Literature DB >> 35364734

Risk factors of residual pivot-shift after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kohei Kamada1, Takehiko Matsushita2, Kanto Nagai1, Yuichi Hoshino1, Daisuke Araki1, Noriyuki Kanzaki1, Tomoyuki Matsumoto1, Takahiro Niikura1, Ryosuke Kuroda1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is considered a successful procedure, residual pivot-shift after surgery remains to be solved. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the risk factors of residual pivot-shift after anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACLR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 164 patients who underwent primary anatomic DB-ACLR between January 2014 and December 2019 and screw removal after the index ACLR in our hospital were included in this retrospective case-control study. The manual pivot-shift test was performed under general anesthesia during screw removal surgery, and patients with grade 1 or higher pivot-shift were classified as the positive pivot-shift group, and those with grade 0 were defined as the negative pivot-shift group. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with postoperative residual pivot-shift. Assessment included sex, age, time to surgery, preoperative Tegner activity scale, preoperative pivot-shift grade, preoperative anterior tibial translation by the KT-2000 arthrometer measurement, meniscus injury and its surgical procedure, knee hyperextension, cartilage damage, Segond fracture, medial and lateral posterior tibial slope, lateral-medial slope asymmetry, participation in pivoting sport/activity at the time of injury, and return to sports at postoperative one year line.
RESULTS: Postoperative positive pivot-shift was observed in 14 (8.5%) of 164 patients. The KT-2000 measurement at 1-year postoperatively was significantly higher in the residual pivot-shift-positive group than in the negative group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age of patients < 20 years [P < 0.05, odds ratio (OR): 6.1)], preoperative pivot-shift grade (P < 0.05, OR: 4.4), and hyperextended knee (P < 0.05, OR: 11.8) were risk factors of postoperative pivot-shift. There were no statistically significant differences between other variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients < 20 years of age, with high-grade preoperative pivot-shift, or hyperextended knees had a higher risk of residual postoperative pivot-shift.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Double bundle; Hyperextension of the knee; Residual pivot-shift; Risk factor

Year:  2022        PMID: 35364734     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04428-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  46 in total

1.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis--does anatomy matter?

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Sebastian Kopf; James J Irrgang; Leendert Blankevoort; Mohit Bhandari; Freddie H Fu; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system.

Authors:  Daisuke Araki; Ryosuke Kuroda; Seiji Kubo; Norifumi Fujita; Katsumasa Tei; Koji Nishimoto; Yuichi Hoshino; Takehiko Matsushita; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability.

Authors:  Masayoshi Yagi; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Randy Mascarenhas; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Eli T Sayegh; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Charles Bush-Joseph; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle.

Authors:  Eiji Kondo; Azhar M Merican; Kazunori Yasuda; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5-9 years after surgery.

Authors:  Håkan Jonsson; Katrine Riklund-Ahlström; Jonas Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-10

Review 8.  Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Leblanc; Marcin Kowalczuk; Nicole Andruszkiewicz; Nicole Simunovic; Forough Farrokhyar; Travis Lee Turnbull; Richard E Debski; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Volker Musahl; Mohit Bhandari; Max Petzold; Freddie H Fu; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring autograft and accelerated rehabilitation: a 10-year prospective study on clinical results, knee osteoarthritis and its predictors.

Authors:  Rob P A Janssen; Arthur W F du Mée; Juliette van Valkenburg; Harm A G M Sala; Carroll M Tseng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.