Literature DB >> 35363457

Distal ureter and bladder cuff excision using the "Keyhole Technique" during Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy.

Luis G Medina1, Muhannad Alsyouf1, Alireza Ghoreifi1, Aref S Sayegh1, Kailyn Koh1, Wenhao Yu1, Sina Sobhani1, Antoin Douglawi1, Hooman Djaladat1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5-10% of all urothelial tumors (1). Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard treatment for high, and low-grade UTUC (2). Although the open approach has been considered the gold standard, robotic techniques have shown comparable oncological outcomes with potential advantages in terms of peri-operative morbidity (3).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a novel "Keyhole" technique for management of distal ureter and bladder cuff during robotic RNU. This technique allows the surgeon to directly visualize the ureteric orifices, delineate resection borders, and maintain oncologic principles of en-bloc excision without necessitating secondary cystotomy incision or concomitant endoscopic procedure. Descriptive demographic characteristics, surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Complications were reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, ten patients underwent robotic RNU with bladder cuff excision using the Keyhole technique (single-dock, single-position). Median age was 75 years. Eight patients underwent surgery for right-sided tumors. Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 287 min, 100 mL, and 3 days, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred, and one grade II complication occurred during the 90-day postoperative period. All patients had high-grade UTUC, being 90% pure urothelial. Bladder recurrences occurred in 30% of patients with an overall median follow-up of 11.2 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Keyhole technique for the management of distal ureter and bladder cuff during RNU represents a feasible approach with minimal 90-day complications and low bladder recurrence rate at centers of experience. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35363457      PMCID: PMC9388190          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

Review 1.  European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Marko Babjuk; Maximilian Burger; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; Eva M Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Jose L Dominguez-Escrig; Paolo Gontero; A Hugh Mostafid; Joan Palou; Benoit Peyronnet; Thomas Seisen; Viktor Soukup; Richard J Sylvester; Bas W G van Rhijn; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Radosław Piszczek; Łukasz Nowak; Wojciech Krajewski; Joanna Chorbińska; Sławomir Poletajew; Marco Moschini; Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Romuald Zdrojowy
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.