| Literature DB >> 35359823 |
Chao Jia1, Zhe Xu1, Dianfeng Luo1, Hengxue Xiang1, Meifang Zhu1.
Abstract
Flexible ceramic fibers (FCFs) have been developed for various advanced applications due to their superior mechanical flexibility, high temperature resistance, and excellent chemical stability. In this article, we present an overview on the recent progress of FCFs in terms of materials, fabrication methods, and applications. We begin with a brief introduction to FCFs and the materials for preparation of FCFs. After that, various methods for preparation of FCFs are discussed, including centrifugal spinning, electrospinning, solution blow spinning, self-assembly, chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, and polymer conversion. Recent applications of FCFs in various fields are further illustrated in detail, including thermal insulation, air filtration, water treatment, sound absorption, electromagnetic wave absorption, battery separator, catalytic application, among others. Finally, some perspectives on the future directions and opportunities for the preparation and application of FCFs are highlighted. We envision that this review will provide readers with some meaningful guidance on the preparation of FCFs and inspire them to explore more potential applications. © Donghua University, Shanghai, China 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Applications; Ceramic fibers; Flexibility; Preparation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35359823 PMCID: PMC8831880 DOI: 10.1007/s42765-022-00133-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Fiber Mater ISSN: 2524-7921
Fig. 1Development status of ceramic fiber materials. a Number of literatures published annually during the period of 2011–2020 on the subject of “ceramic fiber” retrieved from the core database of Web of Science. b Number of publications for the top 10 countries in the last 10 years. c Research progress of FCFs in terms of materials, preparation methods and applications
Materials and calcination conditions for preparation of FCFs
| Ceramic fibers | Precursors | Polymers | Solvents | Additives | Calcination conditions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | TEOS | PVA | H2O | H3PO4 | 5 °C min−1, 600–1200 °C, in air | [ |
| TEOS | PVA | H2O | Oxalic acid | 5 °C min−1, 800 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| TEOS | PVP | Ethanol | H2O | 6 °C min−1, 550 °C for 1 h, in air | [ | |
| TEOS | PVP | Ethanol | HCl, H2O | 850 °C, 6 h, in air | [ | |
| TEOS | PVP | Ethanol | HCl, H2O | 2 °C min−1, 300, 600 and 900 °C, in air | [ | |
| TEOS | / | Ethanol | HCl, H2O | 10 °C min−1, 250–1000 °C for 3 h, in air | [ | |
| Al2O3 | Aluminium acetate | PVP | Ethanol | Acetic acid | 20 °C min−1, 1000 °C for 2 h, in air | [ |
| Aluminum powder | PEO | H2O | Formic acid, acetic acid | 1 °C min−1, 600 °C for 2 h, 5 °C min−1, 700–1000 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| Al(NO3)3·9H2O, AlCl3·6H2O, aluminum isopropoxide, aluminum powder | PEO | Nitric acid, H2O | Pluronic P123 | 10 °C min−1, 450 °C for 12 h/700–1100 °C for 0.5 h, in air | [ | |
| AlCl3·6H2O, aluminum powder | PVA | H2O | Silica sol | 4 °C min−1, 600–1100 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| AlCl3·6H2O, aluminum powder | / | H2O | Silica sol | 4 °C min−1, 400–1200 °C for 4 h, in air | [ | |
| Al(NO3)3·9H2O, aluminum isopropoxide | PVA, PVB, PVP | H2O | / | 5 °C min−1, 900 °C for 1 h, in air | [ | |
| Aluminum isopropoxide | PVA | H2O | Nitric acid | 3 °C min−1, 650 °C/1200 °C for 3 h, in air | [ | |
| ZrO2 | ZrOCl2·8H2O | / | H2O | Hydrogen peroxide, Y(NO3)3·6H2O, acetic acid | 1 °C min−1, 800 °C for 1 h, 5 °C min−1, 1200 °C for 1 h, in air | [ |
| Zirconium acetate | PVP | Acetic acid | / | 200–1000 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| ZrOCl2·8H2O | PVP | H2O | Y(NO3)3·6H2O, citrate, acetate | 600–1300 °C, in air | [ | |
| Zirconium acetate hydroxide | PAN | DMF | Y(NO3)3·6H2O | 5 °C min−1, 280 °C for 1 h, 1 °C min−1, 800 °C for 3 h, in air | [ | |
| ZrOCl2·8H2O | PVP | Ethanol, H2O | / | 2 °C min−1, 800 °C for 200 min, in air | [ | |
| ZrOCl2·8H2O | / | H2O2, H2O | YCl3·6H2O | 1.2–3 °C min−1, 1300 °C for 3 h, in steam atmosphere | [ | |
| Zirconium n-propoxide | PVP | Ethanol | Y(NO3)3·6H2O, fluorinated surfactant, acetylacetone | 2 °C min−1, 800 °C for 200 min, in air | [ | |
| TiO2 | Titanium (IV) isopropoxide | PVP | Ethanol, acetic acid | Zirconium acetate | 2 °C min−1, 600 °C for 1 h, in air | [ |
| Tetrabutyl titanate | PVP | Ethanol, acetic acid, H2O | Y(NO3)3·6H2O | 2 °C min−1, 550 °C for 2 h, in N2 atmosphere | [ | |
| Titanium (IV) isopropoxide | PVP/PVAc/PLA | Ethanol, acetic acid, dimethyl carbonate | / | 5 °C min−1, 500–700 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| Titanium isopropoxide | PVP | Acetic acid, ethanol | Pluronic P123/F127 | 3–5 °C min−1, 500–700 °C for 3 h, in air | [ | |
| Titanium (IV) isopropoxide | PVC/PVP | THF, HCl/ethanol, acetic acid | / | 600 °C/700 °C, in air | [ | |
| Tetrabutyl titanate | PVP | Ethanol, acetic acid | / | 2 °C min−1, 450 °C for 200 min, in air | [ | |
| Ti(OiPr)4-isopropanol | PVA fiber template | / | / | 600 °C, in air | [ | |
| Titanium tetrachloride | Nanocellulose template | H2O | / | 450 °C for 8 h, in air | [ | |
| Titanium tetrachloride, acetylacetone, triethylamine | / | H2O, methanol, THF | TEOS | 1.5 °C min−1, 400–900 °C for 2 h, in steam atmosphere | [ | |
| Titanium tetrabutoxide | / | H2O, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl acetoacetate, THF | TEOS | 500–900 °C, in steam atmosphere | [ | |
| ZnO | Zinc acetate dihydrate | PVP | DMF | / | 400–600 °C for 2 h, in air | [ |
| Zn(NO3)2·6H2O | PVP | Ethanol, H2O | AgNO3 | 1 °C min−1, 520 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| Zinc acetate | PVP | Ethanol | / | 700 °C | [ | |
| Zinc acetate | PVA | H2O | Ni(NO3)2 | 650 °C for 3 h | [ | |
| Zinc acetate dihydrate | PVC/PVP | THF, HCl/ ethanol, DMF | / | 600 °C/700 °C | [ | |
| Zn(NO3)2 | PVP | H2O, ethanol | / | 6 °C min−1, 550 °C for 1 h, in air | [ | |
| Mullite | Aluminum trisec-butoxide, polyhydromethylsiloxane | PVP | Isopropanol, DMF, ethylacetoacetate | / | 2 °C min−1, 800–1500 °C, in air | [ |
| Aluminium isopropoxide, Al(NO3)3·9H2O, TEOS | PVB | H2O, ethanol | / | 800–1400 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| Aluminum acetate, colloidal silica | PVP | H2O, ethanol | Nitric acid, boric acid | 5 °C min−1, 800 °C for 1 h, 800–1200 °C for 1 h, in air | [ | |
| Aluminum trisec-butoxide, polymethylsiloxane | PVP | Ethylacetoacetate, isopropanol | / | 2 °C min−1, 800 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| Aluminum acetate, TEOS | PVP | H2O, ethanol | Boric acid | 5 °C min−1, 800 °C for 1 h, 1000 °C for 1 h, in air | [ | |
| TEOS, Al(NO3)3·9H2O | PVC | THF | / | 600–1000 °C, in air | [ | |
| CeO2 | Ce(acac)3 | PVP | Ethanol, acetone | / | 4.2 °C min−1, 500 °C for 2 h, in air | [ |
| Co3O4 | 2CoCO3·3Co(OH)2·H2O | / | H2O | Citric acid monohydrate | 1 °C min−1, 300–600 °C for 2 h, in air | [ |
| NiO | NiCO3·2Ni(OH)2·4H2O | / | H2O | Citric acid monohydrate | 1 °C min−1, 300–600 °C for 2 h, in air | [ |
| CuO | Cu(NO3)2 | PVP | Ethanol, H2O | / | 6 °C min−1, 500 °C for 1 h, in air | [ |
| Copper acetate | PVA | H2O | / | 10 °C min−1, 500 °C for 4 h, in air | [ | |
| SnO2 | SnCl4·5H2O | PVB | Ethanol | / | 2 °C min−1, 500 °C for 100 min, in air | [ |
| BaTiO3 | Tetrabutyl titanate, barium acetate | PVP | Acetic acid, ethanol | / | 2 °C min−1, 750 °C for 1 h, in air | [ |
| Tetrabutyl titanate, barium acetate | PVP | H2O, acetic acid, ethanol | / | 2 °C min−1, 400 °C for 3 h, 850 °C for 3 h, in air | [ | |
| Tetrabutyl titanate, barium acetate | PVP | Ethanol, acetic acid, H2O | / | 2 °C min−1, 550–1050 °C for 4 h, in air | [ | |
| Tetrabutyl titanate, barium acetate | PVP | Ethanol, acetic acid | / | 750 °C for 10 h, in air, oxygen, and nitrogen atmospheres | [ | |
| Barium acetate, titanium isopropoxide | PVP | Acetic acid, ethanol | / | 850 °C for 6 h, in air | [ | |
| Li0.33La0.56TiO3 | C12H28O4Ti, La(NO3)3·6H2O, LiNO3 | PVP | H2O, ethanol, acetic acid | / | 2 °C min−1, 400 °C for 4 h, 2 °C min−1, 800 °C for 4 h, in air | [ |
| Tetrabutyl titanate, La(NO3)3·6H2O, LiNO3 | PVP | DMF, acetic acid | / | 5 °C min−1, 700–900 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| Titanium isopropoxide, La(NO3)3·6H2O, LiNO3 | PVP | DMF, acetic acid | / | / | [ | |
| Li7La3Zr2O12 | LiNO3, La(NO3)3·6H2O, zirconium acetate | PVP | H2O, ethanol | / | 2 °C min−1, 400 °C for 4 h, 2 °C min−1, 800 °C for 4 h, in air | [ |
| CaCu3Ti4O12 | Tetra-n-butyl orthotitanate, copper(II) nitrate trihydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate | PVP | Acetic acid, methanol, ethanol | / | 10 °C min−1, 600–900 °C for 4 h, in air | [ |
| Cupric acetate, calcium nitrate, tetrabutyl titanate | PVP | Acetic acid, ethanol | / | 10 °C min−1, 600–1130 °C, in air | [ | |
Tetra-n-butyl orthotitanate, copper(II) nitrate trihydrate, copper(II) chloride, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, calcium chloride | PVP | Acetic acid, methanol, ethanol | / | 900 °C for 4 h, in air | [ | |
| Yttrium–aluminum-garnet (YAG) | AlCl3·6H2O, aluminum powder, yttrium acetate hydrate | / | H2O | / | 700–1000 °C for 2 h, in air | [ |
| Indium tin oxide | In(NO3)3·4.5H2O, SnCl4·5H2O | PVB | Ethanol | / | 2 °C min−1, 450 °C for 2 h in air, 2 °C min−1, 300 °C for 1.5 h in H2 atmosphere | [ |
| In(NO3)3·4.5H2O, SnCl4·5H2O | PVP | H2O | / | 800 °C for 2 h, in air | [ | |
| YBCO | Yttrium acetate hydrate, barium acetate, copper acetate monohydrate | PVP | Methanol, acetic acid, propionic acid | / | 1 °C min−1, 450 °C, 3 h/3 °C min−1, 820 °C, 14 h/1 °C min−1, 925 °C, 1 h/1 °C min−1, 725 °C, 3 h/3 °C min−1, 450 °C, 12 h, in O2 atmosphere | [ |
| MFe2O4 (M = Cu, Co, Ni) | Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O | PVP | Ethanol, DMF, glacial acetic acid | / | 5 °C min−1, 200 °C for 2 h, 2 °C min−1, 800 °C for 2 h, in air | [ |
| SiC | Methyltrimethoxysilane, dimethyldimethoxysilane | / | Ethanol | H2O, nitric acid | / | [ |
| PCS | PVP | DMF, THF | / | 2 °C min−1, stabilized at 210 °C for 2 h in air, calcinated at 800 °C for 2 h, 1300 °C for 2 h in Ar | [ | |
| PCS | PMMA | Toluene, DMF | / | Stabilized at 170 °C for 3 h in air, calcinated at 1100–1500 °C in N2/calcinated at 1500 °C in Ar | [ | |
| Methyltrimethoxysilane, dimethyldimethoxysilane | / | Ethanol, H2O | / | 5 °C min−1, 1550 °C for 2 h, in Ar | [ | |
| PCS | PEO | Xylene, H2O | Sodium dodecyl sulfate | Stabilized at 200 °C for 10 h in air, calcinated at 1400 °C for 2 h in Ar | [ | |
| Polysilocarbonsilane | / | / | Aluminium acetylacetonate | Stabilized at 160–220 °C for 6–8 h in air, calcinated at 1800 °C in Ar | [ | |
| SiOC | PCS | PS | Xylene, DMF | Sodium dodecyl sulfate | 1 °C min−1, stabilized at 210 °C for 2 h in air, calcinated at 1100 °C in Ar | [ |
| Silicone resin | PVP | Isopropanol, DMF, chloroform | Dibutyltin dilaurate, Zr-acetylacetonate, Triton X-100 surfactant, sodium chloride | Stabilized at 200 °C for 1 h in air, 2 °C min−1, calcinated at 1000 °C for 2 h in Ar | [ | |
| SiCN | PCS | PVP | DMF, chloroform | / | 2 °C min−1, 180 °C, 1 °C min−1, 210 °C for 2 h; 2 °C min−1, 250 °C, 1 °C min−1, 850 °C, 2 °C min−1, 1300 °C for 3–7 h in N2 | [ |
| ZrC | ZrOCl2·8H2O, PAN, sucrose | / | DMF | / | 3 °C min−1, 1200–1400 °C for 2 h in Ar | [ |
| Zirconium acetyl acetonate, phenolic resin | 2,4-pentanedione, ethanol | H2O, H2SO4 | / | 800–1600 °C for 2 h in Ar | [ | |
| BN | Boric acid, melamine | / | H2O, tertiary butyl alcohol | / | 1200 °C for 3 h in NH3 | [ |
| Si3N4 | Methyltrimethoxysilane, dimethyldimethoxysilane | / | Ethanol | H2O, nitric acid | 5 °C min−1, 1500 °C for 2 h in N2 | [ |
| Silica sol, carbon black | / | / | Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide | 3 °C min−1, 1600 °C for 3 h in N2 | [ | |
| GaN | Gallium nitrate | PVP | H2O, ethanol | / | 10 °C min−1, 500 °C for 4 h in air, 450 °C for 1 h in air, 2 °C min−1 (NH3), 850 °C for 2 h in Ar | [ |
| ZnS | Zinc acetate | PVP | Ethanol, H2O | / | 2 °C min−1, 550 °C for 1 h in air, 500 °C in H2S atmosphere | [ |
| Boehmite | Boehmite, aluminum hydroxide, hexamethylenetetramine | / | Acetic acid | / | 600–1300 °C | [ |
| Hydroxyapatite | NaOH, CaCl2, NaH2PO4·2H2O | / | H2O, methanol, oleic acid | / | / | [ |
| CaCl2, sodium oleate, (NaPO3)6 | / | H2O | / | / | [ | |
| Cu2ZnSnS4 | CuCl2, ZnCl2, SnCl4·5H2O, thiourea | PVP, cellulose acetate | Acetone, H2O, ethanol | / | 2 °C min−1, 450 °C for 3 h in N2 | [ |
| Cu(CH3COO)2, Zn(CH3COO)2, SnCl2, thiourea | PVB | Ethanol | / | 0.5 °C min−1, 150–550 °C, in air | [ |
TEOS tetraethyl orthosilicate, PVA poly(vinyl alcohol), PVP poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), PEO poly(ethylene oxide), PVB poly(vinyl butyral), DMF N,N-dimethylformamide, PVAc poly(vinyl acetate), PLA poly(lactic acid), THF tetrahydrofuran, PVC poly(vinyl chloride), PCS polycarbosilane, PMMA poly(methyl methacrylate), PS polystyrene, PAN polyacrylonitrile, BN boron nitride
Fig. 2Fabrication of FCFs with centrifugal spinning. a Schematic of a typical centrifugal spinning equipment. b SEM image of ITO nanofibers with disordered distribution. c Schematic of another typical centrifugal spinning equipment with different configuration. d SEM image of aligned SiO2 nanotube fibers. b
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [69]. Copyright 2015, Springer Nature BV. c Reproduced with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright 2014, Elsevier. d Reproduced with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 2014, Elsevier
Fig. 3Electrospinning for preparation of FCFs. a Schematic of a typical electrospinning device. b Digital image showing the electrified spinning solution jet. The exposure time is 1/250 s. c Digital image shows the trace of the electrified spinning solution jet in the instable region. The exposure time is 18 ns. d Procedures for the preparation of FCFs by electrospinning. a
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [117]. Copyright 2006, John Wiley and Sons. b, c Reproduced with permission from Ref. [118]. Copyright 2001, Elsevier. d Reproduced with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier
Fig. 4Solution blow spinning for preparation of FCFs. a Schematic of a solution blow spinning device. b Schematic showing the state of the nozzle position, where the spinning solution is pumped through the inner nozzle and stretched by the high-pressure gas flow (P1) from the outer nozzle. An area of low pressure (P2) is formed around the inner nozzle, which draws the spinning solution into a cone. c Digital image of the spinning solution jet taken by a high-speed camera. d Digital image showing the Taylor cone of spinning solution formed at the end of the spinneret. e Digital image of the PVA-TEOS solution. f SEM image of the PVA-SiO2 composite microfibers. g SEM images of the SiO2 microfibers. h Digital image of ceramic fiber papers. i Digital image of a ceramic fiber sponge. a, h
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [4]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. b, d Reproduced with permission from Ref. [126]. Copyright 2009, John Wiley and Sons. c Reproduced with permission from Ref. [127]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. e–g, i Reproduced with permission from Ref. [3]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature
Fig. 5Preparation of BN nanoribbons by hydrogen bond self-assembly. a Schematic showing the synthesis of BN nanoribbons. b, c SEM images of the BN nanoribbons.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [88]. Copyright 2019, John Wiley and Sons
Fig. 6Preparation of Al2O3 fiber sponges by ALD. a Schematic showing the preparation of Al2O3 fiber sponges by ALD method. The preparation process includes preparation of PVP fiber sponge by solution blow spinning, atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 layer, and PVP removal by calcination. Digital images and SEM images of b PVP fiber sponges prepared by solution blow spinning, c PVP-Al2O3 composite fiber sponges obtained by atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 layer, and d Al2O3 fiber sponges obtained after template removal.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [130]. Copyright 2017, John Wiley and Sons
Fig. 7Preparation of SiC nanowire aerogels by CVD method. a Schematic showing the preparation of SiC nanowire aerogels by CVD method. b Digital image of a piece of SiC nanowire aerogel. c Digital image of a SiC nanowire aerogel standing on a dandelion. d SEM image of the SiC nanowire aerogels showing the highly porous three-dimensional structure. e TEM image of the SiC nanowires.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society
Fig. 8Preparation of Co/SiC fiber mats by electrospinning combined with polymer precursor conversion method. The photograph on the top right corner, shows the Co/SiC fiber mat, and the SEM image, shown at bottom right corner, shows the morphology of the Co/SiC fiber mat, prepared by polymer conversion.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [134]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society
Comparison of different FCF preparation methods
| Methods | Material types | Advantages | Disadvantages | Fiber diameter | Industrialization prospect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centrifugal spinning | Melt | High efficiency | Relatively poor flexibility | > 1 μm | High | [ |
| Solution | High efficiency; broad material choice | Removal of polymer | Tens of nanometers to a few microns | Relatively high | [ | |
| Sol | High efficiency; high yield; polymer free | Ununiform diameter | Hundreds of nanometers to tens of microns | Relatively high | [ | |
| Electrospinning | Solution | Small and uniform diameter; diverse compositions and morphologies | Low efficiency; high voltage; removal of polymer | Tens of nanometers to a few microns | Relatively low | [ |
| Sol | High yield; polymer free | Nonuniform diameter; high voltage | Tens of nanometers to a few microns | Relatively low | [ | |
| Solution blow spinning | Solution | Simple and safe process; high efficiency; diverse compositions and structures | Removal of polymers | Tens of nanometers to a few microns | Relatively high | [ |
| Self-assembly | Solution | Ribbon structure | Limited material choice; low efficiency; removal of organic | Width: hundreds of nanometers to a few microns Thickness: a few nanometers | Low | [ |
| Atomic layer deposition | Solution | Hollow structure; controllable diameter | Complicated process; low efficiency; limited material choice | Tens of nanometers to a few microns | Low | [ |
| Chemical vapor deposition | Gas | Small and uniform diameter; non-oxide component | Low efficiency; limited material choice | Tens to hundreds of nanometers | Low | [ |
| Polymer conversion | Solution | Non-oxide component | Low efficiency; calcination in inert atmosphere | Tens of nanometers to a few microns | Relatively low | [ |
Fig. 9Thermal insulation properties of FCFs. Thermal conductivity of SiO2-Al2O3 composite fiber sponges a with different densities, b along two different layer directions at different temperatures. c Digital images showing the compressibility of the SiO2-Al2O3 composite fiber sponges burned with a butane blowlamp and immersed in liquid nitrogen, respectively. d Digital image showing the SiC nanowire aerogels with a thickness of 10 mm can protect fresh petals from withering when heated by an alcohol lamp. e Thermal conductivity of the SiC nanowire aerogels at different temperatures in a nitrogen atmosphere. f Digital image showing the thermal insulation performance of SiC fiber mat. g Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of SiC fiber mat at different temperatures. a–c
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [3]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature. d–e Reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. f, g Reproduced with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry
Fig. 10Air filtration application of FCFs. a Filtration efficiency of YSZ nanofiber sponges to NaCl particles with different particle sizes at different airflow velocities at room temperature. b PM concentration before and after filtration with YSZ sponges at 750 °C. c Filtration efficiency of YSZ sponges to PM0.3–2.5 and PM2.5–10 at 750 °C. d Digital images showing the application of hydroxyapatite nanowire aerogels in breathing masks. e Comparison of filtration properties and working temperature for the ASZ papers and other flexible filter materials. a–c
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [5]. Copyright 2018, John Wiley and Sons. d Reproduced with permission from Ref. [98]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. e Reproduced with permission from Ref. [4]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society
Fig. 11Absorption properties of SiC nanowire aerogels to oil and organic solvents. a Digital image showing the absorption process of SiC nanowire aerogel to kerosene (kerosene was stained with Sudan III). b Digital image showing the repeatability of the absorption process. c Absorption capability of the SiC nanowire aerogels to various organic solvents. Recyclability of the SiC nanowire aerogels via d squeezing of the absorbed kerosene and e burning the absorbed ethanol.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society
Fig. 12Sound absorption application of SiO2-Al2O3 composite fiber sponges. a Digital image of the sponges used to determine the sound absorption characteristic. b Sound absorption coefficient and c noise reduction coefficient (NRC) of the sponges with different thicknesses. d Comparison of sound absorption property of sponges with the other reported sound absorbing materials. e Schematic of the mechanism of the sound wave absorption in the sponges.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [3]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature
Fig. 13Electromagnetic wave absorption application of FCFs. a SEM image of aligned SiC nanofibers. b Frequency and thickness dependance of RL for the composites with aligned SiC nanofibers. c Conductivity of the HfC/SiC nanofiber mats with different HfC contents. d Frequency and thickness dependance of RL for the silicon resin composites with HfC/SiC nanofibers (The content of HfC in the nanofibers is 2.5 wt%). e Digital image of a SCNF. f Frequency dependance of RL for the SCNFs with different thicknesses. g Schematic showing the electromagnetic wave absorption mechanism of the SCNFs. a, b
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [136]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. c, d Reproduced with permission from Ref. [137]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. e–g Reproduced with permission from Ref. [132]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society
Fig. 14Battery separator application of FCFs. a SEM image of the LLZO nanofiber films. (Inset is a photo of LLZO nanofiber film). b Digital images showing the electrolyte wettability of the LLZO nanofiber films. c Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of the NCA/LLZO/Li battery with a termination charging voltage of 4.6 V at 0.5 C. d Cycling stability evaluation of discharge capacity and Coulombic efficiency for the NCA/LLZO/Li and NCA/Celgard/Li batteries. e Digital image of an Al-doped LLZO nanofiber film. f Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of the composite electrolytes at different temperatures. g Charge–discharge curves of the solid-state NCA/EACN/Li batteries at 0.2 C. h Coulombic efficiency and capacity of the NCA/EACN/Li batteries at 0.2 C. a–d
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. e–h Reproduced with permission from Ref. [156]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier
Fig. 15Catalytic application of FCFs. a SEM image of LSCF/CeO2 nanofibers. b Peak power density of the LSCF cathodes in the temperature range of 600–700 °C. c Stability evaluation of the single cells with LSCF cathodes under a constant voltage of 0.4 V at 600 °C. d Schematic showing the preparation of Cu-Al2O3 fibrous membranes. e Schematic showing the synthesis process of Ag/ZnO/γ-Al2O3 nanofibers. a–c
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [157]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. d Reproduced with permission from Ref. [161]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry. e Reproduced with permission from Ref. [162]. Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry