Olive S Eckstein1, Carl E Allen1, P Mickey Williams2, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri3, David R Patton4, Brent Coffey4, Joel M Reid5, Jin Piao6, Lauren Saguilig7, Todd A Alonzo6, Stacey L Berg1, Nilsa C Ramirez8, Alok Jaju9, Joyce Mhlanga10, Elizabeth Fox11, Douglas S Hawkins12, Margaret M Mooney13, Naoko Takebe13, James V Tricoli14, Katherine A Janeway15, Nita L Seibel13, D Williams Parsons1. 1. Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 2. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD. 3. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 4. Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD. 5. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 6. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 7. Children's Oncology Group Statistical Center, Monrovia, CA. 8. Biopathology Center, Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. 9. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL. 10. Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. 11. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. 12. Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 13. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 14. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. 15. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH trial assigns patients age 1-21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase II studies of molecularly targeted therapies on the basis of detection of predefined genetic alterations. Patients with tumors harboring mutations or fusions driving activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway were treated with the MEK inhibitor selumetinib. METHODS: Patients received selumetinib twice daily for 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate; secondary end points included progression-free survival and tolerability of selumetinib. RESULTS: Twenty patients (median age: 14 years) were treated. All were evaluable for response and toxicities. The most frequent diagnoses were high-grade glioma (HGG; n = 7) and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 7). Twenty-one actionable mutations were detected: hotspot mutations in KRAS (n = 8), NRAS (n = 3), and HRAS (n = 1), inactivating mutations in NF1 (n = 7), and BRAF V600E (n = 2). No objective responses were observed. Three patients had a best response of stable disease including two patients with HGG (NF1 mutation, six cycles; KRAS mutation, 12 cycles). Six-month progression-free survival was 15% (95% CI, 4 to 34). Five patients (25%) experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event that was possibly or probably attributable to study drug. CONCLUSION: A national histology-agnostic molecular screening strategy was effective at identifying children and young adults eligible for treatment with selumetinib in the first Pediatric MATCH treatment arm to be completed. MEK inhibitors have demonstrated promising responses in some pediatric tumors (eg, low-grade glioma and plexiform neurofibroma). However, selumetinib in this cohort with treatment-refractory tumors harboring MAPK alterations demonstrated limited efficacy, indicating that pathway mutation status alone is insufficient to predict response to selumetinib monotherapy for pediatric cancers.
PURPOSE: The NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH trial assigns patients age 1-21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase II studies of molecularly targeted therapies on the basis of detection of predefined genetic alterations. Patients with tumors harboring mutations or fusions driving activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway were treated with the MEK inhibitor selumetinib. METHODS: Patients received selumetinib twice daily for 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate; secondary end points included progression-free survival and tolerability of selumetinib. RESULTS: Twenty patients (median age: 14 years) were treated. All were evaluable for response and toxicities. The most frequent diagnoses were high-grade glioma (HGG; n = 7) and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 7). Twenty-one actionable mutations were detected: hotspot mutations in KRAS (n = 8), NRAS (n = 3), and HRAS (n = 1), inactivating mutations in NF1 (n = 7), and BRAF V600E (n = 2). No objective responses were observed. Three patients had a best response of stable disease including two patients with HGG (NF1 mutation, six cycles; KRAS mutation, 12 cycles). Six-month progression-free survival was 15% (95% CI, 4 to 34). Five patients (25%) experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event that was possibly or probably attributable to study drug. CONCLUSION: A national histology-agnostic molecular screening strategy was effective at identifying children and young adults eligible for treatment with selumetinib in the first Pediatric MATCH treatment arm to be completed. MEK inhibitors have demonstrated promising responses in some pediatric tumors (eg, low-grade glioma and plexiform neurofibroma). However, selumetinib in this cohort with treatment-refractory tumors harboring MAPK alterations demonstrated limited efficacy, indicating that pathway mutation status alone is insufficient to predict response to selumetinib monotherapy for pediatric cancers.
Authors: Jason Fangusaro; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Tina Young Poussaint; Shengjie Wu; Azra H Ligon; Neal Lindeman; Anuradha Banerjee; Roger J Packer; Lindsay B Kilburn; Stewart Goldman; Ian F Pollack; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Regina I Jakacki; Paul G Fisher; Girish Dhall; Patricia Baxter; Susan G Kreissman; Clinton F Stewart; David T W Jones; Stefan M Pfister; Gilbert Vezina; Jessica S Stern; Ashok Panigrahy; Zoltan Patay; Benita Tamrazi; Jeremy Y Jones; Sofia S Haque; David S Enterline; Soonmee Cha; Michael J Fisher; Laurence Austin Doyle; Malcolm Smith; Ira J Dunkel; Maryam Fouladi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: James S Wilmott; Peter A Johansson; Felicity Newell; Nicola Waddell; Peter Ferguson; Camelia Quek; Ann-Marie Patch; Katia Nones; Ping Shang; Antonia L Pritchard; Stephen Kazakoff; Oliver Holmes; Conrad Leonard; Scott Wood; Qinying Xu; Robyn P M Saw; Andrew J Spillane; Jonathan R Stretch; Kerwin F Shannon; Richard F Kefford; Alexander M Menzies; Georgina V Long; John F Thompson; John V Pearson; Graham J Mann; Nicholas K Hayward; Richard A Scolyer Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Carl E Allen; Theodore W Laetsch; Rajen Mody; Meredith S Irwin; Megan S Lim; Peter C Adamson; Nita L Seibel; D Williams Parsons; Y Jae Cho; Katherine Janeway Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Suzanne Leijen; Mark R Middleton; Patricia Tresca; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Veronique Dieras; Max E Scheulen; Avinash Gupta; Vanesa Lopez-Valverde; Zhi-Xin Xu; Ruediger Rueger; Jean J L Tessier; Eliezer Shochat; Steve Blotner; Valerie Meresse Naegelen; Jan H M Schellens; Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eva Dombi; Andrea Baldwin; Leigh J Marcus; Michael J Fisher; Brian Weiss; AeRang Kim; Patricia Whitcomb; Staci Martin; Lindsey E Aschbacher-Smith; Tilat A Rizvi; Jianqiang Wu; Rachel Ershler; Pamela Wolters; Janet Therrien; John Glod; Jean B Belasco; Elizabeth Schorry; Alessandra Brofferio; Amy J Starosta; Andrea Gillespie; Austin L Doyle; Nancy Ratner; Brigitte C Widemann Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Reinhard Dummer; Dirk Schadendorf; Paolo A Ascierto; Ana Arance; Caroline Dutriaux; Anna Maria Di Giacomo; Piotr Rutkowski; Michele Del Vecchio; Ralf Gutzmer; Mario Mandala; Luc Thomas; Lev Demidov; Claus Garbe; David Hogg; Gabriella Liszkay; Paola Queirolo; Ernesto Wasserman; James Ford; Marine Weill; L Andres Sirulnik; Valentine Jehl; Viviana Bozón; Georgina V Long; Keith Flaherty Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Kirk R Schultz; W Paul Bowman; Alexander Aledo; William B Slayton; Harland Sather; Meenakshi Devidas; Chenguang Wang; Stella M Davies; Paul S Gaynon; Michael Trigg; Robert Rutledge; Laura Burden; Dean Jorstad; Andrew Carroll; Nyla A Heerema; Naomi Winick; Michael J Borowitz; Stephen P Hunger; William L Carroll; Bruce Camitta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 44.544