Literature DB >> 35364738

Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction reduces the rate of reoperation for graft failure or secondary meniscal lesions in young athletes.

Pierre Laboudie1, Adil Douiri2, Nicolas Bouguennec2, Alexandre Biset2, Nicolas Graveleau2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Graft failure and secondary meniscal tears are major concerns after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young athletes. The aim was to evaluate the link between ACL reconstruction with and without anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction and outcomes in young patients participating in pivoting sports.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of data collected prospectively. Patients less than 20 years, involved in pivoting sports and undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with a quadruple hamstring tendon (4HT) graft or 4HT graft combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (4HT + ALL) were included. Survival analysis was performed to identify the prognostic indicators for reoperation due to graft failure or secondary meniscal lesions. Knee laxity was assessed and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 203 patients (mean (± SD) age: 16.3 ± 2 years) with a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 0.9 (range: 3.3‒6.8) years were included. There were 101 4HT and 102 4HT + ALL grafts. Graft rupture rates were 11.9% for 4HT grafts and 5.8% for 4HT + ALL grafts (n.s.). There were 9.9% secondary meniscal procedures for 4HT grafts vs. 1.9% for 4HT + ALL grafts (p = 0.02). With reoperation for graft failure or secondary meniscal lesions at final follow-up as the endpoint, survival was better in the 4HT + ALL group (91.4% vs. 77.8%, respectively; p = 0.03). Absence of ALL reconstruction (HR = 4.9 [95%CI: 1.4-17.9]; p = 0.01) and preoperative side-to-side laxity > 3 mm (HR = 3.1 [95%CI: 1.03-9.1]; p = 0.04) were independently associated with an increased rate of reoperations. Mean (± SD) side-to-side laxity was 1.3 ± 1.3 mm (range: - 2 to 5) for 4HT grafts vs. 0.9 ± 1.3 mm (range: - 6 to 4.8) for 4HT + ALL grafts (n.s.) 6 months post-surgery. The rate of return to the same sport at the same level was 42.2% for 4HT grafts vs. 52% for 4HT + ALL grafts (n.s.). There was no significant difference in subjective outcomes including PROMs between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Combined ALL + ACL reconstruction reduced the rate of graft failure and secondary meniscal injury in young athletes when compared to ACL reconstruction alone. Subjective results were comparable, with a similar rate of complications. Combined reconstruction should be preferred in this young population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterolateral ligament; Graft rupture; Knee; Return to sport

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35364738     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06956-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  52 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Combined Anterior and Anterolateral Stabilization of the Knee Using Hamstring Tendons and Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation Device: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Achilleas Boutsiadis; Paul Brossard; Jean-Claude Panisset; Nicolas Graveleau; Johannes Barth
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-04-10

Review 2.  Anatomy of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Diego Ariel de Lima; Camilo Partezani Helito; Lana Lacerda de Lima; Daniel de Castro Silva; Maria Luzete Costa Cavalcante; José Alberto Dias Leite
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Is osteoarthritis an inevitable consequence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven Claes; Laurens Hermie; René Verdonk; Johan Bellemans; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Study of the Nerve Endings and Mechanoreceptors of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee.

Authors:  Diego Ariel de Lima; Camilo Partezani Helito; Lana Lacerda de Lima; José Alberto Dias Leite; Maria Luzete Costa Cavalcante
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel Andernord; Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Mattias Ylander; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Femoral Positioning of the Anterolateral Ligament Graft With and Without Ultrasound Location of the Lateral Epicondyle.

Authors:  Marie Castoldi; Marie Cavaignac; Vincent Marot; Nicolas Reina; Dany Mouarbes; Emilie Berard; Etienne Cavaignac
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Factors affecting return to play and graft re-rupture after primary ACL reconstruction in professional footballers.

Authors:  Ganesh Balendra; Mary Jones; Kyle A Borque; Lukas Willinger; Vitor Hugo Pinheiro; Andy Williams
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Survival of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and the contralateral ACL at a minimum of 15 years.

Authors:  Henry E Bourke; Lucy J Salmon; Alison Waller; Victoria Patterson; Leo A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Autograft diameter in ACL reconstruction: size does matter.

Authors:  Fahad N A Alkhalaf; Sager Hanna; Mohammed Saleh Hattab Alkhaldi; Fares Alenezi; Aliaa Khaja
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2021-03-22

10.  How to Test the Anterolateral Ligament With Ultrasound.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Gregoire Laumond; Nicolas Reina; Karine Wytrykowski; Jérôme Murgier; Marie Faruch; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-12-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Higher return to pre-injury type of sports after revision anterior ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

Authors:  Michèle N J Keizer; Reinoud W Brouwer; Feike de Graaff; Roy A G Hoogeslag
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A Review of Current Concepts of the Anterolateral Complex of the Knee.

Authors:  Vasileios Athanasiou; Andreas Panagopoulos; Antonios Kouzelis; Zinon T Kokkalis; John Lakoumentas; Konstantinos Katsanos; John Gliatis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-04

Review 3.  Anatomy, Biomechanics, and Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Joint.

Authors:  Jun-Gu Park; Seung-Beom Han; Chul-Soo Lee; Ok Hee Jeon; Ki-Mo Jang
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.