| Literature DB >> 35359759 |
Zeyong Liu1, Te Bu1, Selcuk Akpinar2, Blazo Jabucanin3.
Abstract
Objective: According to the seventh demographic census, China's elderly population reached 260 million, accounting for 18.7% of the total population, indicating that China is on the verge of transitioning from a relatively mild aging to a moderately aging society, and an aging society inevitably brings concerns about the elderly people's health. The purpose of this study was to better understand the effect of economic development on the physical fitness of the elderly people aged 60-69 in China during the first two decades of the twenty-first century, as well as to establish a correlation between China's gross domestic product (GDP) and changes in the elderly people's passing rate of national physical fitness standards.Entities:
Keywords: GDP; policy coordination; population aging; public financing; public health; spillovers; sports industry
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35359759 PMCID: PMC8961805 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.857691
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
List of China's public financial investments in sports as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 8.16 | 9.921 | 0.08 |
| 2001 | 10.82 | 11.086 | 0.09 |
| 2002 | 14.18 | 12.171 | 0.11 |
| 2003 | 15.53 | 13.742 | 0.11 |
| 2004 | 17.38 | 16.184 | 0.11 |
| 2005 | 18.02 | 18.731 | 0.10 |
| 2006 | 21.57 | 21.943 | 0.10 |
| 2007 | 26.01 | 27.009 | 0.10 |
| 2008 | 33.27 | 31.924 | 0.10 |
| 2009 | 31.35 | 34.851 | 0.09 |
| 2010 | 33.42 | 41.211 | 0.08 |
| 2011 | 36.52 | 48.794 | 0.07 |
| 2012 | 38.84 | 53.858 | 0.07 |
| 2013 | 31.58 | 59.296 | 0.05 |
| 2014 | 33.38 | 64.356 | 0.05 |
| 2015 | 35.50 | 68.885 | 0.05 |
| 2016 | 40.66 | 74.358 | 0.05 |
| 2017 | 46.90 | 82.075 | 0.06 |
Indicators of body morphology average test results in national physical fitness standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Male | 2000 | 60–64 | 165.4 | 64.5 | 89.5 | 83.0 | 92.6 | 12.3 | 17.7 | 21.9 | / |
| 65–69 | 164.8 | 63.7 | 89.0 | 83.4 | 92.5 | 12.2 | 17.5 | 21.5 | / | ||
| 2005 | 60–64 | 165.3 | 65.0 | 90.5 | 83.9 | 92.1 | 11.3 | 17.4 | 21.3 | / | |
| 65–69 | 165.0 | 63.9 | 89.8 | 83.5 | 91.9 | 11.5 | 17.2 | 20.9 | / | ||
| 2010 | 60–64 | 165.7 | 66.6 | 91.5 | 85.4 | 93.0 | 11.0 | 16.8 | 20.6 | / | |
| 65–69 | 164.9 | 65.3 | 91.2 | 85.3 | 92.8 | 11.2 | 16.6 | 20.3 | / | ||
| 2014 | 60–64 | 166.1 | 67.6 | 92.6 | 87.0 | 94.2 | 12.0 | 17.6 | 22.2 | / | |
| 65–69 | 165.4 | 66.6 | 92.2 | 86.8 | 94.0 | 12.3 | 17.5 | 21.9 | / | ||
| 2020 | 60–64 | 165.9 | 69.0 | / | 89.3 | 96.4 | / | / | / | 23.3 | |
| 65–69 | 165.4 | 68.1 | / | 89.3 | 96.3 | / | / | / | 23.3 | ||
| Female | 2000 | 60–64 | 154.2 | 57.6 | 87.8 | 81.5 | 93.5 | 18.8 | 21.6 | 28.7 | / |
| 65–69 | 153.4 | 56.5 | 87.1 | 81.8 | 93.0 | 17.9 | 20.3 | 27.4 | / | ||
| 2005 | 60–64 | 154.1 | 58.0 | 88.4 | 82.9 | 93.2 | 19.8 | 21.9 | 28.9 | / | |
| 65–69 | 153.2 | 56.4 | 86.8 | 82.4 | 92.3 | 18.8 | 20.8 | 27.9 | / | ||
| 2010 | 60–64 | 155.3 | 59.7 | 90.6 | 84.7 | 94.7 | 19.8 | 21.2 | 27.4 | / | |
| 65–69 | 154.4 | 59.2 | 90.4 | 85.5 | 94.5 | 19.5 | 20.8 | 27.0 | / | ||
| 2014 | 60–64 | 154.5 | 59.2 | 89.5 | 84.0 | 94.1 | 20.0 | 21.1 | 26.9 | / | |
| 65–69 | 153.4 | 57.7 | 88.6 | 84.0 | 93.4 | 19.2 | 20.0 | 25.9 | / | ||
| 2020 | 60–64 | 155.1 | 60.3 | / | 85.5 | 95.3 | / | / | / | 32.9 | |
| 65–69 | 154.4 | 59.8 | / | 86.4 | 95.4 | / | / | / | 33.0 | ||
Indicators of physical function average test results in national physical fitness standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 2000 | 60–64 | 3.4 | 37.4 | 12.0 | 0.7 | / |
| 65–69 | 1.6 | 34.9 | 9.4 | 0.8 | / | ||
| 2005 | 60–64 | 1.9 | 37.5 | 10.8 | 0.66 | / | |
| 65–69 | 0.5 | 35.0 | 8.7 | 0.72 | / | ||
| 2010 | 60–64 | 1.8 | 37.4 | 10.1 | 0.7 | / | |
| 65–69 | 0.5 | 34.6 | 8.2 | 0.7 | / | ||
| 2014 | 60–64 | 2.1 | 37.3 | 9.4 | 0.67 | / | |
| 65–69 | 1.5 | 35.0 | 8.2 | 0.70 | / | ||
| 2020 | 60–64 | 2.4 | 36.5 | 11.3 | 0.72 | 12.0 | |
| 65–69 | 1.7 | 35.1 | 10.3 | 0.74 | 11.7 | ||
| Female | 2000 | 60–64 | 8.4 | 23.9 | 9.7 | 0.8 | / |
| 65–69 | 7.1 | 22.8 | 8.4 | 0.8 | / | ||
| 2005 | 60–64 | 7.8 | 23.5 | 9.1 | 0.73 | / | |
| 65–69 | 6.4 | 22.2 | 7.9 | 0.78 | / | ||
| 2010 | 60–64 | 7.9 | 23.2 | 8.5 | 0.71 | / | |
| 65–69 | 7.2 | 22.3 | 7.7 | 0.75 | / | ||
| 2014 | 60–64 | 7.9 | 23.3 | 9.2 | 0.7 | / | |
| 65–69 | 6.7 | 21.8 | 7.4 | 0.8 | / | ||
| 2020 | 60–64 | 7.9 | 22.8 | 109 | 0.74 | 11.8 | |
| 65–69 | 7.1 | 21.6 | 9.9 | 0.78 | 11.3 |
Figure 1Linear regression of gross domestic product and elderly people's passing rate of national physical fitness standards in the five corresponding years: 2000, 2005, 2010, 2014, and 2020.
Indicators of body function average test results in national physical fitness standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 2000 | 60–64 | 130.7 | 81.2 | 78.1 | 2649.9 | / |
| 65–69 | 132.8 | 80.9 | 78.5 | 2441.3 | / | ||
| 2005 | 60–64 | 129.2 | 80.5 | 77.4 | 2,565 | / | |
| 65–69 | 131.1 | 79.6 | 77.3 | 2,364 | / | ||
| 2010 | 60–64 | 130.2 | 81.6 | 76.0 | 2,611 | / | |
| 65–69 | 132.0 | 81.2 | 75.7 | 2,407 | / | ||
| 2014 | 60–64 | 129.4 | 81.0 | 77.2 | 2,563 | / | |
| 65–69 | 131.0 | 80.2 | 76.8 | 2,432 | / | ||
| 2020 | 60–64 | / | / | / | 2,509 | 51.8 | |
| 65–69 | / | / | / | 2,342 | 50.7 | ||
| Female | 2000 | 60–64 | 129.2 | 79.5 | 77.9 | 1861.0 | / |
| 65–69 | 131.1 | 79.3 | 78.2 | 1761.6 | / | ||
| 2005 | 60–64 | 127.6 | 78.2 | 76.8 | 1,725 | / | |
| 65–69 | 129.5 | 77.9 | 77.3 | 1,617 | / | ||
| 2010 | 60–64 | 126.8 | 77.7 | 76.4 | 1,829 | / | |
| 65–69 | 129.5 | 78.0 | 76.8 | 1,747 | / | ||
| 2014 | 60–64 | 128.1 | 79.4 | 75.6 | 1,766 | / | |
| 65–69 | 130.4 | 79.2 | 75.6 | 1,645 | / | ||
| 2020 | 60–64 | / | / | / | 1,785 | 55.1 | |
| 65–69 | / | / | / | 1,679 | 52.3 |