| Literature DB >> 35365230 |
Kelsy Robinson1,2, Qing Yang1, Sydney Stewart1,3, Melanie A Whitmore1, Guolong Zhang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extensive work has been accomplished to characterize the intestinal bacterial community, known as the microbiota, and its association with host health and disease. However, very little is known about the spatiotemporal development and the origin of a minor intestinal fungal community, known as the mycobiota, in humans and animals, particularly in avian species.Entities:
Keywords: Fungal community; Microbiome; Mycobiome; Poultry
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35365230 PMCID: PMC8976367 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01252-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Diversity and biogeography of the intestinal mycobiome of day-42 chickens. The digesta was collected from different gastrointestinal segments from 12 broiler chickens on day 42 and subjected to DNA isolation and ITS2 sequencing. a Shannon Index showing α-diversity of the intestinal mycobiome. Significance was determined using Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc Mann–Whitney U test. The bars not sharing a common superscript are considered significantly different (P < 0.05). PCoA of weighted (b) and unweighted UniFrac distances (c) was plotted to display β-diversity of the mycobiome in different intestinal segments. R and P values were calculated using ANOSIM with 999 permutations and indicated in each plot. Mean relative abundances (%) of the mycobiota in different segments of the gastrointestinal tract are displayed at the phylum (d) and genus (e) levels, while relative abundances (%) at the ASV level (f) were indicated by individual animals. Only the five most abundant genera and ten most abundant ASVs are shown
Fig. 2Biogeography of the core mycobiome and microbial burden along the gastrointestinal tract of day-42 chickens. a Relative abundances (%) of the ten most abundant core fungal ASVs. b Absolute abundances (genome copy number/g digesta) of the fungal and bacterial populations as well as the ratios of the fungal to bacterial genome copy number. Statistics was performed with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. The values in a row not sharing a common superscript are considered significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Successional changes in diversity and relative abundance of the chicken intestinal mycobiota throughout a 42-day production cycle. The digesta was collected from four different intestinal segments at seven different time points with 12 broilers per time point. a Shannon Index showing α-diversity of the intestinal mycobiome. Significance was determined using Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc Mann–Whitney U test. The bars not sharing a common superscript are considered significantly different (P < 0.05). PCoA of weighted (b) and unweighted UniFrac distances (c) was plotted to display β-diversity of the intestinal mycobiome at different ages. R and P values were calculated using ANOSIM with 999 permutations and indicated in each plot. d Mean relative abundances (%) of the ten most abundant fungal ASVs at different ages in four different intestinal segments
Fig. 4Succession and microbial burden of the chicken core intestinal mycobiome. Mean relative abundances (%) of the ten most abundant core fungal ASVs are indicated in pie charts, while absolute abundances (genome copy number/g digesta) of the fungal and bacterial populations as well as the ratios of the fungal to bacterial genome copy number are also shown below each segment on each sampling day. Statistics was performed with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. The values in a row not sharing a common superscript are considered significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Absolute abundance of the chicken intestinal mycobiota and microbiota. Absolute abundances (genome copy number/g digesta) of the fungal and bacterial populations are shown along the gastrointestinal tract of day-42 broilers (a) and in four intestinal segments on different sampling days (b) with 12 samples per bar. Statistics was performed with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. The fungal (red ) and bacterial (blue) bars not sharing a common superscript are considered significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 6Sources of the chicken intestinal mycobiota. a Mean relative abundances (%) of the ten most abundant fungal ASVs in different environmental and pooled intestinal samples. b Mean relative contributions (%) of different environmental and pooled intestinal sample types to the initial establishment of the chicken intestinal mycobiota estimated using SourceTracker [37]