BACKGROUND: The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and 12-item Patient Reported Outcomes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS-PRO) instrument are validated patient-reported outcomes measures in CRS. In this study we assess the correlation of these with type 2 (T2) biomarkers before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). METHODS: Middle meatal mucus data were collected and the SNOT-22 and CRS-PRO were administered to 123 patients (71 CRS without nasal polyps [CRSsNP], 52 CRS with nasal polyps [CRSwNP]) with CRS before and 6 to 12 months after undergoing ESS. Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were measured using a multiplexed bead assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay. Pre- and post-ESS SNOT-22 and CRS-PRO were compared with T2 biomarkers. RESULTS: Before ESS neither PROM correlated with any biomarker. After ESS, CRS-PRO showed a correlation with 2 mediators (IL-5 and IL-13: p = 0.012 and 0.003, respectively) compared with none for the SNOT-22. For CRSwNP patients, pre-ESS CRS-PRO and SNOT-22 correlated with IL-4 (p = 0.04 for both). However, after ESS, CRS-PRO correlated with 3 biomarkers (IL-5, IL-13, and ECP: p = 0.02, 0.024, and 0.04, respectively) and SNOT-22 with 2 biomarkers (IL-5 and IL-13: p = 0.038 and 0.02, respectively). There were no significant relationships between any of the T2 biomarkers pre- or post-ESS among patients with CRSsNP. Exploratory analyses of the subdomains showed the SNOT-22 rhinologic and CRS-PRO rhinopsychologic subdomains correlated better with the T2 biomarkers. On individual item analysis, IL-13 correlated significantly post-ESS with 8 of 12 items on the CRS-PRO vs 6 of 22 items on the SNOT-22. CONCLUSION: The CRS-PRO total score showed a significant correlation with T2 biomarkers especially when assessed post-ESS and among CRSwNP patients.
BACKGROUND: The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and 12-item Patient Reported Outcomes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS-PRO) instrument are validated patient-reported outcomes measures in CRS. In this study we assess the correlation of these with type 2 (T2) biomarkers before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). METHODS: Middle meatal mucus data were collected and the SNOT-22 and CRS-PRO were administered to 123 patients (71 CRS without nasal polyps [CRSsNP], 52 CRS with nasal polyps [CRSwNP]) with CRS before and 6 to 12 months after undergoing ESS. Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were measured using a multiplexed bead assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay. Pre- and post-ESS SNOT-22 and CRS-PRO were compared with T2 biomarkers. RESULTS: Before ESS neither PROM correlated with any biomarker. After ESS, CRS-PRO showed a correlation with 2 mediators (IL-5 and IL-13: p = 0.012 and 0.003, respectively) compared with none for the SNOT-22. For CRSwNP patients, pre-ESS CRS-PRO and SNOT-22 correlated with IL-4 (p = 0.04 for both). However, after ESS, CRS-PRO correlated with 3 biomarkers (IL-5, IL-13, and ECP: p = 0.02, 0.024, and 0.04, respectively) and SNOT-22 with 2 biomarkers (IL-5 and IL-13: p = 0.038 and 0.02, respectively). There were no significant relationships between any of the T2 biomarkers pre- or post-ESS among patients with CRSsNP. Exploratory analyses of the subdomains showed the SNOT-22 rhinologic and CRS-PRO rhinopsychologic subdomains correlated better with the T2 biomarkers. On individual item analysis, IL-13 correlated significantly post-ESS with 8 of 12 items on the CRS-PRO vs 6 of 22 items on the SNOT-22. CONCLUSION: The CRS-PRO total score showed a significant correlation with T2 biomarkers especially when assessed post-ESS and among CRSwNP patients.
Authors: Naweed I Chowdhury; Rakesh K Chandra; Ping Li; Kim Ely; Justin H Turner Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Whitney W Stevens; Anju T Peters; Bruce K Tan; Aiko I Klingler; Julie A Poposki; Kathryn E Hulse; Leslie C Grammer; Kevin C Welch; Stephanie S Smith; David B Conley; Robert C Kern; Robert P Schleimer; Atsushi Kato Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2019-05-22
Authors: Claus Bachert; Joseph K Han; Martin Desrosiers; Peter W Hellings; Nikhil Amin; Stella E Lee; Joaquim Mullol; Leon S Greos; John V Bosso; Tanya M Laidlaw; Anders U Cervin; Jorge F Maspero; Claire Hopkins; Heidi Olze; G Walter Canonica; Pierluigi Paggiaro; Seong H Cho; Wytske J Fokkens; Shigeharu Fujieda; Mei Zhang; Xin Lu; Chunpeng Fan; Steven Draikiwicz; Siddhesh A Kamat; Asif Khan; Gianluca Pirozzi; Naimish Patel; Neil M H Graham; Marcella Ruddy; Heribert Staudinger; David Weinreich; Neil Stahl; George D Yancopoulos; Leda P Mannent Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Karon F Cook; Sally E Jensen; Benjamin D Schalet; Jennifer L Beaumont; Dagmar Amtmann; Susan Czajkowski; Darren A Dewalt; James F Fries; Paul A Pilkonis; Bryce B Reeve; Arthur A Stone; Kevin P Weinfurt; David Cella Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Mary E Keir; Alexis Scherl; Rui Zhao; Gert de Hertogh; William A Faubion; Timothy T Lu Journal: Gut Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Saied Ghadersohi; Caroline P E Price; Sally E Jensen; Jennifer L Beaumont; Robert C Kern; David B Conley; Kevin C Welch; Anju T Peters; Leslie C Grammer; Whitney W Stevens; Alexis M Calice; Elizabeth Stanton; Marisa K VanderMeeden; Robert P Schleimer; Bruce K Tan Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2020-05-04