position: After the first paragraph of section “The effects of arthritis on daily life, use of medications, and hospital visits” in the “Results” section
aOne female participant did not answer this question
Fig. 1Joint sites with swelling or tenderness by sex. The prevalence of subjects who had no symptoms of arthritis was 18.5% (n = 5) for males and 36.0% (n = 18) for females. No participants complained of hip, toe, or waist swelling or tenderness. Fingers include both hands and feet
Classification of strength of arthritis symptoms by the CDAI
| Variables | Male ( | Female ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||
| CDAI | |||||
| Remission/low | 24 | 88.9 | 32 | 64.0 | 0.0304 |
| Moderate/high | 3 | 11.1 | 18 | 36.0 | |
Data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact tests for comparisons of variables between males and females
Results of biochemical tests and scores by ACR/EULAR classification for rheumatoid arthritis
| Variables | Male ( | Female ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||
| RF | |||||
| Negative | 18 | 78.3 | 33 | 78.6 | 0.9940 |
| Weakly positive | 4 | 17.4 | 7 | 16.7 | |
| Strongly positive | 1 | 4.3 | 2 | 4.8 | |
| Anti-CCP antibody | |||||
| Negative | 23 | 100.0 | 40 | 95.2 | 0.2878 |
| Weakly positive | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Strongly positive | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 4.8 | |
| CRP | |||||
| Low | 16 | 69.6 | 33 | 78.6 | 0.5485 |
| High | 7 | 30.4 | 9 | 21.4 | |
| Hyaluronic acida | |||||
| Low | 17 | 77.3 | 28 | 66.7 | 0.5654 |
| High | 5 | 22.7 | 14 | 33.3 | |
| ACR/EULAR 2010 | |||||
| 0–3 | 18 | 78.3 | 34 | 81.0 | 0.9943 |
| 4–5 | 4 | 17.4 | 5 | 11.9 | |
| 6≦ | 1 | 4.3 | 3 | 7.1 | |
Data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact tests or Cochran-Armitage trend tests for comparison of variables between males and females
Position: After the paragraph in section “Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis by ACR/EULAR 2010 score” in the “Results” section
aOne male participant could not be measured due to a shortage of samples
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis for ACR/EULAR2010 scores
| Correlation coefficient ( | ACR/EULAR2010 | |
| Male | Female | |
| Age | 0.1192 | 0.2083 |
| Marriage status | 0.2171 | 0.0000 |
| Drinking habits | 0.0947 | 0.3349 |
| Smoking habits | − 0.2734 | 0.0859 |
| Living experience in urban | 0.1166 | − 0.2417 |
| Linear regression analysis ( | ACR/EULAR2010 | |
| Male | Female | |
| Age | 0.6080 | 0.1540 |
| Marriage status | 0.1410 | 0.8726 |
| Drinking habits | 0.5133 | 0.0571 |
| Smoking habits | 0.7663 | 0.6258 |
| Living experience in urban | 0.4878 | 0.1513 |
Analysis was performed with 23 males and 42 females who were able to provide blood. The upper half shows the correlation coefficient, and the lower half shows the p value for linear regression analysis
Sociological factors and lifestyle habits that affect ACR/EULAR2010 scores
| Variables | Male ( | |||
| Estimate | 95% CI | Std.Error | ||
| Intercept | − 1.14E−16 | [− 4.43E−01, 4.43E−01] | 2.10E−01 | 1.0000 |
| Age | 8.10E−02 | [− 4.26E−01, 5.88E−01] | 2.41E−01 | 0.7404 |
| Marriage status | 5.02E−01 | [− 3.96E−02, 1.04E−00] | 2.57E−01 | 0.0671 |
| Drinking habits | 1.90E−02 | [− 4.83E−01, 5.21E−01] | 2.38E−01 | 0.9374 |
| Smoking habits | − 3.09E−01 | [− 8.39E−01, 2.22E−01] | 2.51E−01 | 0.2360 |
| Living experience in urban | 1.72E−01 | [− 3.07E−01, 6.50E−01] | 2.27E−01 | 0.4599 |
| Variables | Female ( | |||
| Estimate | 95% CI | Std.Error | ||
| Intercept | 3.12E−16 | [− 2.83E−01, 2.83E−01] | 1.39E−01 | 1.0000 |
| Age | 4.84E−01 | [9.19E−02, 8.76E−01] | 1.93E−01 | 0.0170 |
| Marriage status | 6.61E−02 | [− 2.33E−01, 3.66E−01] | 1.48E−01 | 0.6571 |
| Drinking habits | 1.63E−01 | [− 1.50E−01, 4.76E−01] | 1.54E−01 | 0.2974 |
| Smoking habits | 5.30E−02 | [− 2.53E−01, 3.59E−01] | 1.51E−01 | 0.7276 |
| Living experience in urban | − 5.49E−01 | [− 9.21E−01, 1.77E−01] | 1.84E−01 | 0.0050 |
Analysis was performed with 23 males and 42 females who were able to provide blood samples using multiple linear regression analysis. “Estimate” in the table indicates a standardized parameter estimate, and its 95% CI is also listed
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis for CDAI scores
| Correlation coefficient ( | CDAI | |
| Male | Female | |
| Age | 0.2842 | 0.2151 |
| Marriage status | 0.3103 | 0.2067 |
| Drinking habits | 0.3648 | 0.0463 |
| Smoking habits | 0.2300 | 0.2056 |
| Living experience in urban | 0.0740 | − 0.1964 |
| Linear regression analysis ( | CDAI | |
| Male | Female | |
| Age | 0.6970 | 0.2650 |
| Marriage status | 0.2780 | 0.0490 |
| Drinking habits | 0.3540 | 0.5744 |
| Smoking habits | 0.5817 | 0.0422 |
| Living experience in urban | 0.8030 | 0.2318 |
Analysis was performed with 27 males and 50 females who were able to provide blood. The upper half shows the correlation coefficient, and the lower half shows the p value for linear regression analysis
Sociological factors and lifestyle habits that affect CDAI scores
| Variables | Male ( | |||
| Estimate | 95% CI | Std.Error | ||
| Intercept | 5.30E−18 | [− 4.28E−01, 4.28E−01] | 2.06E−01 | 1.0000 |
| Age | 3.87E−02 | [− 4.56E−01, 5.34E−01] | 2.38E−01 | 0.8720 |
| Marriage status | 1.93E−01 | [− 3.27E−01, 7.13E−01] | 2.50E−01 | 0.4480 |
| Drinking habits | 1.58E−01 | [− 3.35E−01, 6.50E−01] | 2.37E−01 | 0.5130 |
| Smoking habits | 3.48E−03 | [− 5.06E−01, 5.13E−01] | 2.45E−01 | 0.9890 |
| Living experience in urban | − 6.13E−02 | [− 5.13E−01, 3.90E−01] | 2.17E−01 | 0.7810 |
| Variables | Female ( | |||
| Estimate | 95% CI | Std.Error | ||
| Intercept | 1.15E−17 | [− 2.55E−01, 2.55E−01] | 1.27E−01 | 1.0000 |
| Age | 3.05E−01 | [− 3.49E−02, 6.45E−01] | 1.69E−01 | 0.0774 |
| Marriage status | 3.17E−01 | [5.74E−02, 5.77E−01] | 1.29E−01 | 0.0179 |
| Drinking habits | − 7.45E−02 | [− 3.55E−01, 2.06E−01] | 1.39E−01 | 0.5954 |
| Smoking habits | 2.88E−01 | [1.71E−02, 5.59E−01] | 1.34E−01 | 0.0377 |
| Living experience in urban | − 3.69E−01 | [− 6.83E−01, − 5.60E−02] | 1.56E−01 | 0.0219 |
Analysis was performed with 27 males and 50 females by multiple linear regression analysis. “Estimate” in the table indicates a standardized parameter estimate, and its 95% CI is also listed
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis for smoking habits.
| Correlation coefficient ( | Smoking | |
| Male | Female | |
| Activity limitation | − 0.1371 | − 0.0953 |
| Small joint disability | 0.1643 | 0.0310 |
| Large joint disability | 0.3323 | 0.1972 |
| Rheumatoid factor | 0.1149 | 0.1149 |
| CRP | − 0.2717 | − 0.2717 |
| Hyaluronic acid | 0.2297 | 0.2297 |
| Linear regression analysis ( | Smoking | |
| Male | Female | |
| Activity limitation | 0.8119 | 0.5323 |
| Small joint disability | 0.5320 | 0.7570 |
| Large joint disability | 0.5140 | 0.1810 |
| Rheumatoid factor | 0.2920 | 0.4620 |
| CRP | 0.1730 | 0.2560 |
| Hyaluronic acid | 0.0086 | 0.3370 |
Analysis was performed with 23 males and 42 females who were able to provide blood. The upper half shows the correlation coefficient, and the lower half shows the p value for linear regression analysis
Effects of smoking on joint disorders and serological test results
| Variables | Male ( | |||
| Estimate | 95% CI | Std.Error | ||
| Intercept | − 3.54E−01 | [− 5.96E−01, − 1.11E−01] | 1.03E−01 | 0.0108 |
| Activity limitation | 1.56E−01 | [− 1.81E−01, 4.92E−01] | 1.42E−01 | 0.3101 |
| Small joint disability | 3.33E−03 | [− 2.24E−01, 2.30E−01] | 9.60E−02 | 0.9733 |
| Large joint disability | 2.02E−02 | [− 2.74E−01, 3.14E−01] | 1.24E−01 | 0.8756 |
| Rheumatoid factor | 7.71E−03 | [− 2.58E−01, 2.74E−01] | 1.12E−01 | 0.9472 |
| CRP | 4.25E−03 | [− 2.40E−01, 2.49E−01] | 1.03E−01 | 0.9684 |
| Hyaluronic acid | 6.03E−01 | [3.06E−01, 9.01E−01] | 1.26E−01 | 0.0020 |
| Variables | Female ( | |||
| Estimate | 95% CI | Std.Error | ||
| Intercept | − 1.54E−01 | [− 5.53E−01, 2.46E−01] | 1.88E−01 | 0.4269 |
| Activity limitation | − 2.52E−01 | [− 7.09E−01, 2.05E−01] | 2.16E−01 | 0.2598 |
| Small joint disability | 3.70E−01 | [− 1.35E−00, 2.09E−00] | 8.13E−01 | 0.655 |
| Large joint disability | − 1.04E−01 | [− 6.99E−01, 4.92E−01] | 2.81E−01 | 0.7161 |
| Rheumatoid factor | − 4.04E−01 | [− 1.83E−00, 1.02E−00] | 6.74E−01 | 0.5572 |
| CRP | − 3.54E−01 | [− 5.96E−01, − 1.11E−01] | 1.03E−01 | 0.0108 |
| Hyaluronic acid | 1.56E−01 | [− 1.81E−01, 4.92E−01] | 1.42E−01 | 0.3101 |
Analysis was performed with 23 males and 42 females who were able to provide blood samples using multiple linear regression analysis. “Estimate” in the table indicates a standardized parameter estimate, and its 95% CI is also listed
Position: After the paragraph in section “Effects of smoking habits on joint symptoms” in the “Results” section (after Table 10)