| Literature DB >> 35366800 |
Yukun Cao1,2, Heshui Shi3,4, Guozhu Shao5,6, Yue Cui5,6, Xiaoyu Han5,6, Jia Liu5,6, Yumin Li5,6, Na Li5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to dynamically monitor the myocardial structure and function changes in diabetic mini-pigs by 1.5 T cardiac magnetic resonance.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance; Diabetes mellius; Epicardial adipose tissue; Feature tracking
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35366800 PMCID: PMC8976391 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02597-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1A The middle section of the left ventricular short axis was scanned; B T1 mapping image in mid short axis views after the mold was made; C ECV mapping in mid short axis views after the mold was made
Fig. 2Representative images of epicardial adipose tissue (A) and 3D model of epicardial adipose tissue drawn by CVI software (B)
Fig. 3Representative contour of the endocardium and endocardium of the left ventricular in the short axis, 2-, 4-chamber (A, B and C, respectively)
MRI characteristics of the diabetic mini-pigs
| Characteristics | Modeling 0 M | Modeling 1.5 M | Modeling 3 M | Modeling 4.5 M | Modeling 6 M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVEDV (mL/m2) | 28.1 (25.2, 30.2) | 28.7 (26.4, 29.8) | 27.9 (27.1, 31.3) | 26.4 (26, 32.7) | 28.7 (26.5, 30.7) | 0.694 |
| LVESV (mL/m2) | 12.9 (9.1, 16.6) | 12.1 (9.7, 15.9) | 12.8 (10.1, 15.6) | 12.4 (9.5, 17.2) | 13.1 (10.2, 16.8) | 0.871 |
| LVEF (%) | 59.9 (57.2, 64.2) | 61.1 (58.3, 66.9) | 60.8 (55.6, 68.2) | 61.5 (58.6, 66.1) | 61.8 (58.4, 67.6) | 0.568 |
| LVM (g/m2) | 24.5 (23.4, 26.7) | 26.9 (24.9, 27.3) | 34.5 (31.9, 35.6) | 37.9 (36.1, 38.5) | 42.7 (41.4, 44.6) | < 0.001* |
| LV remodeling index | 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) | 0.9 (0.8, 1.0) | 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) | 1.4 (1.3, 1.4) | 1.7 (1.6, 1.7) | < 0.001* |
| Native T1 (ms) | 1005.5 (992.6, 1010.7) | 1006.7 (990.5, 1012.4) | 1014.7 (1001.8, 1020.5) | 1020.2 (1007.3, 1025.8) | 1028.7 (1015.5, 1035.6) | 0.041* |
| EAT (ml) | 16.1 (14.5, 18.2) | 17.8 (16.4, 19.7) | 16.5 (16.2, 18.9) | 19.3 (18.4, 22.9) | 24.6 (20.8, 26.9) | 0.020* |
| ECV (%) | 21.4 (20.2, 23.9) | 21.8 (21.1, 24.2) | 23.4 (23.3, 26.2) | 25.9 (24.8, 27.8) | 28.9 (26.7, 30.3) | 0.011* |
| LVGRS (%) | 57.9 (56.7, 60.9) | 62.3 (58.1, 62.3) | 59.7 (56.3, 60.3) | 60.7 (56.2, 61.2) | 58.2 (55.3, 62.0) | 1.000 |
| LVGCS (%) | − 22.9 (− 22.3, − 23.8) | − 22.1 (− 20.2, − 23.1) | − 23.9 (− 23.4, − 24.2) | − 22.2 (− 21.2, − 23.3) | − 22.1 (− 20.8, − 24.5) | 0.672 |
| LVGLS (%) | − 22.8 (− 21.4, − 23.9) | − 22.3 (− 21.9, − 24.8) | − 20.2 (− 19.8, − 22.3) | − 18.7 (− 18.5, − 21.0) | − 17.4 (− 17.2, − 19.2) | 0.008* |
LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, left ventricular mass; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; ECV, extracellular volume; LVGRS, left ventricular global radial strain; LVGCS, left ventricular global circumferential strain; LVGLS, left ventricle global longitudinal; LV remodeling index = LV mass/volume ratio; P value for 0 vs 6 month was showed (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 4The change trend graph of Native T1 (A), ECV (B), EAT (C), LVGLS (D), LVM (E) and LV remodeling index (F) at different time points. LVM, left ventricular mass; ECV, extracellular volume; GLS, global longitudinal; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue. P value for 0 vs 6 month was showed
Fig. 5A General morphological anatomy of pig heart; B Section anatomy in base, mid, apical short axis views were presented; C After modeling 6 M, Masson staining of the left ventricular myocardial base segment (blue = fibrosis, red = myocardial fiber)