| Literature DB >> 35361175 |
Jinfeng He1, Bo Yuan2, Shanyu Zhou2, Shuyuan Peng2, Ye Xu1, He Cai1, Li Cheng3, Yuehua You4,5, Tao Hu6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dental visits can provide education, prevention and treatment measures for teenagers, and help to form correct oral health knowledge and attitude. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of socio-demographic factors, dental status, oral health literacy, and health-related behaviors on dental visits in early 12-year-old adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Cross-sectional study; Dental visits; Oral health; Shenzhen
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35361175 PMCID: PMC8973601 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02110-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Descriptive characteristics of the participants (N = 953)
| Variables | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 468 | 49.1 |
| Female | 485 | 50.9 |
| Hukou | ||
| Shenzhen | 227 | 23.8 |
| Non-Shenzhen | 726 | 76.2 |
| Street economy | ||
| Good | 564 | 59.2 |
| Poor | 389 | 40.8 |
| Father’s educational level | ||
| ≤ 8 years | 407 | 42.7 |
| > 8 years | 546 | 57.3 |
| Mother’s educational level | ||
| ≤ 8 years | 481 | 50.5 |
| > 8 years | 472 | 49.5 |
| Caries degree | ||
| Zero | 465 | 48.8 |
| Moderate | 370 | 38.8 |
| Severe | 118 | 12.4 |
| Gingival bleeding | ||
| No | 248 | 26.0 |
| Yes | 705 | 74.0 |
| Calculus | ||
| No | 597 | 62.6 |
| Yes | 356 | 37.4 |
| Angle class II malocclusion | ||
| No | 767 | 80.5 |
| Yes | 186 | 19.5 |
| Angle class III malocclusion | ||
| No | 730 | 76.6 |
| Yes | 223 | 23.4 |
| Anterior deep overjet | ||
| No | 371 | 38.9 |
| Yes | 582 | 61.1 |
| Toothbrushing frequency | ||
| Daily | 915 | 96.0 |
| Sometimes or never | 38 | 4.0 |
| Dental floss usage | ||
| No | 714 | 74.9 |
| Yes | 239 | 25.1 |
| Sugar intake level | ||
| High | 224 | 23.5 |
| Moderate | 606 | 63.6 |
| Low | 123 | 12.9 |
| Toothache within the last 12 months | ||
| No | 468 | 49.1 |
| Yes | 485 | 50.9 |
| Dentist visit experience | ||
| No | 263 | 27.6 |
| Yes | 690 | 72.4 |
| Knowledge-attitude level | ||
| High | 306 | 32.1 |
| Moderate | 313 | 32.8 |
| Low | 334 | 35.0 |
| Affect the OHRQoL | ||
| No | 247 | 25.9 |
| Slight | 614 | 64.4 |
| Yes | 92 | 9.7 |
Dental status in Longhua district of Shenzhen
| DMFT | Prevalence of dental caries (%) | Filling ratio (%) | Prevalence of active cariesa (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | |||||
| Hukou | |||||
| Shenzhen | 1.33 | 1.84 | 52.0 | 44.0 | 37.5 |
| Non-Shenzhen | 1.30 | 1.80 | 51.0 | 21.4 | 45.0 |
| Total | 1.31 | 1.81 | 51.2 | 26.9 | 42.2 |
aActive caries means DT > 0
Logistic regression for having dental visit experience and socio-demographic factors, dental status, oral health knowledge and attitude, and health-related behaviors
| Variables | Dentist visit experience | Univariate analyses | Multivariate analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| n (%) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 347 (36.4%) | 121 (12.7%) | 0.237 | 1.187 (0.893–1.578) | ||
| Female | 343 (36.0%) | 142 (14.9%) | 1.00 | |||
| Hukou | ||||||
| Shenzhen | 190 (19.9%) | 37 (3.9%) | ||||
| Non-Shenzhen | 500(52.5%) | 226(23.7%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Street economy | ||||||
| Good | 462 (44.7%) | 138 (14.5%) | ||||
| Poor | 264 (27.7%) | 125 (13.1%) | 1.00 | |||
| Father’s educational level | ||||||
| > 8 years | 406 (42.6%) | 140 (14.7%) | 0.118 | 1.256 (0.944–1.671) | ||
| ≤ 8 years | 284 (29.8%) | 123 (12.9%) | 1.00 | |||
| Mother’s educational level | ||||||
| > 8 years | 360 (37.8%) | 112 (11.8%) | ||||
| ≤ 8 years | 330 (34.6%) | 151 (15.8%) | 1.00 | |||
| Caries degree | ||||||
| Severe | 100 (10.5%) | 18 (1.9%) | ||||
| Moderate | 277 (29.1%) | 93 (9.8%) | ||||
| Zero | 313 (32.8%) | 152 (15.9%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Gingival bleeding | ||||||
| Yes | 519 (54.5%) | 186 (19.5%) | 0.158 | 1.256 (0.915–1.725) | ||
| No | 171 (17.9%) | 77 (8.1%) | 1.00 | |||
| Calculus | ||||||
| Yes | 247 (25.9%) | 109 (11.4%) | 0.108 | 0.788 (0.589–1.053) | ||
| No | 443 (46.5%) | 154 (16.2%) | 1.00 | |||
| Angle class II malocclusion | ||||||
| Yes | 148 (15.5%) | 38 (4.0%) | ||||
| No | 542 (56.9%) | 225 (23.6%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Angle class III malocclusion | ||||||
| Yes | 150 (15.7%) | 73 (7.7%) | ||||
| No | 540 (56.7%) | 190 (19.9%) | 1.00 | |||
| Anterior deep overjet | ||||||
| Yes | 433 (45.4%) | 149 (15.6%) | 0.085 | 1.289 (0.966–1.720) | ||
| No | 257 (27.0%) | 114 (12.0%) | 1.00 | |||
| Toothbrushing frequency | ||||||
| Sometimes or never | 18 (1.9%) | 20 (2.1%) | ||||
| Daily | 672 (70.5%) | 243 (25.5%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Dental floss usage | ||||||
| Yes | 196 (20.6%) | 43 (4.5%) | ||||
| No | 494 (51.8%) | 220 (23.1%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Sugar intake level | ||||||
| High | 148 (15.5%) | 76 (8.0%) | 0.790 | 0.938 (0.588–1.498) | ||
| Moderate | 459 (48.2%) | 147 (15.4%) | 0.057 | 1.505 (0.988–2.291) | ||
| Low | 83 (8.7%) | 40 (4.2%) | 1.00 | |||
| Toothache within the last 12 months | ||||||
| Yes | 371 (38.9%) | 114 (12.0%) | ||||
| No | 319 (33.5%) | 149 (15.6%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Knowledge-attitude level | ||||||
| High | 234 (24.6%) | 72 (7.6%) | ||||
| Moderate | 233 (24.4%) | 80 (8.4%) | ||||
| Low | 223 (23.4%) | 111 (11.6%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Affect the OHRQoL | ||||||
| Yes | 68 (7.1%) | 24 (2.5%) | 0.264 | 1.357 (0.794–1.891) | ||
| Slight | 455 (47.7%) | 159 (16.7%) | 0.055 | 1.371 (0.994–2.320) | ||
| No | 167 (17.5%) | 80 (8.4%) | 1.00 | |||
Bold values denotes the risk predictors with p value < 0.05 and their respective OR (95% CI)