Literature DB >> 35366307

Stair-step strategy and immunomodulatory feed ingredient supplementation for grazing heat-stressed 
Bos indicus-influenced beef heifers.

Philipe Moriel1, Elizabeth A Palmer1, Rhaiza A Oliveira1, Marcelo Vedovatto1, Vinicius S Izquierdo1, Hiran M Silva1, Jaime Garzon1, Rhaiza Oliveira1, Jeffery W Dailey2, Jeffery A Carroll2, Nicole C Burdick Sanchez2, Thiago Martins3, Mario Binelli3, Joao M B Vendramini1.   

Abstract

On day 0 of years 1 and 2, 64 Brangus crossbred heifers per year were stratified by initial body weight (BW) and age (mean = 257 ± 20 kg and 271 ± 22 d) and allocated into 16 bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures (4 heifers per pasture per yr). Treatments were randomly allotted to pastures in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (4 pastures per treatment per yr). Treatments consisted of concentrate dry matter (DM) supplementation at 1.50% of BW from days 0 to 100 (CON) or concentrate DM supplementation at 1.05% of BW from days 0 to 49 and 1.95% of BW from days 50 to 100 (SST). Then, each respective supplementation strategy was added or not with immunomodulatory feed ingredients from days 0 to 100 (OMN; 4 g/45 kg of BW). Heifers were assigned to an estrus synchronization protocol from days 100 to 114. Heifers detected in estrus from days 111 to 114 were inseminated (AI) 12 h after estrus detection. Heifers not detected in estrus were timed AI on day 114. All heifers were exposed to Angus bulls from days 120 to 210 (1 bull per pasture). Effects of supplementation strategy × OMN inclusion × hour were detected (P < 0.0001) only for intravaginal temperature from days 26 to 30, which were the least (P ≤ 0.03) for SST heifers offered OMN supplementation and did not differ (P ≥ 0.17) among all remaining treatments from 0830 to 1600 hours. Effects of supplementation strategy × OMN inclusion and OMN inclusion were not detected (P ≥ 0.12) for any variable, except for the percentage of heifers detected in estrus, which was greater (P = 0.01) for heifers supplemented with vs. without OMN. Total concentrate DM offered from days 0 to 100 and heifer BW on days 0 and 56 did not differ (P ≥ 0.49) between CON and SST heifers, but SST heifers were heavier (P ≤ 0.01) on days 100 and 210 compared with CON heifers. Body surface temperature on day 25 and plasma IGF-1 concentrations on day 75 were greater (P ≤ 0.04) for SST vs. CON heifers. Percentage of pubertal heifers, heifers detected in estrus, and pregnancy to AI did not differ (P = 0.36) between SST and CON heifers but the final pregnancy percentage was greater (P = 0.04) for SST vs. CON heifers. Thus, OMN supplementation decreased the intravaginal temperature of SST heifers but failed to improve their growth and reproduction, whereas the SST strategy improved body thermoregulation, growth, and final pregnancy percentage of heat-stressed Bos indicus-influenced beef heifers compared with a constant concentrate supplementation strategy.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Bos indicuszzm321990 ; beef heifers; growth; immunomodulatory; puberty; stair-step

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35366307      PMCID: PMC9047175          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  43 in total

1.  Effects of controlled heat stress on ovarian function of dairy cattle. 2. Heifers.

Authors:  S J Wilson; C J Kirby; A T Koenigsfeld; D H Keisler; M C Lucy
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Influence of timing of gain on growth and reproductive performance of beef replacement heifers.

Authors:  J M Lynch; G C Lamb; B L Miller; R T Brandt; R C Cochran; J E Minton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Use of a stair-step compensatory gain nutritional regimen to program the onset of puberty in beef heifers.

Authors:  R C Cardoso; B R C Alves; L D Prezotto; J F Thorson; L O Tedeschi; D H Keisler; C S Park; M Amstalden; G L Williams
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Influence of management decisions during heifer development on enhancing reproductive success and cow longevity1.

Authors:  Adam F Summers; Shelby L Rosasco; Eric J Scholljegerdes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of dietary energy and protein on bovine follicular dynamics and embryo production in vitro: associations with the ovarian insulin-like growth factor system.

Authors:  D G Armstrong; T G McEvoy; G Baxter; J J Robinson; C O Hogg; K J Woad; R Webb; K D Sinclair
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Effect of heat-stress on bovine embryo development in vitro.

Authors:  D P Ryan; E G Blakewood; J W Lynn; L Munyakazi; R A Godke
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Involvement of apoptosis in disruption of developmental competence of bovine oocytes by heat shock during maturation.

Authors:  Z Roth; P J Hansen
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 8.  Managing Heat Stress Episodes in Confined Cattle.

Authors:  Kevin F Sullivan; Terry L Mader
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.357

9.  Determination of the optimum contribution of Brahman genetics in an Angus-Brahman multibreed herd for regulation of body temperature during hot weather.

Authors:  Serdal Dikmen; Raluca G Mateescu; Mauricio A Elzo; Peter J Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Impacts of shade on cattle well-being in the beef supply chain.

Authors:  Lily N Edwards-Callaway; M Caitlin Cramer; Caitlin N Cadaret; Elizabeth J Bigler; Terry E Engle; John J Wagner; Daniel L Clark
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.