Qian Yang1, Qi Jiang1, Man Man Niu1, Guo Zhen Fan1, Peng Hu2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: hupeng28@aliyun.com.
To the Editor: We read with great interest the retrospective matched cohort study from Massachusetts by Pahalyants et al. The authors presented the data of 7361 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) treated with immunosuppressive biologics and 74,910 matched controls and found that a diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 infection was less likely in the patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors than in the matched controls; whereas, overall, biologics did not increase the risk of a positive COVID-19 diagnosis, adjusting for demographics, comorbidity burden, and local infection rates. According to the patient baseline characteristics listed in Table I of the study by Pahalyants et al, the proportions of the prescribed biologics were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors 55.9%, CD20-directed antibody (rituximab) 15.6%, and interleukin 4A inhibitor 8.6%. We hypothesize that Pahlyants et al1 underestimated the risk of COVID-19 among patients treated with rituximab given the lower proportion of rituximab usage reported and potential alterations in behavior among patients with IMIDs to decrease their risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The accumulation of evidence from recent literature has emphasized that rituximab could largely blunt the humoral immune response to vaccines and confer an additional susceptibility to COVID-19 in patients with IMIDs. In recent clinical surveys from Europe, it was shown that only 39% of rituximab-treated patients develop antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain after the second vaccination; furthermore, rituximab was associated with a 2.28-fold increase in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, because T-cell−mediated immune response after COVID-19 vaccination was detected in 58% of rituximab-treated patients even in the absence of circulating B cells (<1%), the COVID-19 vaccine may also have sufficient efficacy in protecting rituximab-treated patients from SARS-CoV-2 infection.Distinct from the general population, a personalized vaccination strategy should be formulated to augment the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in rituximab-treated patients. First, COVID-19 vaccine should be preferably administered prior to rituximab treatment; otherwise, the rationale for the timing of the initial COVID-19 vaccine may be at least 6 months after rituximab treatment, and a longer interval usually indicates a higher seropositivity rate. Fifty-six percent of patients with IMIDs vaccinated 1 year after rituximab treatment were seropositive. Second, peripheral CD19+ and CD4+ lymphocyte counts serve as predictive markers for the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination. The RituxiVac study by Moor et al revealed that the optimal cutoffs, allowing a positive immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine, were more than 27 CD19+ cells/μL and more than 653 CD4+ cells/μL in rituximab-treated patients. Third, a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine should be recommended to rituximab-treated patients to aid in the generation of an immune response. Kant et al found that a third/booster dose could give a positive response in 7 of 15 patients at 1 month after rituximab treatment. Fourth, heterologous messenger RNA (mRNA)/vector vaccination regimens should be attempted in rituximab-treated patients because its better response has been confirmed by several recent studies in healthy individuals as compared with homologous mRNA/mRNA or vector/vector regimens. Simon et al administered a third dose of vaccine to 66 patients with IMIDs who did not respond to 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine and showed that patients receiving the heterologous mRNA/vector regimens exhibited a 15% increase in seropositivity rate, relative to those maintaining the homologous mRNA/mRNA regimens (55% vs 40%).In addition, the latest vaccine recommendations and guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended that the patients with IMIDs who were treated by the other immunosuppressive agents should receive the third dose at or more than 28 days after the completion of their 2-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccine series (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html#considerations-covid19-vax-immunocopromised).
Authors: David Simon; Koray Tascilar; Filippo Fagni; Katja Schmidt; Gerhard Krönke; Arnd Kleyer; Andreas Ramming; Verena Schoenau; Daniela Bohr; Johannes Knitza; Thomas Harrer; Karin Manger; Bernhard Manger; Georg Schett Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 27.973
Authors: Matthias B Moor; Franziska Suter-Riniker; Michael P Horn; Daniel Aeberli; Jennifer Amsler; Burkhard Möller; Linet M Njue; Cesare Medri; Anne Angelillo-Scherrer; Luca Borradori; Susanne Radonjic-Hoesli; S Morteza Seyed Jafari; Andrew Chan; Robert Hoepner; Vera Ulrike Bacher; Laila-Yasmin Mani; Joseena Mariam Iype; Cédric Hirzel; Britta Maurer; Daniel Sidler Journal: Lancet Rheumatol Date: 2021-09-07
Authors: Daniel Mrak; Selma Tobudic; Maximilian Koblischke; Marianne Graninger; Helga Radner; Daniela Sieghart; Philipp Hofer; Thomas Perkmann; Helmuth Haslacher; Renate Thalhammer; Stefan Winkler; Stephan Blüml; Karin Stiasny; Judith H Aberle; Josef S Smolen; Leonhard X Heinz; Daniel Aletaha; Michael Bonelli Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Vartan Pahalyants; William S Murphy; Nikolai Klebanov; Chenyue Lu; Nicholas Theodosakis; R Monina Klevens; Hossein Estir; Evelyn Lilly; Maryam Asgari; Yevgeniy R Semenov Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Vartan Pahalyants; William S Murphy; Nikolai Klebanov; Chen Lu; Nicholas Theodosakis; Monina R Klevens; Hossein Estiri; Evelyn Lilly; Maryam Asgari; Yevgeniy R Semenov Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 15.487