Huybrecht T'jollyn1, Oliver Ackaert2, Caly Chien3, Angela Lopez-Gitlitz4, Sharon McCarthy5, Carlos Perez Ruixo1, Lawrence Karsh6, Kim Chi7, Simon Chowdhury8, Juan-Jose Perez Ruixo1, Neeraj Agarwal9. 1. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research and Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium. 2. Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research and Development, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium. oackaert@its.jnj.com. 3. Clinical Pharmacology, Hutchison MediPharma International, Florham Park, NJ, USA. 4. Janssen Research & Development, Los Angeles, USA. 5. Janssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ, USA. 6. The Urology Center of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA. 7. BC Cancer and Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, Canada. 8. Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Hospitals and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK. 9. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been approved for treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) based on data from phase 3 TITAN study. This analysis was conducted to describe pharmacokinetics of apalutamide and N-desmethyl-apalutamide and explore relationships between apalutamide exposure and selected clinical efficacy and safety observations. METHODS: 1052 patients were randomized to apalutamide + ADT (n = 525) or placebo + ADT (n = 527). A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was applied. Cox regression analysis investigated the relationships between apalutamide exposure and overall survival (OS; n = 1004) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; n = 1003). Logistic regression analysis assessed the relationships between apalutamide exposure and selected clinically relevant adverse events (n = 1051). RESULTS: Apalutamide + ADT treatment was efficacious in extending rPFS and OS versus placebo + ADT. Within a relatively narrow apalutamide exposure range (coefficient of variation: 22%), no statistical association was detected between rPFS, OS and apalutamide exposure quartiles. Incidence of skin rash and pruritus increased significantly with increasing apalutamide exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in apalutamide exposure were not associated with clinically relevant differences in rPFS or OS in patients with mCSPC. Patients with increased apalutamide exposure are more likely to develop skin rash and pruritus. Dose reductions may improve these adverse events, based on an individual risk-benefit approach.
PURPOSE: Apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been approved for treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) based on data from phase 3 TITAN study. This analysis was conducted to describe pharmacokinetics of apalutamide and N-desmethyl-apalutamide and explore relationships between apalutamide exposure and selected clinical efficacy and safety observations. METHODS: 1052 patients were randomized to apalutamide + ADT (n = 525) or placebo + ADT (n = 527). A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was applied. Cox regression analysis investigated the relationships between apalutamide exposure and overall survival (OS; n = 1004) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; n = 1003). Logistic regression analysis assessed the relationships between apalutamide exposure and selected clinically relevant adverse events (n = 1051). RESULTS: Apalutamide + ADT treatment was efficacious in extending rPFS and OS versus placebo + ADT. Within a relatively narrow apalutamide exposure range (coefficient of variation: 22%), no statistical association was detected between rPFS, OS and apalutamide exposure quartiles. Incidence of skin rash and pruritus increased significantly with increasing apalutamide exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in apalutamide exposure were not associated with clinically relevant differences in rPFS or OS in patients with mCSPC. Patients with increased apalutamide exposure are more likely to develop skin rash and pruritus. Dose reductions may improve these adverse events, based on an individual risk-benefit approach.
Authors: Kim N Chi; Neeraj Agarwal; Anders Bjartell; Byung Ha Chung; Andrea J Pereira de Santana Gomes; Robert Given; Álvaro Juárez Soto; Axel S Merseburger; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Hirotsugu Uemura; Dingwei Ye; Kris Deprince; Vahid Naini; Jinhui Li; Shinta Cheng; Margaret K Yu; Ke Zhang; Julie S Larsen; Sharon McCarthy; Simon Chowdhury Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronald de Vries; Frank Jacobs; Geert Mannens; Jan Snoeys; Filip Cuyckens; Caly Chien; Peter Ward Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Nicholas D James; Johann S de Bono; Melissa R Spears; Noel W Clarke; Malcolm D Mason; David P Dearnaley; Alastair W S Ritchie; Claire L Amos; Clare Gilson; Rob J Jones; David Matheson; Robin Millman; Gerhardt Attard; Simon Chowdhury; William R Cross; Silke Gillessen; Christopher C Parker; J Martin Russell; Dominik R Berthold; Chris Brawley; Fawzi Adab; San Aung; Alison J Birtle; Jo Bowen; Susannah Brock; Prabir Chakraborti; Catherine Ferguson; Joanna Gale; Emma Gray; Mohan Hingorani; Peter J Hoskin; Jason F Lester; Zafar I Malik; Fiona McKinna; Neil McPhail; Julian Money-Kyrle; Joe O'Sullivan; Omi Parikh; Andrew Protheroe; Angus Robinson; Narayanan N Srihari; Carys Thomas; John Wagstaff; James Wylie; Anjali Zarkar; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martin R Stockler; Andrew J Martin; Ian D Davis; Haryana M Dhillon; Stephen D Begbie; Kim N Chi; Simon Chowdhury; Xanthi Coskinas; Mark Frydenberg; Wendy E Hague; Lisa G Horvath; Anthony M Joshua; Nicola J Lawrence; Gavin M Marx; John McCaffrey; Ray McDermott; Margaret McJannett; Scott A North; Francis Parnis; Wendy R Parulekar; David W Pook; M Neil Reaume; Shahneen Sandhu; Alvin Tan; Thean Hsiang Tan; Alastair Thomson; Francisco Vera-Badillo; Scott G Williams; Diana G Winter; Sonia Yip; Alison Y Zhang; Robert R Zielinski; Christopher J Sweeney Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: William T Lowrance; Rodney H Breau; Roger Chou; Brian F Chapin; Tony Crispino; Robert Dreicer; David F Jarrard; Adam S Kibel; Todd M Morgan; Alicia K Morgans; William K Oh; Matthew J Resnick; Anthony L Zietman; Michael S Cookson Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Karim Fizazi; NamPhuong Tran; Luis Fein; Nobuaki Matsubara; Alfredo Rodriguez-Antolin; Boris Y Alekseev; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Dingwei Ye; Susan Feyerabend; Andrew Protheroe; Peter De Porre; Thian Kheoh; Youn C Park; Mary B Todd; Kim N Chi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew R Smith; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Charles J Ryan; William R Berry; Neal D Shore; Glenn Liu; Joshi J Alumkal; Celestia S Higano; Edna Chow Maneval; Rajesh Bandekar; Carla J de Boer; Margaret K Yu; Dana E Rathkopf Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 20.096