| Literature DB >> 35360659 |
Jinchuan Zhao1, Xin Gao1, Liangyou Zhao2, Yiqing Wang1, Jingbo Zhang1, Shumin Liu3.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease characterized by a disorder of the dopaminergic system in the midbrain, causing classical PD motor symptoms. The therapeutic effect of cannabidiol (CBD) on PD has been a research frontier in recent years. However, the pathogenesis of PD and the therapeutic mechanism of cannabinoid remain unclear. To further study the causes of PD and the effect of CBD on PD, we exposed the PD transgenic mouse model to CBD and then estimated the motorial and postural coordination through a modified swim test. Afterwards, the mechanism was investigated via the histopathology of substantia nigra and the gut-brain metabolic analysis in the approach of UHPLC-TOF-MS. The results showed that CBD significantly improved motor deficits of PD model and protected the substantia nigra area. The metabolic function of fatty acid biosynthesis, arginine biosynthesis/metabolism, butanoate (ketone body) metabolism, β-alanine metabolism, and pantothenate/CoA biosynthesis was highlighted in the pathological and therapeutic process along the gut-brain axis. In conclusion, CBD could attenuate PD via the neuroprotective effect on the midbrain. The attenuation of the central nervous system in turn improved motor performance of PD, which might be partially induced by the metabolic interaction between the gut-brain. In view of gut-brain metabolomics, the mechanism of PD pathogenesis and the effect of CBD on PD are highly related to the biosynthesis and metabolism of energy and essential substance.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35360659 PMCID: PMC8964161 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1525113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Grading standard of CST.
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 30 | Full score for a normal individual swimming continuously in regular posture |
| 25 | Swim fluently with once short break (<2 s) |
| 20 | Swim fluently with casual short break (<2 s) |
| 15 | Swim with frequent break or floating (<2 s) |
| 10 | Swim less than half time |
| 0 | Swim not at all |
| −5 | Penalty for incoordinative posture, e.g., indolent swim or stiff tail |
| −10 | Penalty for poor posture, e.g., spiraling swim or erect tail |
| −10 | Penalty for long floating (>2 s) |
Grading of CST.
| Group | Control (C) | Model (M) | CBD (D) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before ad. | 26.25 ± 1.25 | 13.13 ± 2.30Δ | 12.50 ± 1.89Δ |
| After ad. | 26.25 ± 1.57 | 12.50 ± 2.32 | 17.50 ± 1.89 |
| Improved individuals (proportion) | 1 (12.5%) | 2 (25%) | 4 (50%) |
ΔP < 0.001 significant different from group C; P < 0.05 significantly different from the same group before the administration (ad.).
Figure 1Typical performance of the mice in CST.
Figure 2Representative histopathological microphotographs of the substantia nigra area in the midbrain (HE-staining). Yellow arrows indicate obviously fading substantia nigra areas compared twith the control group, and red arrows indicate typical Lewy bodies.
Focused cerebral and fecal DEMs of each paired group comparison.
| DEMs set | bM | bD | fM | fD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call-back pattern intergroup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
↑ upregulated, ↓ downregulated, compared with the corresponding contrast group. bM: brain samples, group M versus C; bD: brain samples, group D versus M; fM: feces samples, group M versus C; fD: feces samples, group D versus M. The DEMs in form of bold within a certain group are highly correlated in a common regulation profile according to the KEGG pathway based clustering analysis.
Figure 3Venn diagram of the four DEMs sets.
Significantly enriched terms in the DEMs bioinformatics analysis and the corresponding involved DEMs.
| DEMs set | Analysis (database) | Terms (≥2 DEMs) | Involved metabolites | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bM | Enrichment/pathway (SMPDB & KEGG) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
| bD | Pathway (KEGG) |
|
| |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 1-Acyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; sn-Glycero-3-phosphocholine |
| ||
| Enrichment/pathway (KEGG/SMPDB) |
|
|
| |
| fM | Enrichment/pathway (KEGG) |
|
|
|
| fD | Pathway (SMPDB/KEGG) |
|
| |
| Enrichment (human feces) | Obesity |
|
| |
| Enrichment (SMPDB/KEGG) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
bM: brain samples, group M versus C; bD: brain samples, group D versus M; fM: feces samples, group M versus C; fD: feces samples, group D versus M. The focused DEMs and the corresponding significant terms were in form of bold. Significance (Sig.): P < 0.001; P < 0.01; P < 0.05.
Figure 4Schematic for focused DEMs and corresponding functionality and pathways. Bold DEMs were highly correlated in a common regulation profile within a certain DEMs set. Red parts stand for PD pathogenesis, and blue parts stand for variation triggered by CBD.