Mingzhan Wang1, Xiang He2, Eli Hoenig1, Gangbin Yan1, Guiming Peng1, Fengyuan Shi3, Julia Radhakrishnan1, Grant Hill1, David M Tiede2, Hua Zhou4, Chong Liu1. 1. Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. 2. Advanced Materials for Energy-Water Systems (AMEWS) Energy Frontier Research Center and Chemical Sciences and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA. 3. Electron Microscopy Core, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA. 4. X-Ray Science Division, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA.
Abstract
Controlling the ion transport through graphene oxide (GO) membrane is challenging, particularly in the aqueous environment due to its strong swelling tendency. Fine-tuning the interlayer spacing and chemistry is critical to create highly selective membranes. We investigate the effect of single-site divalent cations in tuning GO membrane properties. Competitive ionic permeation test indicates that Cu2+ cations dominate the transport through the 2D channels of GO membrane over other cations (Mg2+/Ca2+/Co2+). Without/With the single-site M2+ modifications, pristine GO, Mg-GO, Ca-GO, and Cu-GO membranes show interlayer spacings of ∼13.6, 15.6, 14.5, and 12.3 Å in wet state, respectively. The Cu-GO membrane shows a two-fold decrease of NaCl (1 M) permeation rate comparing to pristine GO, Mg-GO, and Ca-GO membranes. In reverse osmosis tests using 1000 ppm NaCl and Na2SO4 as feeds, Cu-GO membrane shows rejection of ∼78% and ∼94%, respectively, which are 5%-10% higher than its counterpart membranes.
Controlling the ion transport through graphene oxide (GO) membrane is challenging, particularly in the aqueous environment due to its strong swelling tendency. Fine-tuning the interlayer spacing and chemistry is critical to create highly selective membranes. We investigate the effect of single-site divalent cations in tuning GO membrane properties. Competitive ionic permeation test indicates that Cu2+ cations dominate the transport through the 2D channels of GO membrane over other cations (Mg2+/Ca2+/Co2+). Without/With the single-site M2+ modifications, pristine GO, Mg-GO, Ca-GO, and Cu-GO membranes show interlayer spacings of ∼13.6, 15.6, 14.5, and 12.3 Å in wet state, respectively. The Cu-GO membrane shows a two-fold decrease of NaCl (1 M) permeation rate comparing to pristine GO, Mg-GO, and Ca-GO membranes. In reverse osmosis tests using 1000 ppm NaCl and Na2SO4 as feeds, Cu-GO membrane shows rejection of ∼78% and ∼94%, respectively, which are 5%-10% higher than its counterpart membranes.
With the climate change and increasing global population, water scarcity is projected to be a more and more challenging problem (Shannon et al., 2008). Producing clean water from saline water (e.g. seawater) via desalination is highly desirable (Elimelech and Phillip, 2011; Werber et al., 2016). Owing to the high energy efficiency and economic viability, membrane-based reverse osmosis is among the most appealing desalination technologies, including distillation, direct solar steaming (Fang et al., 2013; Jia et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019a; Zhao et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2016), and membrane-based desalination (Humplik et al., 2011) (Park et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2018). Designing better membrane materials to achieve both high selectivity and high permeability will benefit the desalination energy efficiency as well as reduce the footprint of desalination plant.Studies in the past decade have shown that carbon-based nanomaterials could be promising candidates to serve as high-performance reverse osmosis membrane (Huang et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016). For example, aligned carbon nanotube forest membrane is demonstrated to have an ultrafast water transport while keeping a high salt rejection rate (Fornasiero et al., 2008; Holt et al., 2006). Recently, theoretical predictions and experimental results indicate that single-layer graphene with sub-nanoscale pores could achieve nearly complete salt rejection and water permeability several orders of magnitude higher than commercial polymer membrane (Cohen-Tanugi and Grossman, 2012; Surwade et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2019b). However, it is challenging to develop a scalable and convenient method to create robust single-layer graphene with uniform sub-nanoscale pores (O'Hern et al., 2015; Wang and Karnik, 2012). As an alternative, graphene oxide (GO) membrane with well-defined two-dimensional channels, can be readily fabricated in a scalable manner and is demonstrated to have high permeability to water (Nair et al., 2012) with a clear-cut size sieving effect for hydrated ions and small organic molecules (Joshi et al., 2014; Nie et al., 2020). Yet, GO suffers from significant swelling in its wet state due to the oxygen-rich functional groups on the surface. The resultant channel height, i.e. interlayer spacing of GO is typically above 1 nm in wet state, thus falling short of achieving efficient rejection to ions with small hydrated radius (Mi, 2019). Mechanical confinement (Abraham et al., 2017), controlled reduction (Zhang et al., 2018), chemical spacers (Chen et al., 2017; Jia et al., 2016; Morelos-Gomez et al., 2017; Thebo et al., 2018) etc. have been investigated to inhibit the swelling of GO membrane in its wet state. Interestingly, potassium ion (K+)-treated GO membranes are reported to be capable of rejecting ions efficiently in the H-cell trans-membrane permeation test, presumably due to the resultant fixed interlayer spacing of GO membrane (Chen et al., 2017). Similar result is also reported for the Al3+-treated MXene membranes (Ding et al., 2020).Structurally, it is generally accepted that GO is composed of intact graphene patches and oxygen-rich functional groups, like hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl etc.(Dreyer et al., 2010) When considering the interactions between metal cations and GO matrices, besides the well-known electrostatic interactions between metal ions and carboxylate group, the cation-π interactions also play an important role (Liu et al., 2015; Mahadevi and Sastry, 2013; Sun et al., 2014), as schematically illustrated in Figure 1. Compared with monovalent potassium ion, metal cations with higher valence can have stronger interactions with GO. The case should be more prominent for transition metal cations particularly, where the presence of d orbital electrons will lead to much richer chemistry there.
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the possible interactions between divalent metal cations and graphene oxide matrices
For clarity, only the predominant hydroxyl and carboxyl group are presented in GO sheet and their ratios are not commensurate with the real sample used. M2+ represents divalent metal cation.
Schematic illustration of the possible interactions between divalent metal cations and graphene oxide matricesFor clarity, only the predominant hydroxyl and carboxyl group are presented in GO sheet and their ratios are not commensurate with the real sample used. M2+ represents divalent metal cation.Here, we investigated the interactions of divalent ions to GO membrane and their roles in controlling the mass transport through GO membranes. We discovered that Cu2+ dominated the transport across the GO membranes with the presence of equal molarity of Mg2+ and Ca2+. When used as spacers, Cu2+ could decrease the interlayer spacing of GO in the wet state from 13.6 Å to 12.3 Å. However, Ca2+ and Mg2+ enlarged the interlayer spacing of GO membranes to 15.6 Å and 14.5 Å, respectively. Trans-membrane permeation tests showed that the GO membrane with Cu2+ decoration decreased the permeability to salt (1M NaCl) to half as compared to pristine GO membrane. The reverse osmosis tests also verified that with Cu2+ decoration, the GO membrane could enhance the rejection rates of 1000 ppm and 2000 ppm NaCl feed solution from ∼70% to ∼78% and from ∼60% to ∼69%, respectively. By contrast, Ca2+ and Mg2+ decorations did not show obvious effect to GO membranes in both the trans-membrane permeation tests and reverse osmosis tests. Our results coherently point to the exotic role of Cu2+ in tuning the interlayer chemistry of graphene oxide.
Results and discussion
Competitive permeation test of divalent cations across GO membrane
Well-dispersed GO colloidal solution was used as the precursor for membrane fabrication (Figure S1). Pristine GO membrane was made by filtering GO solution onto a porous and nonselective PTFE support under the assistance of vacuum. See Transparent Method section in the supplemental information for detailed membrane fabrication procedure. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that the as-prepared GO membrane was a uniform film with a topology fluctuation translated from the underlying PTFE support (Figure S2). The thickness of GO membrane for tests is ∼120 nm (dry state, 0.5 mg loading) unless noted otherwise.First, we performed the competitive permeation test of M2+ cations across GO membrane, which was mounted in between the two chambers of H-type cell, as schematically illustrated in Figure 2A. 20 mL of the mixture solution of MgCl2/CaCl2/CoCl2/CuCl2 with equal molarity (∼10 mM, pH ∼4.7) was added into the feed chamber, while 20 mL of deionized water was added into the permeate chamber. Co2+ and Cu2+ are chosen as the representatives of transitional metal ions, given their stability and strong bindings with carboxylate group. Both chambers were stirred vigorously to mitigate the concentration polarization. Driven by the concentration gradient, the ions would diffuse from the feed to permeate, across the tortuous two-dimensional channels within GO membranes (Figures 2B and 2C), and water molecules would be reversely transported across GO membranes simultaneously to balance the osmosis pressure between the feed and permeate. Figures 2D and 2E show the photos of the start and the end of the permeation test, respectively. The initial mixture solution of MgCl2/CaCl2/CoCl2/CuCl2 with equal molarity takes a pink color originating from the hexaaqua Co2+ ions [Co(H2O)6]2+ (Figure 2D). During and at the end of the test, the solution in the feed chamber was still pink while that in the permeate chamber was nearly colorless (Figure 2E). Besides, a level difference ∼3 mm was developed between the feed chamber and the permeate chamber due to osmosis. Both the developed level difference and color difference are reliable testaments to the integrity of the tested GO membrane and definitely point to the distinguishable transport rates of M2+ metal ions across the two-dimensional channels in GO membrane.
Figure 2
Competitive trans-membrane permeation test of M2+ cations with equal molarity across GO membrane
(A) Schematic of the trans-membrane permeation test in an H-type cell. Chloride anion (Cl−) is omitted in the schematic for clarity.
(B) Schematic of the mass transport pathways in the two-dimensional channels within GO membrane.
(C) Cross-sectional SEM image of GO membrane (mass loading 1 mg) showing a well-defined layered structure.
(D and E) Photos showing the start and the end of the competitive trans-membrane permeation test setup, respectively.
(F) Time-dependent cationic concentrations in the permeate side. The rectangle box highlights the concentration profile crossover of Cu2+ between the feed and permeate.
(G) Linear fitting of the cationic concentration profiles of the permeate chamber in the initial permeation stage.
Competitive trans-membrane permeation test of M2+ cations with equal molarity across GO membrane(A) Schematic of the trans-membrane permeation test in an H-type cell. Chloride anion (Cl−) is omitted in the schematic for clarity.(B) Schematic of the mass transport pathways in the two-dimensional channels within GO membrane.(C) Cross-sectional SEM image of GO membrane (mass loading 1 mg) showing a well-defined layered structure.(D and E) Photos showing the start and the end of the competitive trans-membrane permeation test setup, respectively.(F) Time-dependent cationic concentrations in the permeate side. The rectangle box highlights the concentration profile crossover of Cu2+ between the feed and permeate.(G) Linear fitting of the cationic concentration profiles of the permeate chamber in the initial permeation stage.To quantify the trans-membrane transport rates of M2+ metal ions, we traced the cationic concentration changes in both the feed chamber and permeate chamber by ICP-MS. The result is shown in Figure 2F. Clearly, the concentrations of all the metal cations in permeate increased with time elapsing and tended to reach a stable value at the final stage, indicating the tendency toward the thermodynamics equilibrium between the feed and the permeate (see the detailed discussion in Figure S3). At the end of permeation test, the concentrations of Mg2+/Ca2+/Co2+/Cu2+ in the permeate and in the feed were 3.05/5.03/3.22/5.64 mM and 7.63/6.16/6.45/4.06 mM, respectively. At least, two striking points are noteworthy here. Firstly, the concentration of Cu2+ in the permeate is not only higher than those of other cations in the permeate but also higher than that of Cu2+ in the feed side since the middle of permeation test (from ∼73 h as the rectangle box highlights in Figure 2F). By contrast, the concentration of Mg2+/Ca2+/Co2+ in permeate is always lower than those in the feed side. The imbalanced distribution of the cations across the GO membrane is a reflection of their differences in the transmembrane transport speeds. The cross-over of Cu2+ can be explained by the tendency to achieve the global equilibrium across the membrane, which necessitates the collective motions of all the ions. Such imbalanced ion distribution might also suggest the establishment of Gibbs-Donnan potential across the membrane (Fievet, 2014). Secondly, by fitting the concentration data of permeate in the initial stage when the volume changes of permeate and the feed are negligible, the trans-membrane permeation rates of M2+ can be extracted by calculating the slopes (Figure 2G) (Joshi et al., 2014). The permeabilities of Mg2+, Ca2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ are 120.8±2.0, 448.0±20.0, 180.3±1.1, and 713.6±10.0 mmol m−2 hour−1, respectively. Interestingly, we find that the permeation rates of the ions do not simply follow the trend of their hydrated radii. The hydrated radii of Mg2+, Ca2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ are 4.28, 4.12, 4.23, and 4.19 Å, respectively (Nightingale, 1959). On the other hand, the hydrated ions might undergo partly dehydration or deformation of the hydration shell to accommodate themselves into such confined two-dimensional nanochannels within GO membrane (Abraham et al., 2017; Chmiola et al., 2006). However, the fact that Cu2+ has the largest hydration enthalpy among the group should make it hardest to dehydrate or deform when passing through the confined two-dimensional nanochannels, thus pointing exactly to the contrary, i.e. the slowest permeation rate of Cu2+ (the hydration enthalpies of Mg2+, Ca2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ are −1922, −1592, −2054, and −2,100 kJ/mol, respectively) (Burgess, 1978). Therefore, we attribute the counterintuitive fastest permeability of Cu2+ and imbalanced distribution of cations to the stronger interaction of Cu2+ cation with GO membrane comparing to other ions.Besides our observation here, several evidence in the literatures can be invoked to support our conjecture here. First, Mg2+ or Ca2+ is free of whereas Cu2+ has d electrons, which play a central role in enabling coordination. The carboxyl groups can chelate with Cu2+ more tightly than Mg2+ and Ca2+. Moreover, Tan et al. also reported that Cd2+ and Ni2+ in GO membrane could be displaced by Cu2+ (Tan et al., 2016). Recent theoretical calculations also show that Cu2+ has a much stronger adsorption energy on graphite with the cation-π interaction included (Shi et al., 2013).
Modification of GO membrane with single-site divalent cation (M-GO)
We then investigated the role of individual divalent ions in controlling the interlayer spacing of GO membranes. For the divalent metal cation-bridged GO membranes (denoted as M-GO), corresponding aqueous salt solution (0.01 M MgCl2, CaCl2, or CuCl2 in water) was filtered through the as-prepared pristine GO membrane. See the Membrane fabrication section in the Method Details for detailed membrane modification procedures. SEM images of as-prepared membrane showed that there was no apparent morphological change after metal cation modifications (Figures S4A and S4B). We note that compared with the method of mixing of GO solution and salt solution together before membrane filtration (Mathesh et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2021), our modification method can avoid the aggregation or crumpling of GO flakes, thus guaranteeing the layered structure and the well-defined two-dimensional channels within the GO membrane (Figure S4C).Notably, with the modifications of divalent cations, the colors of GO membranes turned darker visually (Figure 3A). UV-Vis spectra showed the enhanced absorption of GO membrane after the cation modifications nearly across the whole spectrum (Figure S5A). No obvious changes could be seen in the Raman spectra (Figure S5B). The stable concentrations of M2+ inside the GO membrane were measured by ICP-MS. As shown in Figure S6, the result showed Cu2+ had a decoration value of 2.21 × 10−7 mol per mg of GO (mol/mgGO), higher than those of Mg2+ (0.43 × 10−7 mol/mgGO) and Ca2+ (1.45 × 10−7 mol/mgGO). The results could further support the conclusion drawn from the permeation test of M2+ in Figure 2, namely Cu2+ has stronger interactions with GO matrices. The high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscope (HAAF-STEM) was used to identify the metal cations on GO. The images indicate that the divalent metal cations are populated randomly within GO membrane in the single-site form (Figures 3B and S7). Cu2+ showed higher decoration density in the GO membrane.
Figure 3
Characterization of M-GO membrane
(A) Photo of as-prepared GO-based membranes.
(B) HAADF-STEM image of Cu-GO. White cycles highlight some single-site Cu2+ in the membrane.
(C) XANES spectra of Cu K-edge.
(D) Fourier transformed EXAFS spectra of Cu K-edge in R space.
(E) PDFs of dry GO-based membranes. Note: Raw diffraction profiles and the corresponding reduced structure functions can be found in Figures S8 and S9.
(F) Close-up view of the plots in (E). The circle highlights the unique peak present in Cu-GO membrane.
(G and H) XRD patterns of GO-based dry and wet membranes, respectively.
Characterization of M-GO membrane(A) Photo of as-prepared GO-based membranes.(B) HAADF-STEM image of Cu-GO. White cycles highlight some single-site Cu2+ in the membrane.(C) XANES spectra of Cu K-edge.(D) Fourier transformed EXAFS spectra of Cu K-edge in R space.(E) PDFs of dry GO-based membranes. Note: Raw diffraction profiles and the corresponding reduced structure functions can be found in Figures S8 and S9.(F) Close-up view of the plots in (E). The circle highlights the unique peak present in Cu-GO membrane.(G and H) XRD patterns of GO-based dry and wet membranes, respectively.To gain more insights of the electronic and chemical environment of divalent metal ion in graphene oxide membrane, synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectra of Cu-GO membrane were collected. The Cu K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) confirms the copper ion remains divalent (Figure 3C). The extended X-ray fine structure (EXAFS) profiles in R space indicate that Cu species in GO shared similar characteristic coordination shells with copper (II) acetate hydrate (Figure 3D). The result suggests the strong interactions between Cu2+ and carboxylate group in GO, as schematically illustrated in Figure 1.Further efforts were made to probe the atomic structures of the ion-decorated GO membranes using the pair distribution function (PDF) analysis of the total X-ray scattering profiles (Figures S8A and S9A). As shown in Figure S8B, the reduced structure functions of all dry GO membranes show strong and sharp Bragg peaks and broad diffuse features in low-Q and high-Q regions, respectively. In comparison, the reduced structure function of Ca-GO is very similar to that of the pristine dry GO membrane, while noticeable variation in the reduced structure function was found in the case of Cu-GO, suggesting the modified atomic structure of GO caused by the decoration of Cu2+. After the Fourier transform of the reduced structure functions, real-space PDF patterns of the GO membranes are obtained and presented in Figure 3E. Overall, all the GO membranes present characteristic PDF patterns of graphene-based structures that are consistent with the previously reported data, (Woznica et al., 2015) which indicate that the decorations of metal ions do not damage the structural integrity of the parent GO membranes. Strikingly, one distinguishable atomic pair correlation at 1.97 Å that is absent in both dry GO and dry Ca-GO was found in the Cu-GO membrane (as circled out in Figure 3F), which should originate from the atomic pair distance between the decorated Cu2+ and the O in GO, once again corroborating the stronger interactions between the Cu2+ ions and the oxygen-rich functional groups on the GO surface, in good agreement with the EXAFS analysis mentioned above. The same PDF analyses were also carried out on the wet GO-based membranes (See Figure S9 for details), which show similar PDF patterns as the dry samples, implying the robustness of the atomic structure of GO in aqueous solutions. Of particular note, the wet Cu-GO membrane still exhibits a uniquely distinguished atomic pair correlation at 1.97 Å, confirming the stability of the decorated Cu2+ ions on GO membranes in the aqueous environments.The interlayer spacings after M2+ decoration were measured using XRD. XRD patterns of as-prepared membranes in the dry state are shown in Figure 3G. The interlayer spacing of dry pristine GO membrane was ca. 8.4 angstrom (Å), while the interlayer spacings of dry GO membranes with the modification of all the three divalent cations become larger, i.e. Mg-GO (8.7 Å), Ca-GO (8.7 Å), and Cu-GO (8.6 Å). This is consistent with previous work reporting the enlarged interlayer spacings of GO membrane with Mg2+ and Ca2+ modification (Park et al., 2008). As mentioned before, GO membranes tend to swell in water, as shown in the XRD patterns (Figure 3H). However, M-GO membranes behave sharply contrasted when swollen in water. Similar to previous results (Chen et al., 2017), wet Mg-GO (15.6 Å) and Ca-GO (14.5 Å) membranes have larger interlayer spacings as compared with wet pristine GO (13.6 Å) membrane. But the Cu-GO membrane has a surprisingly suppressed interlayer spacing (12.3 Å) in the wet state. The result also indicates the superiority of our single Cu2+ cations modification method as opposed to previously reported Cu foil modification, which showed no decrease of interlayer spacing of wet GO membrane (Lv et al., 2020). A decreased interlayer spacing in the Cu-GO would benefit the membrane to have stronger repulsion to counter ions as well as better size sieving effect. Considering the thickness of GO sheet (∼3.3 Å), the available space in the two-dimensional channels of the pristine GO, Mg-GO, and Ca-GO could accommodate approximately four to five layers of water in the wet state, while Cu-GO would accommodate approximately one layer less of water (Algara-Siller et al., 2015; Joshi et al., 2014; Ohkubo et al., 2018). As discussed in the former part, it is reasonable to infer that the strong interactions between Cu2+ and GO matrices render the inhibited swelling of and reduced water population within GO membrane. Like other cross-linked GO membrane (Jia et al., 2016; Lv et al., 2020; Park et al., 2008; Thebo et al., 2018; Yeh et al., 2015), we also observed the increased mechanical strength of M2+-modified GO membranes when compared with unmodified GO membrane.
Forward and reverse osmosis tests of M-GO membranes
Encouraged by the different swelling behaviors of divalent metal cation-modified GO, we then examined their trans-membrane permeation rate to salt. The method is similar to the competitive transmembrane test in Figure 2A. Basically, different GO-based membranes to be tested were mounted in between the two chambers of H-type cell, and then 20 mL of 1 M NaCl aqueous solution and deionized water (DIW) were added into the separate chambers simultaneously, as schematically illustrated in Figure 4A. Both chambers were stirred vigorously to mitigate the concentration polarization as well. The conductivity of permeate was continuously monitored. Linear increase of the conductivity on the DIW side was observed for all membranes tested (Figure 4B). The trans-membrane permeation rates were extracted by calculating the slopes (Joshi et al., 2014). The permeation rates of porous PTFE support, pristine GO/PTFE, Mg-GO/PTFE, Ca-GO/PTFE, and Cu-GO/PTFE membranes are 12.79±0.10, 5.16±0.08, 5.21±0.01, 5.59±0.01, and 2.53±0.01 mol m−2 hour−1, respectively. The results clearly show that 1) compared with bare porous PTFE support, GO membranes with well-defined nanoscale 2D channels can efficiently slow down the permeation rate; 2) compared with pristine GO membrane, Mg-GO and Ca-GO did not show obvious decrease in the trans-membrane permeation rates, while Cu-GO membrane is more effective in blocking the transport of NaCl.
Figure 4
Trans-membrane permeation tests of NaCl across the GO-based membrane
(A) Schematic of the trans-membrane permeation rate test in an H-type cell.
(B) Time-dependent conductivity change of permeate.
Trans-membrane permeation tests of NaCl across the GO-based membrane(A) Schematic of the trans-membrane permeation rate test in an H-type cell.(B) Time-dependent conductivity change of permeate.The transports of water and ions across the GO-based membranes are mainly determined by two factors, namely the size exclusion effect and charge effect (Fornasiero et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2017). It is worth noting that even though Mg-GO and Ca-GO have larger interlayer spacings in the wet state than pristine GO as detected in XRD patterns, their permeation rates change slightly. It can be thus inferred that the Mg2+ and Ca2+ might help enhance the local charge density in GO membrane, which to some extent offset the enlarged interlayer spacing therein. Likewise, the decreased permeation rate of Cu-GO can be ascribed to the synergistically enhanced size exclusion effect and charge effect.Besides examining the trans-membrane permeation rates, reverse osmosis (RO) tests, widely used desalination technology where a strong external pressure is applied to overcome the osmotic pressure, were also carried out to interrogate the roles of divalent metal cations in GO as desalination membrane, as illustrated in Figure 5A. The rejection rate is defined as the concentration difference between the effluent and feed solution. Following previous works (Morelos-Gomez et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2018), Na2SO4 and NaCl solution with concentration of 1000 and 2000 ppm were used as feed solution. In such concentration regime where Kohlrausch's law stands, the rejection rate therefore can be calculated directly by the conductivity difference between the effluent and feed solution.
Figure 5
Reverse osmosis test
(A) Schematic of the reverse osmosis test.
(B–E) The performances of membranes using 1000 ppm NaCl (B), 2000 ppm NaCl (C), 1000 ppm Na2SO4 (D), and 2000 ppm Na2SO4 (E) as feed solution in reverse osmosis tests. The applied pressure was 15 bar.
Reverse osmosis test(A) Schematic of the reverse osmosis test.(B–E) The performances of membranes using 1000 ppm NaCl (B), 2000 ppm NaCl (C), 1000 ppm Na2SO4 (D), and 2000 ppm Na2SO4 (E) as feed solution in reverse osmosis tests. The applied pressure was 15 bar.The results of RO tests are shown in Figures 5B–5E. It is unambiguously clear that the different roles of divalent metal cations in GO membrane during reverse osmosis test are also prominent. As compared with pristine GO membrane, Mg-GO and Ca-GO membrane have quite similar rejection rate and permeated water flux as well. However, Cu-GO membrane has an enhanced rejection rate and lowered permeated water flux. For instance, when using 1000 ppm NaCl feed solution, the rejection rates of GO, Mg-GO, Ca-GO, and Cu-GO are 70.9±1.0 %, 69.2±0.9 %, 72.5±1.3 %, and 78.4±0.6 %, with corresponding permeated water fluxes 0.15±0.02, 0.14±0.01, 0.12±0.01, and 0.05±0.01 liter per square meter per hour per bar (LMHB), respectively (Figure 5B). Clearly, Cu2+ modifications could lead to enhanced salt rejection rate and decreased water flux of GO membrane, while Mg2+ and Ca2+ modifications could not. Increasing the concentration of the feed solution leads to decreased salt rejection rate, as expected. However, the conclusion of enhanced salt rejection rate and decreased water flux of GO membrane with Cu2+ modifications is still valid. For instance, when the 2000 ppm NaCl solution was used as feed, as shown in Figure 5C, the rejection rates of GO, Mg-GO, Ca-GO, and Cu-GO are 60.0±1.9 %, 60.7±0.6 %, 60.5±0.9 %, and 68.9±0.6 %, with corresponding permeated water fluxes 0.12±0.01, 0.12±0.01, 0.12±0.01, and 0.04±0.01 LMHB, respectively. Tests using Na2SO4 feed solution showed coherent trend. When using 1000 ppm Na2SO4 feed solution, the rejection rates of GO, Mg-GO, Ca-GO, and Cu-GO are 86.9±1.8%, 84.1±1.8 %, 89.8±2.5 %, and 93.8±0.3 %, with corresponding water fluxes 0.15±0.02, 0.12±0.01, 0.13±0.01, and 0.08±0.01 LMHB, respectively (Figure 5D). When the Na2SO4 feed concentration was elevated to 2000 ppm, the rejection rates of GO, Mg-GO, Ca-GO, and Cu-GO are 89.7±0.6 %, 86.8±0.4 %, 89.0±0.6 %, and 91.5±0.2%, with corresponding permeated water fluxes 0.12±0.01, 0.13±0.01, 0.12±0.01, and 0.06±0.01 LMHB, respectively (Figure 5E). Owing to the fact that sulfate anion is larger than chloride anion in size, as well as having large electrostatic repulsion effect, it is no surprise that all membranes showed higher rejection rates to Na2SO4 than to NaCl. All the results of reverse osmosis tests are consistent with the trans-membrane permeation rate results in Figure 4. No obvious change of flux and rejection rate was observed for Cu-GO membrane within the sampling duration (Figure S10). Our systematic tests coherently demonstrate the enhanced salt rejection of GO membrane with single-site Cu2+ modification, while Mg2+ and Ca2+ play a trivial part in GO as desalination membrane. The performance contrast of M-GO membranes in RO should be traced backed to the different water and ions configurations within the two-dimensional channel of GO membrane.
Conclusions
To conclude, we explored the roles of single-site divalent metal cations in tuning the interlayer chemistry of graphene oxide membrane and their influence on the mass transport through membrane. Our results reveal the exotic role of Cu2+ in graphene oxide membrane due to the strong interactions between graphene oxide matrices and single site Cu2+ cations. These strong interactions between Cu2+ and graphene oxide matrices can suppress the swelling of graphene oxide membrane in the wet state, thus enabling a narrower interlayer spacing. With single-site Cu2+ modifications, graphene oxide membrane is endowed with enhanced salt rejection accordingly. By comparison, Mg2+ and Ca2+ did not show much effect in tuning the salt rejection of graphene oxide membrane.
Limitations of the study
This work demonstrates the control of ion transport in GO membranes via cation modification. Cu2+ decorates the GO membrane as single-site cations and is more effective in restricting the swelling of GO membranes comparing to other cations. A better membrane assembly process needs to be developed to decrease the membrane thickness and increase the flux to the level comparable to commercial polymeric membranes.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Prof. Chong Liu (chongliu@uchicago.edu).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents
Experimental model and subject details
The graphene oxide (GO) membranes were prepared through vacuum-assisted filtration method. The divalent cation modifications were made. Then as-prepared divalent ions modified GO membranes were used for structural characterizations, permeation tests and reverse osmosis tests.
Method details
Materials
Omnipore™ PTFE support (0.2 um) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. MgCl2 (anhydrous, 99%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. CuCl2.2H2O (99+%) was purchased from Acros Organics. CaCl2.2H2O (99%), NaCl (99.5+%), Na2SO4 (>99%) and copper acetate hydrate (98%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. All these chemicals were used as received without further treatment.
Membrane fabrication
Graphene oxide (GO) solution (∼0.5 mg mL−1) was diluted from GO slurries (which were purchased from SHENZHEN DX TIME TECHNOLOGY Co. LTD). The GO solution was thoroughly dialyzed to remove residual ions and other impurities before membrane fabrication.For the pristine GO membrane fabrication, 1 mL dialyzed GO solution was diluted into ∼20 mL with DI water. Then the diluted solution was filtered onto porous PTFE support under the assistance of vacuum. For the divalent metal cation modified GO membrane, corresponding solution (5 mL, 0.01M MgCl2, CaCl2 and CuCl2) was then filtered onto as-prepared pristine GO membrane. Then the membrane was thoroughly washed with DI water until the conductivity of washing water was <10 μS/cm. Finally, the as-prepared wet GO membranes were transferred onto Petri dishes and left dry naturally for further tests.
Characterization
HAADF-STEM images were taken on JEOL JEM-ARM200CF under 80 kV. AFM was done on Bruker 3A/MultiMode 5. SEM was done on Carl Zeiss Merlin. Raman spectra were collected on Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution. UV-Vis spectra were collected on Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus UV-VIS-NIR Dual Beam Spectrophotometer. XPS was tested on KRATOS AXIS NOVA X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer. XRD patterns were performed on Bruker D8 Powder X-ray Diffractometer. ICP-MS data were collected on Thermo iCapQ ICP-MS equipped with collision cell technology. Synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectra (e.g., X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements) were collected at the beamline 12-BM of Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratory. The XANES and EXAFS spectra were taken under ambient temperature at the absorption K-edge of Cu. The acquired XANES and EXAFS data were processed according to standard procedures using the ATHENA software. The high-energy X-ray scattering (HEXS) with pair distribution function (PDF) analysis was performed at 11-ID-B of APS at Argonne National Laboratory, where the data collection was conducted under ambient conditions with the synchrotron radiation (58.7 keV). The Kapton film and CeO2 powder were used as the sample background and standard for detector alignment, respectively. The integration of the raw scattering images into the Q-space diffraction data was carried out in GSAS-II, which were then converted to the reduced structure functions and real-space PDF patterns following standard PDFGetX3 procedure(Juhás et al., 2013).
Competitive M2+ trans-membrane permeation test
In the trans-membrane test of Figure 2, solutions in the permeate and the feed were continuously sampled out during the permeation test for ICP-MS test to check the concentrations of the metal cations. During the permeation test, both chambers were tightly sealed to avoid concentration change due to water evaporation. The test was done at ∼ 20°C. The pH value of the mixture solution was ∼4.7.
Salt rejection tests of membrane
The conductivity measurements were performed on Seven Excellence pH/Ion/Cond meter S475 and Orion Star. Reverse osmosis tests were done using Sterlitech HP4750 High Pressure Stirred Cell. At least three membranes were tested for each kind of membrane. The tests were done at ∼ 20°C. The pH values of the feed salt solution were ∼5.3–5.7.
Quantification and statistical analysis
The conductivities of relevant solutions were collected on Seven Excellence pH/Ion/Cond meter S475 and Orion Star. The concentrations of metal cations were measured through ICP-MS tests on Thermo iCapQ ICP-MS equipped with collision cell technology. Figures are produced in Origin from the raw data.
Additional resources
Any additional information about the graphene oxide membrane fabrication, permeation tests, reverse osmosis test and data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact on request.
Authors: T Humplik; J Lee; S C O'Hern; B A Fellman; M A Baig; S F Hassan; M A Atieh; F Rahman; T Laoui; R Karnik; E N Wang Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Luda Wang; Michael S H Boutilier; Piran R Kidambi; Doojoon Jang; Nicolas G Hadjiconstantinou; Rohit Karnik Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Sumedh P Surwade; Sergei N Smirnov; Ivan V Vlassiouk; Raymond R Unocic; Gabriel M Veith; Sheng Dai; Shannon M Mahurin Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: R K Joshi; P Carbone; F C Wang; V G Kravets; Y Su; I V Grigorieva; H A Wu; A K Geim; R R Nair Journal: Science Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jijo Abraham; Kalangi S Vasu; Christopher D Williams; Kalon Gopinadhan; Yang Su; Christie T Cherian; James Dix; Eric Prestat; Sarah J Haigh; Irina V Grigorieva; Paola Carbone; Andre K Geim; Rahul R Nair Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 39.213