| Literature DB >> 35365430 |
Edmond Awad1, Sydney Levine2, Michael Anderson3, Susan Leigh Anderson4, Vincent Conitzer5, M J Crockett6, Jim A C Everett7, Theodoros Evgeniou8, Alison Gopnik9, Julian C Jamison10, Tae Wan Kim11, S Matthew Liao12, Michelle N Meyer13, John Mikhail14, Kweku Opoku-Agyemang15, Jana Schaich Borg16, Juliana Schroeder17, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong18, Marija Slavkovik19, Josh B Tenenbaum20.
Abstract
Technological advances are enabling roles for machines that present novel ethical challenges. The study of 'AI ethics' has emerged to confront these challenges, and connects perspectives from philosophy, computer science, law, and economics. Less represented in these interdisciplinary efforts is the perspective of cognitive science. We propose a framework - computational ethics - that specifies how the ethical challenges of AI can be partially addressed by incorporating the study of human moral decision-making. The driver of this framework is a computational version of reflective equilibrium (RE), an approach that seeks coherence between considered judgments and governing principles. The framework has two goals: (i) to inform the engineering of ethical AI systems, and (ii) to characterize human moral judgment and decision-making in computational terms. Working jointly towards these two goals will create the opportunity to integrate diverse research questions, bring together multiple academic communities, uncover new interdisciplinary research topics, and shed light on centuries-old philosophical questions.Entities:
Keywords: AI ethics; computation; ethics; machine ethics; moral cognition; moral psychology
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35365430 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Cogn Sci ISSN: 1364-6613 Impact factor: 20.229