Fred Stephen Sarfo1, Esther Olasoji2, Grant P Banfill2, Bruce Ovbiagele3, Alexis N Simpkins2. 1. Department of Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Race and geographic differences in the prevalence and predictors of hypertension in stroke survivors have been reported, but apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) among stroke survivors by race (African ancestry vs. non-Hispanic Caucasians) and by geography (continental Africa vs. the United States) are under studied. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study using ethically approved stroke registries from the University of Florida and the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. Univariate and multivariate regression was used to evaluate for differences in prevalence of aTRH and associations with clinical covariates. RESULTS: Harmonized data were available for 3,365 stroke survivors of which 943 (28.0%) were indigenous Africans, 558 (16.6%) African Americans, and 1,864 (55.4%) non-Hispanic Caucasians with median ages (interquartile range) of 59 (49-68), 61 (55-72), and 70 (62-78) years, P < 0.0001. The overall frequency of aTRH was 18.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.2%-19.8%) with 42.7% (95% CI: 39.6%-46.0%) among indigenous Africans, 16.1% (95% CI: 13.2%-19.5%) among African Americans, and 6.9% (95% CI: 5.8%-8.2%) among non-Hispanic Caucasians, P < 0.0001. Five factors associated with aTRH: age, adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of 0.99 (0.98-0.99), female sex 0.70 (0.56-0.87), cigarette smoking 1.98 (1.36-2.90), intracerebral hemorrhage 1.98 (1.57-2.48), and Black race namely indigenous Africans 4.42 (3.41-5.73) and African Americans 2.44 (1.81-3.29). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies are needed to investigate the contribution of socioeconomic disparities in the prevalence aTRH in those with African Ancestry to explore the long-term impact, and evaluate effective therapeutic interventions in this subpopulation.
BACKGROUND: Race and geographic differences in the prevalence and predictors of hypertension in stroke survivors have been reported, but apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) among stroke survivors by race (African ancestry vs. non-Hispanic Caucasians) and by geography (continental Africa vs. the United States) are under studied. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study using ethically approved stroke registries from the University of Florida and the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. Univariate and multivariate regression was used to evaluate for differences in prevalence of aTRH and associations with clinical covariates. RESULTS: Harmonized data were available for 3,365 stroke survivors of which 943 (28.0%) were indigenous Africans, 558 (16.6%) African Americans, and 1,864 (55.4%) non-Hispanic Caucasians with median ages (interquartile range) of 59 (49-68), 61 (55-72), and 70 (62-78) years, P < 0.0001. The overall frequency of aTRH was 18.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.2%-19.8%) with 42.7% (95% CI: 39.6%-46.0%) among indigenous Africans, 16.1% (95% CI: 13.2%-19.5%) among African Americans, and 6.9% (95% CI: 5.8%-8.2%) among non-Hispanic Caucasians, P < 0.0001. Five factors associated with aTRH: age, adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of 0.99 (0.98-0.99), female sex 0.70 (0.56-0.87), cigarette smoking 1.98 (1.36-2.90), intracerebral hemorrhage 1.98 (1.57-2.48), and Black race namely indigenous Africans 4.42 (3.41-5.73) and African Americans 2.44 (1.81-3.29). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies are needed to investigate the contribution of socioeconomic disparities in the prevalence aTRH in those with African Ancestry to explore the long-term impact, and evaluate effective therapeutic interventions in this subpopulation.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Mary Haverbusch; Padmini Sekar; Jane Khoury; Laura Sauerbeck; Charles J Moomaw; Alexander Schneider; Brett Kissela; Dawn Kleindorfer; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-03-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Erika S Jones; J D Spence; Adam D Mcintyre; Justus Nondi; Kennedy Gogo; Adeseye Akintunde; Daniel G Hackam; Brian L Rayner Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: David A Calhoun; Daniel Jones; Stephen Textor; David C Goff; Timothy P Murphy; Robert D Toto; Anthony White; William C Cushman; William White; Domenic Sica; Keith Ferdinand; Thomas D Giles; Bonita Falkner; Robert M Carey Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven M Smith; Tianyao Huo; Yan Gong; Eileen Handberg; Martha Gulati; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Valery L Feigin; Gregory A Roth; Mohsen Naghavi; Priya Parmar; Rita Krishnamurthi; Sumeet Chugh; George A Mensah; Bo Norrving; Ivy Shiue; Marie Ng; Kara Estep; Kelly Cercy; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad H Forouzanfar Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 44.182