| Literature DB >> 35360308 |
Jingjing Qian1, Ning Wang1, Wenxu Ren2, Rufan Zhang3, Xiyao Hong4, Lingyue Chen2, Kaijing Zhang1, Yingjie Shu1, Nengbing Hu1, Yuchen Yang2.
Abstract
Dwarfed stature is a desired trait for modern orchard production systems. One effective strategy for dwarfing cultivation is exogenously applying plant growth retardants (PGRs) to plants. However, for many economic fruit trees, the current knowledge on the regulatory mechanisms underlying the dwarfing effect of PGRs is limited, which largely restricts the agricultural application of PGRs. In this study, we exogenously applied three kinds of PGRs [paclobutrazol, daminozide (B9), and mannitol] to the seedlings of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) and performed comparative transcriptome analysis to elucidate the molecular features of PGR-induced dwarfing in pomegranates. Our results showed that all the three PGRs could significantly suppress plant growth of pomegranate. The inhibition of auxin biosynthetic processes, as well as auxin-mediated shoot development, may be considered as the main reason for the dwarfing. Besides that, different PGRs were also found to induce dwarfing via specific mechanisms, for example, cellular response to strigolactone was particularly suppressed by the application of paclobutrazol, while the level of carbohydrate homeostasis and metabolism were downregulated in conditions of either B9 or mannitol treatments. Furthermore, exogenous PGR application was supposed to cause adverse impacts on the normal physiological process of pomegranate seedlings, which may bring extra burden to pomegranate plants. These novel findings unveiled the genetic basis underlying the dwarfing in pomegranates, which provides deeper insights into PGR-mediated dwarfing cultivation of pomegranates.Entities:
Keywords: adverse impact; auxin biosynthesis; dwarfing; plant growth retardant; pomegranates
Year: 2022 PMID: 35360308 PMCID: PMC8961278 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.866193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Plant height and antioxidative enzyme activities of pomegranate seedlings treated with paclobutrazol, B9, and mannitol for 90 days. (A) Height of seedlings of CK (untreated) or treated with three PGRs of different concentrations; (B) an image showing CK and treated seedlings; (C) SOD activity; (D) POD activity. Values are mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 2Correlation between the log-scaled expression level changes (treatment group vs CK) inferred from RNA-seq (x-axis) and of qPCR (y-axis). Data from different treatment groups (paclobutrazol, B9, and mannitol) are highlighted in different colors. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and p are shown in the plot.
FIGURE 3Overview for the downregulated DEGs in pomegranates treated with paclobutrazol. (A) Overlap and functional enrichment analysis of DEGs downregulated under 6 mg/L paclobutrazol over 8 mg/L paclobutrazol. (B) Heatmap showing gene expression profile of the downregulated DEGs related to IAA biosynthetic and signaling pathways in conditions of CK, and 6 and 8 mg/L paclobutrazol treatments.
FIGURE 4Overlap and functional enrichment analysis of DEGs downregulated under the treatments of paclobutrazol and B9. Different colors represent feature-enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways for different categories of downregulated DEGs.
FIGURE 5Overview for the downregulated DEGs in pomegranates treated with mannitol. Functional enrichment analysis for downregulated DEGs in pomegranates under the treatment of 2.5 g/L (A) and 15 g/L mannitol (B). (C) Significant clusters of genes with a similar trend in expression across different mannitol concentrations (0, 2.5, and 15 g/L) and the representative GO terms and KEGG pathways enriched for each set of genes. For each panel, each line represents the expression change of one gene across different concentrations, and the intensity of colors represents the membership value of genes (the more red, the greater membership values; the more blue, the lesser membership values). The number of genes belonging to each cluster is shown in the parentheses after the cluster label. For each GO term or KEGG pathway, the number of genes is shown in parentheses, with the number before and after the forward-slash representing the genes exhibiting the trend and the genes from the genome background.