Frank Sebastian Fröschen1, Thomas Martin Randau2, Sebastian Gottfried Walter2, Franz Dally3, Dieter Christian Wirtz2, Sascha Gravius3. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. Frank.Froeschen@ukbonn.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. 3. Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Centre, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Implantation of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) with load transmission onto the remaining bone stock and reconstruction of the "center of rotation" (COR) in cases of severe periacetabular bone defects. INDICATIONS: Severe periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky type IIIA/B) with or without pelvic discontinuity after septic or aseptic loosening with inadequate load capacity of the dorsal pillar and/or large supraacetabular defects. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Acute or local infections, lack of compliance, taking into account the risks and complications: missing or limited expected postoperative functional gain, multimorbid patients with potential inoperability during the first and/or second intervention. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Lateral transgluteal or posterolateral approach while protecting neurovascular and muscular structures. Preparation of the implant site based on preoperative planning with augmentation of bone defects as far as possible. Primarily stable anchoring with 2 angle-stable pole screws in the ilium, an optional pole screw in the pubic bone for determination of COR, and stabilization screws in the iliac wing (optionally angle-stable). Use of dual mobility cup according to the soft tissue tension and intraoperative stability. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: For the first 6 weeks postoperative partial weight-bearing (20 kg), followed by a gradual increase of the load (10 kg per week). RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2018, 47 patients with a Paprosky type III defect underwent implantation of a monoflanged CMAC. Main complication was a periprosthetic joint infection with subsequent need for implant removal in 9 of 10 cases. Harris Hip Score improved from 21.1 to 61.5 points. X‑ray imaging displayed an angle of inclination of 42.3 ± 5.3°, an anteversion of 16.8 ± 6.2°, a ∆ H of 0.5 ± 0.2 mm and a ∆ V of 17.7 ± 1.1 mm according to Roessler et al.
OBJECTIVE: Implantation of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) with load transmission onto the remaining bone stock and reconstruction of the "center of rotation" (COR) in cases of severe periacetabular bone defects. INDICATIONS: Severe periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky type IIIA/B) with or without pelvic discontinuity after septic or aseptic loosening with inadequate load capacity of the dorsal pillar and/or large supraacetabular defects. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Acute or local infections, lack of compliance, taking into account the risks and complications: missing or limited expected postoperative functional gain, multimorbid patients with potential inoperability during the first and/or second intervention. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Lateral transgluteal or posterolateral approach while protecting neurovascular and muscular structures. Preparation of the implant site based on preoperative planning with augmentation of bone defects as far as possible. Primarily stable anchoring with 2 angle-stable pole screws in the ilium, an optional pole screw in the pubic bone for determination of COR, and stabilization screws in the iliac wing (optionally angle-stable). Use of dual mobility cup according to the soft tissue tension and intraoperative stability. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: For the first 6 weeks postoperative partial weight-bearing (20 kg), followed by a gradual increase of the load (10 kg per week). RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2018, 47 patients with a Paprosky type III defect underwent implantation of a monoflanged CMAC. Main complication was a periprosthetic joint infection with subsequent need for implant removal in 9 of 10 cases. Harris Hip Score improved from 21.1 to 61.5 points. X‑ray imaging displayed an angle of inclination of 42.3 ± 5.3°, an anteversion of 16.8 ± 6.2°, a ∆ H of 0.5 ± 0.2 mm and a ∆ V of 17.7 ± 1.1 mm according to Roessler et al.
Authors: Federico De Meo; Giorgio Cacciola; Vittorio Bellotti; Antongiolio Bruschetta; Pietro Cavaliere Journal: Hip Int Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Christopher W Jones; Hans Jacobs; Sarah Shumborski; Simon Talbot; Andrew Redgment; Roger Brighton; William L Walter Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: F S Fröschen; T M Randau; G T R Hischebeth; N Gravius; S Gravius; S G Walter Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: J Schmolders; S Koob; P Schepers; P H Pennekamp; S Gravius; D C Wirtz; R Placzek; A C Strauss Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Dieter Christian Wirtz; Max Jaenisch; Thiemo Antonius Osterhaus; Martin Gathen; Matthias Wimmer; Thomas Martin Randau; Frank Alexander Schildberg; Philip Peter Rössler Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 3.067