Mohammed Deputy1,2, Ailsa Hart3, Omar Faiz1,2. 1. Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK. 2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. 3. Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
We thank Mungmunpuntipantip and Wiwanitkit for their correspondence regarding our recent paper on the use of, and outcomes for, inflammatory bowel disease services in England during the Covid‐19 pandemic.
,
We agree with them that only a proportion of patients with severe inflammatory bowel disease presented during the pandemic. This is likely due to several reasons. Firstly, patients will have stayed away due to the fear of contagion. Secondly, stay at home orders and lockdowns will have deterred patients from attending hospital. A careful public health message must be crafted to ensure that those requiring urgent medical treatment still come forward for healthcare and do not stay at home. Thirdly, there was a reduction in resources to carry out procedures (hospital beds, theatre space, ventilators, etc). Departments reduced the provision of services such as endoscopy for safety reasons. Fourthly, the availability of healthcare workers diminished due to sickness, redeployment and, in some unfortunate cases, death and disability. Finally, the prioritisation of cancer patients may have reduced the availability of scant resources for the management of IBD patients requiring care. All the above considerations will have participated in the overall reduced healthcare utilisation by inflammatory bowel disease patients during the pandemic.