| Literature DB >> 35359671 |
Shengyu Xu1,2,3,4, Lianchao Tang1,2,3,4, Haitao Xu5, Yi Yang1,2,3,4, Meng Cao1,2,3,4, Sirun Chen1,2,3,4, Xuemei Jiang1,2,3,4, Jian Li1,2,3,4, Yan Lin1,2,3,4, Lianqiang Che1,2,3,4, Zhengfeng Fang1,2,3,4, Bin Feng1,2,3,4, Yong Zhuo1,2,3,4, Jianping Wang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
To study the effects of energy and dietary fiber on breast development in gilts and its possible mechanisms, 32 gilts (Landrace × Yorkshire) were randomly allocated into a 2 × 2 factorial design to receive a diet with low or high energy [LE: 33.37 MJ/d digestible energy (DE); HE: 41.87 MJ/d DE] and low or high fiber (LF: 0.3 kg/d dietary fiber, HF: 0.6 kg/d dietary fiber). The weight of breast tissue was recorded. The mammary glands were collected for further analyses. The high energy intake increased the relative weight of breast tissue (p < 0.05) and the content of breast fat (p < 0.05). At the same time, the oil red staining of breast slices also showed an increase in breast fat content in high-energy treatment. High energy intake increased the DNA concentration in breast tissues (p < 0.05). In addition, high energy intake increased the concentration of triglycerides, free fatty acids, and total cholesterol in the blood of gilts (p < 0.05), and the supplementation of high fiber tended to reduce free fatty acids, total cholesterol, and estradiol (p < 0.1). Proteomic analysis suggested that there were notable differences in the cytoskeleton, intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle, apoptosis, receptor activity, and endopeptidase inhibitor activity in molecular function between the energy and fiber effects (p < 0.05). High fiber intake also decreased the mRNA expression of 5-HT7, Bax, and caspase-3 in the breast tissue of gilts (p < 0.05), which further confirmed the importance of fiber in regulating breast development in gilt. Our results indicate that increasing gilt energy intake improved breast weight and fat deposition and increased breast cell apoptosis. Increased fiber intake reduced breast fat deposition and breast cell apoptosis at high energy intake in gilts. These results provide a potential strategy for dietary intervention against high energy intake in gilts and even in humans.Entities:
Keywords: energy; fiber; gilt; mammary glands; proteomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35359671 PMCID: PMC8960423 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.830392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1The effect of energy and fiber interaction on the sagittal area (A) and (B) relative weight of the mammary gland of the gilts (n = 8). LELF, low-energy low-fiber group; LEHF, low-energy high-fiber group; HELF, high energy low-fiber group; HEHF, high-energy high-fiber group; E × F, energy and fiber interaction. a, bMeans not sharing identical superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effects of energy and fiber interaction on crude fat (A) and DNA (B) concentration in mammary gland of gilts (n = 8). LELF, low-energy low-fiber group; LEHF, low-energy high-fiber group; HELF, high-energy low-fiber group; HEHF, high-energy high-fiber group; E × F, energy and fiber interaction. a, bMeans not sharing identical superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Representative images (A–D) of red-staining sections of mammary gland in gilts and the effect of energy and fiber on the relatively oil red O–staining area of mammary gland in gilts (n = 8, E). (A) Low-energy low-fiber group; (B) low-energy high fiber; (C) high-energy low-fiber group; (D) high-energy high-fiber group. LELF, low-energy low-fiber; LEHF, low-energy high-fiber; HELF, high-energy low-fiber; HEHF, high-energy high-fiber; E × F, energy and fiber interaction. a, bMeans not sharing identical superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Effects of energy and fiber levels on plasma metabolites in gilts.
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| TG | 0.291 ± 0.027 | 0.283 ± 0.026 | 0.416 ± 0.042 | 0.330 ± 0.027 | 0.010 | 0.142 | 0.219 |
| TC | 1.896 ± 0.144 | 1.825 ± 0.057 | 2.244 ± 0.072 | 1.979 ± 0.082 | 0.013 | 0.088 | 0.315 |
| NEFA | 0.082 ± 0.006c | 0.085 ± 0.008c | 0.205 ± 0.021 | 0.150 ± 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 0.039 |
| HDL-C | 0.845 ± 0.077 | 0.834 ± 0.032 | 0.845 ± 0.061 | 0.916 ± 0.065 | 0.501 | 0.625 | 0.507 |
| LDL-C | 0.879 ± 0.075 | 0.794 ± 0.022 | 0.916 ± 0.062 | 0.800 ± 0.062 | 0.714 | 0.100 | 0.800 |
Values are mean ± SE. n = 8. TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LE, low energy; HE, high energy; LF, low fiber; HF, high fiber; E × F, energy and fiber interaction.
,
Means not sharing identical superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Effects of energy and fiber levels on serum hormone concentrations in gilts.
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Estradiol, pg/mL | 71.14, 6.36 | 55.14, 5.59 | 94.58, 14.39 | 87.21, 12.79 | 0.013 | 0.276 | 0.685 |
| Prolactin, mIU/L | 228.00, 12.90 | 249.00, 11.50 | 244.20, 14.90 | 244.50, 3.00 | 0.599 | 0.342 | 0.359 |
| Testosterone, pg/mL | 73.50, 3.30 | 78.20, 3.30 | 78.00, 2.60 | 78.10, 2.50 | 0.467 | 0.427 | 0.436 |
| Progesterone, ng/mL | 2.63, 0.19 | 3.26, 0.28 | 2.88, 0.34 | 3.03, 0.21 | 0.969 | 0.156 | 0.385 |
Values are mean ± SE. n = 8. LE, low energy; HE, high energy; LF, low fiber; HF, high fiber; E × F, energy and fiber interaction.
,
Means not sharing identical superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) associated with development of mammary glands in the energy and fiber treatments in gilt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1RZK8 | Histone deacetylase | 5.022224 | — |
|
| A0A287BM29 | Apolipoprotein A-IV | 3.603054 | — |
|
| A0A0D5BWD2 | Mitochondrial complement component 1 Q subcomponent-binding protein | 1.785695 | — |
|
| F1SLR1 | NADH dehydrogenase | 0.463774 | — |
|
| P12309 | Glutaredoxin-1 | 0.458297 | — |
|
| A0A287A808 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit | 0.437125 | — |
|
| P27917 | Apolipoprotein C-III | — | 1.609517 |
|
| F1S0J2 | Apolipoprotein R precursor | — | 1.51511 |
|
| A0A287AH85 | Adenylate kinase 2, mitochondrial | — | 0.81694 |
|
| I3LNG8 | Stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 | — | 0.726254 |
|
| A0A287BEZ5 | Acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase, cytoplasmic | — | 0.533272 |
|
| F1SIS9 | NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1α subcomplex subunit 10, mitochondrial | — | 0.380405 |
|
The change of protein expression level was expressed by the ratio of energy or fiber/control group. The FC (fold change) ratio >1 (p < 0.05) indicates up-regulation, and the FC ratio < 1 (p < 0.05) indicates down-regulation.
Figure 4The functional enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) annotation of the DEPs. (A) Energy differential protein GO annotation diagram. (B) Fiber differential protein GO annotation diagram.
Effects of energy and fiber levels on relative mRNA expression in mammary gland.
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.12 | 1.18 ± 0.20 | 1.41 ± 0.16 | 1.31 ± 0.12 | 0.087 | 0.777 | 0.367 |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.61 | 1.11 ± 0.99 | 1.93 ± 1.92 | 1.34 ± 0.97 | 0.076 | 0.458 | 0.277 |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.13 | 1.43 ± 0.30 | 1.59 ± 0.59 | 1.50 ± 0.51 | 0.108 | 0.389 | 0.214 |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.09 | 1.08 ± 0.12 | 1.42 ± 0.17 | 1.40 ± 0.19 | 0.044 | 0.838 | 0.765 |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.06 | 1.03 ± 0.09 | 1.47 ± 0.26 | 1.35 ± 0.19 | 0.029 | 0.801 | 0.674 |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.12 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.91 ± 0.15 | 0.91 ± 0.13 | 0.818 | 0.315 | 0.322 |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.19 | 1.07 ± 0.21 | 1.47 ± 0.20 | 1.51 ± 0.20 | 0.030 | 0.780 | 0.941 |
Values are mean ± SE. n = 8. LE, low energy; HE, high energy; LF, low fiber; HF, high fiber; E × F, energy and fiber interaction; 5-HTR.
,
Means not sharing identical superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).