| Literature DB >> 35366607 |
Zenaide M N Quezado1, Sayuri Kamimura2, Meghann Smith2, Xunde Wang3, Michael R Heaven4, Sirsendu Jana4, Sebastian Vogel2, Patricia Zerfas5, Christian A Combs6, Luis E F Almeida2, Quan Li7, Martha Quezado8, Iren Horkayne-Szakaly9, Penelope A Kosinski10, Shaoxia Yu10, Unnati Kapadnis10, Charles Kung10, Lenny Dang10, Paul Wakim11, William A Eaton7, Abdu I Alayash4, Swee Lay Thein3.
Abstract
Polymerization of deoxygenated sickle hemoglobin (HbS) leads to erythrocyte sickling. Enhancing activity of the erythrocyte glycolytic pathway has anti-sickling potential as this reduces 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) and increases ATP, factors that decrease HbS polymerization and improve erythrocyte membrane integrity. These factors can be modulated by mitapivat, which activates erythrocyte pyruvate kinase (PKR) and improves sickling kinetics in SCD patients. We investigated mechanisms by which mitapivat may impact SCD by examining its effects in the Townes SCD mouse model. Control (HbAA) and sickle (HbSS) mice were treated with mitapivat or vehicle. Surprisingly, HbSS had higher PKR protein, higher ATP, and lower 2,3-DPG levels, compared to HbAA mice, in contrast with humans with SCD, in whom 2,3-DPG is elevated compared to healthy subjects. Despite our inability to investigate 2,3-DPG-mediated sickling and hemoglobin effects, mitapivat yielded potential benefits in HbSS mice. Mitapivat further increased ATP without significantly changing 2,3-DPG or hemoglobin levels, and decreased levels of leukocytosis, erythrocyte oxidative stress, and the percentage of erythrocytes that retained mitochondria in HbSS mice. These data suggest that, even though Townes HbSS mice have increased PKR activity, further activation of PKR with mitapivat yields potentially beneficial effects that are independent of changes in sickling or hemoglobin levels. Published by Elsevier Inc.Entities:
Keywords: Oxidative stress; Proteomics; Pyruvate kinase; Sickle cell; anemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35366607 PMCID: PMC9148618 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2022.102660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Cells Mol Dis ISSN: 1079-9796 Impact factor: 2.372