| Literature DB >> 35360694 |
Qiao Wang1, Wanying Song1, Yimei Tian1, Peihao Hu1, Xin Liu1, Lin Xu1, Zhiyong Gong1.
Abstract
Perchlorate, commonly available in drinking water and food, acts on the iodine uptake by the thyroid affecting lipid metabolism. High-fat diets leading to various health problems continually raise public concern. In the present study, liver lipid metabolism profiles and metabolic pathways were investigated in C57BL/6J mice chronically exposed to perchlorate using targeted metabolomics. Mice were fed a high-fat diet and treated orally with perchlorate at 0.1 mg/kg bw (body weight), 1 mg/kg bw and 10 mg/kg bw daily for 12 weeks. Perchlorate induced disorders of lipid metabolism in vivo and hepatic lipid accumulation confirmed by serum biochemical parameters and histopathological examination. There were 34 kinds of lipid in liver detected by UHPLC-MS/MS and key metabolites were identified by multivariate statistical analysis evaluated with VIP > 1, p-value < 0.05, fold change > 1.2 or < 0.8. Perchlorate low, medium and high dose groups were identified with 11, 7 and 8 significantly altered lipid metabolites compared to the control group, respectively. The results of the metabolic pathway analysis revealed that the differential metabolites classified into different experimental groups contribute to the glycerophospholipid metabolic pathway. These findings provide insights into the effects of perchlorate on lipid metabolism during long-term exposure to high-fat diets and contribute to the evaluation of perchlorate liver toxic mechanisms and health effects.Entities:
Keywords: C57BL/6J mice; high-fat diet; lipid metabolism; perchlorate; targeted lipidomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35360694 PMCID: PMC8964020 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.837601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Changes of body weights of the mice during the experiment (A), liver coefficient (B) (*P < 0.05, n = 6).
Levels of serum biochemistry parameters in mice from experiment and control groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | 26.75 ± 4.50 | 26.00 ± 1.63 | 25.75 ± 1.89 | 28.75 ± 2.06 |
| ALT (U/L) | 11.00 ± 0.82 | 10.50 ± 2.08 | 11.00 ± 3.16 | 11.50 ± 1.73 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 4.94 ± 1.77 | 5.19 ± 0.98 | 5.96 ± 2.32 | 6.47 ± 1.10 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 1.19 ± 0.11 | 1.284 ± 0.04 | 1.42 ± 0.13 | 1.464 ± 0.23 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.17 ± 0.23 |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | 1.21 ± 0.10 | 1.27 ± 0.04 | 1.35 ± 0.12 | 1.49 ± 0.25 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.03 |
Mean ± standard deviation values in the same row for each parameters followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Histopathological analysis of liver (HE, 400×). (A) CG, (B) LG, (C) MG, and (D) HG.
Figure 3The content of phospholipids (A) and sphingolipids and triglyceride (B) in the liver of mice in high-dose group (HG), middle-dose group (MG), low-dose group (LG) and control group (CG) (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with the control group, n = 6).
Potential differential metabolites identified significantly different in liver in each group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG | PC (18:1/14:1) | 1.35 | 0.000 | 0.63 | Down |
| PE (18:0/18:2) | 1.31 | 0.000 | 0.74 | Down | |
| TAG (16:0/18:2/18:3) | 1.30 | 0.000 | 0.60 | Down | |
| TAG (16:1/18:3/18:1) | 1.27 | 0.000 | 0.58 | Down | |
| TAG (16:0/20:3/16:1) | 1.24 | 0.002 | 0.63 | Down | |
| TAG (18:0/18:3/18:2) | 1.20 | 0.004 | 0.74 | Down | |
| TAG (18:0/18:2/18:2) | 1.17 | 0.014 | 0.76 | Down | |
| TAG (18:1/18:3/18:1) | 1.16 | 0.002 | 0.70 | Down | |
| TAG (16:0/18:2/16:0) | 1.16 | 0.001 | 0.57 | Down | |
| TAG (16:1/18:0/18:1) | 1.09 | 0.015 | 0.71 | Down | |
| TAG (18:0/18:3/18:1) | 1.07 | 0.005 | 0.71 | Down | |
| MG | LPC (20:4/0:0) | 1.60 | 0.000 | 0.62 | Down |
| LPC (20:0/0:0) | 1.58 | 0.000 | 0.74 | Down | |
| PC (3:0/16:0) | 1.44 | 0.001 | 0.67 | Down | |
| TAG (16:0/18:2/18:3) | 1.21 | 0.007 | 0.77 | Down | |
| PC (14:0/14:0) | 1.18 | 0.005 | 0.60 | Down | |
| TAG (18:0/18:3/18:1) | 1.15 | 0.035 | 0.79 | Down | |
| TAG (18:0/18:1/18:4) | 1.11 | 0.006 | 0.78 | Down | |
| HG | LPC (20:0/0:0) | 1.60 | 0.000 | 0.54 | Down |
| PE (20:3/15:0) | 1.57 | 0.000 | 0.75 | Down | |
| PC (3:0/16:0) | 1.54 | 0.000 | 0.39 | Down | |
| SM (d15:3/24:0) | 1.44 | 0.000 | 0.77 | Down | |
| PG (18:0/18:1) | 1.43 | 0.001 | 1.27 | Up | |
| LPC (20:1/0:0) | 1.41 | 0.000 | 0.79 | Down | |
| PC (6:0/13:1) | 1.29 | 0.001 | 0.59 | Down | |
| LPC (20:4/0:0) | 1.20 | 0.000 | 0.74 | Down |
Figure 4Pathway analysis of differential lipid metabolites in liver from the (A) LG group, (B) MG group, and (C) HG group.