| Literature DB >> 35359824 |
Anirudh Sharma1, Saumya Singh2, Xin Song1, Diego Rosas Villalva1, Joel Troughton1, Daniel Corzo1, Levent Toppare3,4, Gorkem Gunbas3,4, Bob C Schroeder2, Derya Baran1.
Abstract
The choice of interfacial materials and their properties play a critical role in determining solar cell performance and stability. For compatibility with roll-to-roll printing, it is desirable to develop stable cathode interface layers (CILs) that can be processed over the photoactive layer using orthogonal solvents. In this study, an n-type naphthalene diimide core and oligo (ethylene glycol) side-chain-based conjugated polymer is reported as a universal, efficient CIL for organic and perovskite photovoltaics. Besides good thermal stability and easy processing in alcohol/water, the new CIL is found to possess electron transport properties with an electrical conductivity of 2.3 × 10-6 S cm-1, enabling its use as a CIL with a film thickness of up to ∼35(±2) nm. Utilizing the new CIL, 16% power conversion efficiency (PCE) is achieved for organic solar cells (OSCs) based on the PM6-Y6 photoactive layer (8.9% PCE for no CIL and 15.1% with state-of-the-art CIL, PDINO), and perovskite solar cells from methylammonium lead iodide yielded a PCE of 17.6%. Compared to the reference devices, the new CIL reduced trap-assisted carrier recombination and increased the built-in potential by 80 mV, simultaneously enhancing all photovoltaic parameters. Moreover, new CIL based devices had better photostability with no burn-in losses.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35359824 PMCID: PMC8944940 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Mater ISSN: 0897-4756 Impact factor: 9.811
Figure 1Chemical structures of various materials used as CILs in OSCs.
Scheme 1Synthesis of Oligo(ethylene glycol) (OEG) Side-Chain Substituted Monomer M1 and Polymer P2G
Figure 2(a) Normalized UV–vis absorption spectra of P2G in solution and thin film; (b) secondary electron cutoff of the UP spectra depicting the change in the work function of P2G modified ITO, Ag, and Au electrodes; (c) schematic showing the device structure and the energy levels of the state-of-the-art donor (PM6), acceptor (Y6), and P2G, measured using UPS and LE-IPES (refer to SI for details).
Photovoltaic Parameters of Conventional Devices Based on PTB7-Th:IEICO-4F and PM6:Y6 Active Layer under AM 1.5 G Illumination, 100 mW cm–2a
| BHJ | CIL | thickness [nm] | integrated | FF [%] | PCE [%] | av. PCE [%] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTB7-Th: IEICO-4F | P2G | ∼1–3 | 22.9 | 22.9 | 0.70 | 60.2 | 9.8 | 9.7 |
| 5 | 23.6 | 23.0 | 0.71 | 62.2 | 10.5 | 10.5 | ||
| 15 | 22.0 | 21.9 | 0.71 | 62.4 | 9.9 | 9.6 | ||
| 35 | 20.9 | 21.0 | 0.71 | 62.7 | 9.3 | 9.3 | ||
| PM6:Y6 | P2G | 5 | 25.2 | 24.4 | 0.85 | 74.8 | 16.0 | 15.7 |
| PDINO | 8 | 24.7 | 24.0 | 0.84 | 72.9 | 15.1 | 14.8 |
Integrated Jsc was within a 5% deviation of the Jsc value acquired from J–V curves. Average values calculated over 10 devices.
Figure 3Chemical structure of (a) PM6 and (b) Y6, (c) J-V, and (d) EQE curves of the best-performing PM6-Y6 devices using a PDINO and P2G CIL.
Figure 4Light intensity-dependent (a) Jsc and (b) Voc measurements. (c) Mott–Schottky characteristics [C2– (V)] and (d) normalized TPC plots of PM6:Y6 based solar cells with PDINO and P2G CILs. Inset shows the zoomed in view of the change in the rise and fall time of the photocurrent.
Figure 5(a) Device structure and (b) J–V curves of hybrid perovskite solar cells fabricated with and without P2G, (c) box plots showing the PCE along with the standard deviation across six devices with and without P2G, (d) EQE curves of best-performing devices with and without the P2G CIL.