| Literature DB >> 35360475 |
Jing Wang1, Yang Wang2, Ping Pang3, Xiaomeng Jia4, Xu Yan1, Zhaohui Lv5.
Abstract
With the rapid development of IoT technology, it is a new trend to combine edge computing with smart medicine in order to better develop modern medicine, avoid the crisis of information "sibling," and meet the requirements of timeliness and computational performance of the massive data generated by edge devices. However, edge computing is somewhat open and prone to security risks, so the security and privacy protection of edge computing systems for smart healthcare is receiving increasing attention. The two groups were compared before and after treatment for blood glucose, blood lipids, blood pressure, renal function, serum advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), serum oxidative stress indicators, and levels of cAMP/PKA signalling pathway-related proteins in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The results of this study show that the reduction of AGEs, the improvement of oxidative stress, and the regulation of the cAMP/PKA signalling pathway may be associated with a protective effect against early DKD. By introducing the edge computing system and its architecture for smart healthcare, we describe the security risks encountered by smart healthcare in edge computing, introduce the solutions proposed by some scholars to address the security risks, and finally summarize the security protection framework and discuss the specific solutions for security and privacy protection under this framework, which will provide some help for the credible research of smart healthcare edge computing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35360475 PMCID: PMC8964200 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6504006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Edge computing architecture for smart healthcare.
Figure 2Sources of privacy and security concerns.
Figure 3Core framework for research on privacy security protection.
Comparison of clinical information between the two groups of patients.
| Group | Age (years) | Gender ( | Body mass index (kg/m2) | Diabetes course (year) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female sex | ||||
| Control group | 56.42±11.85 | 24 | 16 | 26.67±2.73 | 9.47±3.56 |
| Observation group | 55.68±12.21 | 22 | 18 | 27.39±2.81 | 8.95±4.17 |
|
| 0.275 | 0.205 | 1.162 | 0.6 | |
|
| 0.785 | 0.651 | 0.252 | 0.552 | |
Figure 4Measurement of PKA/CREB signalling pathway-related proteins in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before and after treatment in two groups of patients.
Figure 5Diabetes clustering for different edge computing.
Figure 6Computational efficiency of different algorithms for different nodes.